Literature DB >> 11958353

Is the go/no-go lexical decision task an alternative to the yes/no lexical decision task?

Manuel Perea1, Eva Rosa, Consolación Gómez.   

Abstract

In the go/no-go lexical decision task (LDT), participants are instructed to respond as quickly as they can when a word is presented and not to respond if a nonword is presented. By minimizing part of the response selection process in the experimental task, the impact of response decision time on the obtained lexical decision time is probably reduced relative to the standard yes/no LDT (Gordon, 1983). Experiments 1 and 2 show that the go/no-go LDT is sensitive to the effects of word frequency and associative priming--the magnitude of these effects is similar with the two tasks. More important, the go/no-go LDT has a number of advantages with respect to the "standard" yes/no LDT: It offers faster response times, more accurate responding, and fewer processing demands than does the yes/no task. Accordingly, the go/no-go task appears to be an excellent alternative to the standard yes/no task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11958353     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  25 in total

1.  The effects of "neighborhood size" in reading and lexical decision.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; M Perea; K S Binder
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Effects of word frequency and spelling-to-sound regularity in naming with and without preceding lexical decision.

Authors:  Y Hino; S J Lupker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Effect of response programming on hemispheric differences in lexical decision.

Authors:  G Measso; E Zaidel
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.139

4.  The effects of neighborhood frequency in reading and lexical decision.

Authors:  M Perea; A Pollatsek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Pathway selection's utility for control of word recognition.

Authors:  P Gibbs; G C Van Orden
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Where are the effects of frequency in visual word recognition tasks? Right where we said they were! Comment on Monsell, Doyle, and Haggard (1989).

Authors:  D A Balota; J I Chumbley
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1990-06

7.  Evidence for the use of assembled phonology in accessing the meaning of printed words.

Authors:  M F Lesch; A Pollatsek
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.051

8.  On the speed of mental processes.

Authors:  F C Donders
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1969

9.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; A D Well
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect.

Authors:  K R Paap; S L Newsome; J E McDonald; R W Schvaneveldt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  15 in total

1.  The effect of semantic distance in yes/no and go/no-go semantic categorization tasks.

Authors:  Paul D Siakaluk; Lori Buchanan; Chris Westbury
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-01

2.  One process is not enough! A speed-accuracy tradeoff study of recognition memory.

Authors:  Angela Boldini; Riccardo Russo; S E Avons
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-04

3.  Bilingualism and attention: a study of balanced and unbalanced bilingual deaf users of American Sign Language and English.

Authors:  Poorna Kushalnagar; H Julia Hannay; Arturo E Hernandez
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2010-04-18

4.  Masked nonword repetition effects in yes/no and go/no-go lexical decision: a test of the evidence accumulation and deadline accounts.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Pablo Gómez; Isabel Fraga
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-06

5.  Are age-of-acquisition effects on object naming due simply to differences in object recognition? Comments on levelt (2002).

Authors:  Patrick Bonin; Maryène Chalard; Alain Méot; Christopher Barry
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07

6.  Reversing the picture superiority effect: a speed-accuracy trade-off study of recognition memory.

Authors:  Angela Boldini; Riccardo Russo; Sahiba Punia; S E Avons
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-01

7.  A model of the go/no-go task.

Authors:  Pablo Gomez; Roger Ratcliff; Manuel Perea
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2007-08

8.  Effect of syllabic neighbourhood as a function of syllabic neighbour length.

Authors:  Fabienne Chetail; Stéphanie Mathey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-10

9.  The resolution of visual noise in word recognition.

Authors:  Hye K Pae; Yong-Won Lee
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2015-06

10.  Early Effect of Phonological Information in Korean Visual Word Recognition: An ERP Investigation with Transposed Letters.

Authors:  Youan Kwon; Changhwan Lee; Jini Tae; Yoonhyoung Lee
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2018-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.