Literature DB >> 11110258

Breast imaging using an amorphous silicon-based full-field digital mammographic system: stability of a clinical prototype.

S Vedantham1, A Karellas, S Suryanarayanan, C J D'Orsi, R E Hendrick.   

Abstract

An amorphous silicon-based full-breast imager for digital mammography was evaluated for detector stability over a period of 1 year. This imager uses a structured CsI:TI scintillator coupled to an amorphous silicon layer with a 100-micron pixel pitch and read out by special purpose electronics. The stability of the system was characterized using the following quantifiable metrics: conversion factor (mean number of electrons generated per incident x-ray), presampling modulation transfer function (MTF), detector linearity and sensitivity, detector signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and American College of Radiology (ACR) accreditation phantom scores. Qualitative metrics such as flat field uniformity, geometric distortion, and Society of Motion Picture and Television Engineers (SMPTE) test pattern image quality were also used to study the stability of the system. Observations made over this 1-year period indicated that the maximum variation from the average of the measurements were less than 0.5% for conversion factor, 3% for presampling MTF over all spatial frequencies, 5% for signal response, linearity and sensitivity, 12% for SNR over seven locations for all 3 target-filter combinations, and 0% for ACR accreditation phantom scores. ACR mammographic accreditation phantom images indicated the ability to resolve 5 fibers, 4 speck groups, and 5 masses at a mean glandular dose of 1.23 mGy. The SMPTE pattern image quality test for the display monitors used for image viewing indicated ability to discern all contrast steps and ability to distinguish line-pair images at the center and corners of the image. No bleeding effects were observed in the image. Flat field uniformity for all 3 target-filter combinations displayed no artifacts such as gridlines, bad detector rows or columns, horizontal or vertical streaks, or bad pixels. Wire mesh screen images indicated uniform resolution and no geometric distortion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11110258      PMCID: PMC3453066          DOI: 10.1007/bf03168394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  23 in total

1.  Evaluation of video gray-scale display.

Authors:  R D Nawfel; K H Chan; D J Wagenaar; P F Judy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  A time-delay integration charge-coupled device camera for slot-scanned digital radiography.

Authors:  D W Holdsworth; R K Gerson; A Fenster
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1990 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography.

Authors:  H Fujita; D Y Tsai; T Itoh; K Doi; J Morishita; K Ueda; A Ohtsuka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Restoration of digital multiplane tomosynthesis by a constrained iteration method.

Authors:  U E Ruttimann; R A Groenhuis; R L Webber
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  Analysis of clustered microcalcifications by using a single numeric classifier extracted from mammographic digital images.

Authors:  S S Buchbinder; I S Leichter; P N Bamberger; B Novak; R Lederman; S Fields; D J Behar
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  A genetic algorithm-based method for optimizing the performance of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms.

Authors:  M A Anastasio; H Yoshida; R Nagel; R M Nishikawa; K Doi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Establishing minimum performance standards, calibration intervals, and optimal exposure values for a whole breast digital mammography unit.

Authors:  C Kimme-Smith; C Lewis; M Beifuss; M B Williams; L W Bassett
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  System considerations in CCD-based x-ray imaging for digital chest radiography and digital mammography.

Authors:  S Hejazi; D P Trauernicht
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Scanned-projection digital mammography.

Authors:  R M Nishikawa; G E Mawdsley; A Fenster; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Image quality of a digital chest radiography system based on a selenium detector.

Authors:  U Neitzel; I Maack; S Günther-Kohfahl
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  4 in total

1.  A perceptual evaluation of JPEG 2000 image compression for digital mammography: contrast-detail characteristics.

Authors:  Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham; Sandra M Waldrop; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Patient dose in full-field digital mammography: an Italian survey.

Authors:  Gisella Gennaro; Paola Baldelli; Angelo Taibi; Cosimo Di Maggio; Mauro Gambaccini
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Sparse-view, short-scan, dedicated cone-beam breast computed tomography: image quality assessment.

Authors:  Hsin Wu Tseng; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2020-09-28

4.  Radiation dosimetry of a clinical prototype dedicated cone-beam breast CT system with offset detector.

Authors:  Hsin Wu Tseng; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 4.506

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.