Literature DB >> 3683300

Scanned-projection digital mammography.

R M Nishikawa1, G E Mawdsley, A Fenster, M J Yaffe.   

Abstract

The effectiveness of film-screen mammography is limited by tradeoffs between latitude and contrast, film granularity, and the need to increase dose when antiscatter methods are used. We are currently developing a scanned-projection digital mammography (SPDM) system to overcome these limitations. The system consists of a pair of scanning slits, a high-resolution x-ray image intensifier tube, a linear photodiode array, and a digital display. The detective quantum efficiency of the SPDM system at spatial frequencies up to 3 cycles/mm is similar to that of mammographic film-screen combinations, but is lower at high frequencies. For low-contrast objects as small as 0.1 mm in diameter, the signal-to-noise ratio is currently equal to that of optimally exposed mammographic film-screen images for equal dose to the breast and superior for regions which would be underexposed or overexposed on film. This is achieved by the use of a low-noise detector system, geometric magnification, and scatter elimination. Images of a contrast-detail phantom and excised breast tissue illustrate the superior contrast sensitivity of SPDM.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3683300     DOI: 10.1118/1.596147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  10 in total

1.  Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype.

Authors:  S Vedantham; A Karellas; S Suryanarayanan; D Albagli; S Han; E J Tkaczyk; C E Landberg; B Opsahl-Ong; P R Granfors; I Levis; C J D'Orsi; R E Hendrick
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Breast imaging using an amorphous silicon-based full-field digital mammographic system: stability of a clinical prototype.

Authors:  S Vedantham; A Karellas; S Suryanarayanan; C J D'Orsi; R E Hendrick
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Mammographic imaging with a small format CCD-based digital cassette: physical characteristics of a clinical system.

Authors:  S Vedantham; A Karellas; S Suryanarayanan; I Levis; M Sayag; R Kleehammer; R Heidsieck; C J D'Orsi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Effects of exposure equalization on image signal-to-noise ratios in digital mammography: a simulation study with an anthropomorphic breast phantom.

Authors:  Xinming Liu; Chao-Jen Lai; Gary J Whitman; William R Geiser; Youtao Shen; Ying Yi; Chris C Shaw
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 5.  [Clinical results of digital mammography].

Authors:  R Schulz-Wendtland; K-P Hermann; W Bautz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.635

6.  Comparison of soft-copy and hard-copy reading for full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Robert M Nishikawa; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Constantine Gatsonis; Etta D Pisano; Elodia B Cole; Helga S Marques; Carl J D'Orsi; Dione M Farria; Kalpana M Kanal; Mary C Mahoney; Murray Rebner; Melinda J Staiger
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Research in digital mammography and tomosynthesis at the University of Toronto.

Authors:  Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2014-06-25

Review 8.  A literature review on the imaging methods for breast cancer.

Authors:  Reza Gerami; Saeid Sadeghi Joni; Negin Akhondi; Ali Etemadi; Mahnaz Fosouli; Aynaz Foroughi Eghbal; Zobin Souri
Journal:  Int J Physiol Pathophysiol Pharmacol       Date:  2022-06-15

Review 9.  Breast cancer imaging: a perspective for the next decade.

Authors:  Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial.

Authors:  R Edward Hendrick; Etta D Pisano; Alice Averbukh; Catherine Moran; Eric A Berns; Martin J Yaffe; Benjamin Herman; Suddhasatta Acharyya; Constantine Gatsonis
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.959

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.