Literature DB >> 15578183

Assessment of image quality of a standard and three dose-reducing protocols in adult cranial CT.

Sadi Gündoğdu1, Kamran Mahmutyazicioğlu, Hüseyin Ozdemir, Ahmet Savranlar, Kiyasettin Asil.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of various tube current settings (mAs) and optimize the image quality and dose for adult cranial CT protocol. Sixty adult patients who underwent a cranial CT scanning for different indications were subdivided into three subgroups. Subjective image and noise quality scores and quantitative noise measurements were selectively studied on three reference levels (cerebellar, basal ganglia and centrum semiovale levels). For each subgroup, only one level was studied. Head circumference (HC) and the maximum anteroposterior diameter (MAPD) of each patient were measured. At 50% decreased dose protocol, there was no poor quality score at any level. At nearly 60% decreased dose protocol, the incidence of poor quality scores was much higher at the cerebellar level than at the other two levels. For the same protocol number, quantitative noise measurements were higher at the cerebellar level than the other two supratentorial levels. The correlation was found to be significant between HC, MAPD and quantitative noise measurements, and there was a non-significant correlation between HC and subjective noise scores. In adult cranial CT, depending on the level, a dose reduction of up to 60% may be possible while maintaining image quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15578183     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2550-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  15 in total

1.  MAPD--an objective way to select mAs for paediatric brain CT.

Authors:  E T Wong; S K Yu; M Lai; Y C Wong; P C Lau
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  CT dose parameters and their limitations.

Authors:  Thomas Fearon
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-03-06

3.  Current adult and pediatric CT doses.

Authors:  Edward Nickoloff
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2002-03-07

4.  Comparison of low-dose and standard-dose helical CT in the evaluation of pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Nevzat Karabulut; Mustafa Törü; Veli Gelebek; Meltem Gülsün; O Macit Ariyürek
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-04-18       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Management of patient dose and image noise in routine pediatric CT abdominal examinations.

Authors:  Francis R Verdun; D Lepori; Pascal Monnin; Jean-François Valley; Pierre Schnyder; F Gudinchet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-01-13       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Paranasal sinuses: low-dose CT.

Authors:  G Marmolya; E J Wiesen; R Yagan; C D Haria; A C Shah
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Radiation dose reduction in CT of the pediatric pelvis.

Authors:  I R Kamel; R J Hernandez; J E Martin; A E Schlesinger; L T Niklason; K E Guire
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  A rational approach to dose reduction in CT: individualized scan protocols.

Authors:  J E Wilting; A Zwartkruis; M S van Leeuwen; J Timmer; A G Kamphuis; M Feldberg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001-07-26       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Clinical comparison of standard-dose and 50% reduced-dose abdominal CT: effect on image quality.

Authors:  Mannudeep K Kalra; Srinivasa Prasad; Sanjay Saini; Michael A Blake; Jose Varghese; Elkan F Halpern; James H Thrall; James T Rhea
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Low-dose spiral computed tomography of the thorax: comparison with the standard-dose technique.

Authors:  M Takahashi; W M Maguire; M Ashtari; A Khan; Z Papp; R Alberico; W Campbell; T Eacobacci; P G Herman
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 6.016

View more
  3 in total

1.  Suitability of helical multislice acquisition technique for routine unenhanced brain CT: an image quality study using a 16-row detector configuration.

Authors:  Danielle Hernalsteen; Guy Cosnard; Annie Robert; Cécile Grandin; Alain Vlassenbroek; Thierry Duprez
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Influence of CBCT parameters on the output of an automatic edge-detection-based endodontic segmentation.

Authors:  J Michetti; M Georgelin-Gurgel; J-P Mallet; F Diemer; K Boulanouar
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Visual grading characteristics and ordinal regression analysis during optimisation of CT head examinations.

Authors:  Francis Zarb; Mark F McEntee; Louise Rainford
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2014-12-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.