Literature DB >> 8798029

Image quality and dose in spiral computed tomography.

F R Verdun1, R A Meuli, F O Bochud, C Imsand, S Raimondi, P Schnyder, J F Valley.   

Abstract

Image quality and dose produced by a spiral CT with various pitch values were investigated on the basis of test-object images and measurements of CT dose indexes. No major difference in image quality or dose was observed when comparing sequential and spiral mode acquisition with a pitch of one. Increase in pitch value produces a loss of contrast which leads to a loss of detectability. Nevertheless, in realistic protocols the image quality in the transverse plane remains acceptable up to pitch values of 1.3-1.6.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8798029     DOI: 10.1007/bf00182477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of section sensitivity profiles and image noise in spiral CT.

Authors:  A Polacin; W A Kalender; G Marchal
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Technologic advances in computed tomography.

Authors:  T Villafana
Journal:  Curr Opin Radiol       Date:  1991-04

3.  Computed tomography scanning with simultaneous patient translation.

Authors:  C R Crawford; K F King
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Physical performance characteristics of spiral CT scanning.

Authors:  W A Kalender; A Polacin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Principles and applications of spiral CT.

Authors:  W A Kalender
Journal:  Nucl Med Biol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation.

Authors:  W A Kalender; W Seissler; E Klotz; P Vock
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Helical (spiral) CT of the abdomen.

Authors:  R K Zeman; S H Fox; P M Silverman; W J Davros; L M Carter; D Griego; D I Weltman; S M Ascher; C J Cooper
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 8.  Spiral (helical) CT.

Authors:  J P Heiken; J A Brink; M W Vannier
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  A comparison of conventional and spiral CT: an experimental study on the detection of spherical lesions.

Authors:  W A Kalender; A Polacin; C Süss
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1994 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

10.  The line spread function and modulation transfer function of a computed tomographic scanner.

Authors:  P F Judy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1976 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  3 in total

1.  CT of the head by use of reduced current and kilovoltage: relationship between image quality and dose reduction.

Authors:  M Cohnen; H Fischer; J Hamacher; E Lins; R Kötter; U Mödder
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  [Strategies for reducing the CT radiation dose].

Authors:  S T Schindera; C Nauer; R Treier; P Trueb; G von Allmen; P Vock; Z Szucs-Farkas
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Improving image accuracy of region-of-interest in cone-beam CT using prior image.

Authors:  Jiseoc Lee; Jin Sung Kim; Seungryong Cho
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.102

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.