Literature DB >> 10757607

Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype.

S Vedantham1, A Karellas, S Suryanarayanan, D Albagli, S Han, E J Tkaczyk, C E Landberg, B Opsahl-Ong, P R Granfors, I Levis, C J D'Orsi, R E Hendrick.   

Abstract

The physical characteristics of a clinical prototype amorphous silicon-based flat panel imager for full-breast digital mammography have been investigated. The imager employs a thin thallium doped CsI scintillator on an amorphous silicon matrix of detector elements with a pixel pitch of 100 microm. Objective criteria such as modulation transfer function (MTF), noise power spectrum, detective quantum efficiency (DQE), and noise equivalent quanta were employed for this evaluation. The presampling MTF was found to be 0.73, 0.42, and 0.28 at 2, 4, and 5 cycles/mm, respectively. The measured DQE of the current prototype utilizing a 28 kVp, Mo-Mo spectrum beam hardened with 4.5 cm Lucite is approximately 55% at close to zero spatial frequency at an exposure of 32.8 mR, and decreases to approximately 40% at a low exposure of 1.3 mR. Detector element nonuniformity and electronic gain variations were not significant after appropriate calibration and software corrections. The response of the imager was linear and did not exhibit signal saturation under tested exposure conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10757607      PMCID: PMC4280189          DOI: 10.1118/1.598895

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  33 in total

1.  A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography.

Authors:  H Fujita; D Y Tsai; T Itoh; K Doi; J Morishita; K Ueda; A Ohtsuka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Restoration of digital multiplane tomosynthesis by a constrained iteration method.

Authors:  U E Ruttimann; R A Groenhuis; R L Webber
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Analysis of clustered microcalcifications by using a single numeric classifier extracted from mammographic digital images.

Authors:  S S Buchbinder; I S Leichter; P N Bamberger; B Novak; R Lederman; S Fields; D J Behar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.173

4.  A genetic algorithm-based method for optimizing the performance of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms.

Authors:  M A Anastasio; H Yoshida; R Nagel; R M Nishikawa; K Doi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  X-ray characterization of breast phantom materials.

Authors:  J W Byng; J G Mainprize; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Scanned-projection digital mammography.

Authors:  R M Nishikawa; G E Mawdsley; A Fenster; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Signal-to-noise properties of mammographic film-screen systems.

Authors:  R M Nishikawa; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1985 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Effects of undersampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra, and noise equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems.

Authors:  J T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Image quality control for digital mammographic systems: initial experience and outlook.

Authors:  H Roehrig; T Yu; E Krupinski
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Performance of glass fiber antiscatter devices at mammographic energies.

Authors:  R Fahrig; J G Mainprize; N Robert; A Rogers; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  46 in total

1.  Breast imaging using an amorphous silicon-based full-field digital mammographic system: stability of a clinical prototype.

Authors:  S Vedantham; A Karellas; S Suryanarayanan; C J D'Orsi; R E Hendrick
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD-based digital cassette: physical characteristics of a clinical system.

Authors:  S Vedantham; A Karellas; S Suryanarayanan; I Levis; M Sayag; R Kleehammer; R Heidsieck; C J D'Orsi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Solid-state fluoroscopic imager for high-resolution angiography: parallel-cascaded linear systems analysis.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Solid-state fluoroscopic imager for high-resolution angiography: physical characteristics of an 8 cm x 8 cm experimental prototype.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Steven K Onishi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Effects of exposure equalization on image signal-to-noise ratios in digital mammography: a simulation study with an anthropomorphic breast phantom.

Authors:  Xinming Liu; Chao-Jen Lai; Gary J Whitman; William R Geiser; Youtao Shen; Ying Yi; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Task-based modeling and optimization of a cone-beam CT scanner for musculoskeletal imaging.

Authors:  P Prakash; W Zbijewski; G J Gang; Y Ding; J W Stayman; J Yorkston; J A Carrino; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: State of the Art.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas; Gopal R Vijayaraghavan; Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Emerging Breast Imaging Technologies on the Horizon.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  Semin Ultrasound CT MR       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 1.875

9.  Flat detectors and their clinical applications.

Authors:  Martin Spahn
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-04-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 10.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.