Literature DB >> 15806363

Flat detectors and their clinical applications.

Martin Spahn1.   

Abstract

Diagnostic and interventional flat detector X-ray systems are penetrating the market in all application segments. First introduced in radiography and mammography, they have conquered cardiac and general angiography and are getting increasing attention in fluoroscopy. Two flat detector technologies prevail. The dominating method is based on an indirect X-ray conversion process, using cesium iodide scintillators. It offers considerable advantages in radiography, angiography and fluoroscopy. The other method employs a direct converter such as selenium which is particularly suitable for mammography. Both flat detector technologies are based on amorphous silicon active pixel matrices. Flat detectors facilitate the clinical workflow in radiographic rooms, foster improved image quality and provide the potential to reduce dose. This added value is based on their large dynamic range, their high sensitivity to X-rays and the instant availability of the image. Advanced image processing is instrumental in these improvements and expand the range of conventional diagnostic methods. In angiography and fluoroscopy the transition from image intensifiers to flat detectors is facilitated by ample advantages they offer, such as distortion-free images, excellent coarse contrast, large dynamic range and high X-ray sensitivity. These characteristics and their compatibility with strong magnetic fields are the basis for improved diagnostic methods and innovative interventional applications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15806363     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2734-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  23 in total

1.  Self-normalizing method to measure the detective quantum efficiency of a wide range of x-ray detectors.

Authors:  K Stierstorfer; M Spahn
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  The x-ray sensitivity of amorphous selenium for mammography.

Authors:  Mary F Stone; Wei Zhao; Barbara V Jacak; Paul O'Connor; Bo Yu; Pavel Rehak
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 3.  Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential.

Authors:  James T Dobbins; Devon J Godfrey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Direct conversion detectors: the effect of incomplete charge collection on detective quantum efficiency.

Authors:  James G Mainprize; Dylan C Hunt; Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Performance of a flat-panel detector in the detection of artificial erosive changes: comparison with conventional screen-film and storage-phosphor radiography.

Authors:  Karl Ludwig; Andreas Henschel; Thomas M Bernhardt; Horst Lenzen; Dag Wormanns; Stefan Diederich; Walter Heindel
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-11-29       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Flat-panel x-ray detector using amorphous silicon technology. Reduced radiation dose for the detection of foreign bodies.

Authors:  M Völk; M Strotzer; J Gmeinwieser; J Alexander; R Fründ; J Seitz; C Manke; M Spahn; S Feuerbach
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 6.016

Review 7.  Toward consensus on quantitative assessment of medical imaging systems.

Authors:  C E Metz; R F Wagner; K Doi; D G Brown; R M Nishikawa; K J Myers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Effects of undersampling on the proper interpretation of modulation transfer function, noise power spectra, and noise equivalent quanta of digital imaging systems.

Authors:  J T Dobbins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Objective performance characteristics of a new asymmetric screen-film system.

Authors:  R Van Metter; R Dickerson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Digital radiography of the skeleton using a large-area detector based on amorphous silicon technology: image quality and potential for dose reduction in comparison with screen-film radiography.

Authors:  M Völk; M Strotzer; N Holzknecht; C Manke; M Lenhart; J Gmeinwieser; J Link; M Reiser; S Feuerbach
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  12 in total

1.  [Flat panel technology in the orthopaedic trauma operating room].

Authors:  T Mattes
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  Effect of repeated x-ray exposure on the resolution of amorphous selenium based x-ray imagers.

Authors:  M Z Kabir; L Chowdhury; G DeCrescenzo; O Tousignant; S O Kasap; J A Rowlands
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Do flat detector cardiac X-ray systems convey advantages over image-intensifier-based systems? Study comparing X-ray dose and image quality.

Authors:  Andrew G Davies; Arnold R Cowen; Stephen M Kengyelics; Janet Moore; Mohan U Sivananthan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Alicia Toledano; Cosimo di Maggio; Enrica Baldan; Elisabetta Bezzon; Manuela La Grassa; Luigi Pescarini; Ilaria Polico; Alessandro Proietti; Aida Toffoli; Pier Carlo Muzzio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Effect of radiation dose level on the detectability of pulmonary nodules in chest tomosynthesis.

Authors:  Sara A Asplund; Åse A Johnsson; Jenny Vikgren; Angelica Svalkvist; Agneta Flinck; Marianne Boijsen; Valeria A Fisichella; Lars Gunnar Månsson; Magnus Båth
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-04       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Visual grading analysis of digital neonatal chest phantom X-ray images: Impact of detector type, dose and image processing on image quality.

Authors:  M H Smet; L Breysem; E Mussen; H Bosmans; N W Marshall; L Cockmartin
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Cosimo di Maggio
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-30       Impact factor: 7.034

Review 8.  Amorphous and polycrystalline photoconductors for direct conversion flat panel x-ray image sensors.

Authors:  Safa Kasap; Joel B Frey; George Belev; Olivier Tousignant; Habib Mani; Jonathan Greenspan; Luc Laperriere; Oleksandr Bubon; Alla Reznik; Giovanni DeCrescenzo; Karim S Karim; John A Rowlands
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2011-05-09       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Intravenous flat-detector computed tomography angiography for symptomatic cerebral vasospasm following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.

Authors:  Jin Pyeong Jeon; Seung Hun Sheen; Yong-Jun Cho
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-10-14

Review 10.  Pros, cons and future perspectives - three questions on three dimensional guidance for cardiac catheterization in congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Sebastian Góreczny; Gregor Krings; Ziyad M Hijazi; Thomas Fagan; Darren Berman; Damien Kenny; Gareth J Morgan
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 1.426

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.