Literature DB >> 9847550

Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: word frequency effects and individual differences.

H H Schilling1, K Rayner, J I Chumbley.   

Abstract

Performance on three different tasks was compared: naming, lexical decision, and reading (with eye fixation times on a target word measured). We examined the word frequency effect for a common set of words for each task and each subject. Naming and reading (particularly gaze duration) yielded similar frequency effects for the target words. The frequency effect found in lexical decision was greater than that found in naming and in eye fixation times. In all tasks, there was a correlation between the frequency effect and average response time. In general, the results suggest that both the naming and the lexical decision tasks yield data about word recognition processes that are consistent with effects found in eye fixations during silent reading.

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9847550     DOI: 10.3758/bf03201199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  21 in total

1.  Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; M Lesch; R K Morris; K Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The effects of stimulus attributes upon latency of word recognition.

Authors:  J T Richardson
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  1976-08

3.  The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: evidence from eye fixations and naming times.

Authors:  J Altarriba; J F Kroll; A Sholl; K Rayner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-07

4.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models.

Authors:  K Rayner; S C Sereno; G E Raney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Predicting reading performance from neuroimaging profiles: the cerebral basis of phonological effects in printed word identification.

Authors:  K R Pugh; B A Shaywitz; S E Shaywitz; D P Shankweiler; L Katz; J M Fletcher; P Skudlarski; R K Fulbright; R T Constable; R A Bronen; C Lacadie; J C Gore
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: effects of word frequency.

Authors:  A W Inhoff; K Rayner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-12

7.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

8.  A word's meaning affects the decision in lexical decision.

Authors:  J I Chumbley; D A Balota
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-11

9.  Children's and adults' use of spelling-sound information in three reading tasks.

Authors:  G S Waters; M S Seidenberg; M Bruck
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-05

10.  The time course of phonological code activation in two writing systems.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-02
View more
  63 in total

1.  Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  J Wiley; K Rayner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-09

2.  Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task?

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Eva Rosa; Consolación Gómez
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-01

3.  Why does removing inter-word spaces produce reading deficits? The role of parafoveal processing.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Erik D Reichle; Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

4.  Single-Word Recognition Need Not Depend on Single-Word Features: Narrative Coherence Counteracts Effects of Single-Word Features that Lexical Decision Emphasizes.

Authors:  Dan W Teng; Sebastian Wallot; Damian G Kelty-Stephen
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-12

5.  Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Sarah J White; Denis Drieghe; Elizabeth C Hollway; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Word frequency and predictability effects in reading French: an evaluation of the E-Z Reader model.

Authors:  Sébastien Miellet; Laurent Sparrow; Sara C Sereno
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

7.  Eye movements and non-canonical reading: comments on.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek; Simon P Liversedge; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Task effects reveal cognitive flexibility responding to frequency and predictability: evidence from eye movements in reading and proofreading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Klinton Bicknell; Ian Howard; Roger Levy; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-01-14

9.  Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Tessa Warren; Kerry McConnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02

10.  Using E-Z Reader to examine the consequences of fixation-location measurement error.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Denis Drieghe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.