Literature DB >> 8865619

Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models.

K Rayner1, S C Sereno, G E Raney.   

Abstract

Two classes of models have been proposed to account for eye movement control during reading. Proponents of the 1st class of model claim that the decision of when to move the eyes (reflected in fixation duration) is primarily influenced by the status of on-line language processing such as lexical access. Supporters of the 2nd class of model, however, maintain that (a) lower level oculomotor factors such as fixation location govern the decision of when to move the eyes and (b) lexical variables exert only a weak influence. In this study, fixation duration on low-and high-frequency target words was examined as a function of fixation location and the number of fixations on a target word. The data are inconsistent with an oculomotor model.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8865619     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.22.5.1188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  65 in total

1.  Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: evidence from priming and eye fixations.

Authors:  A R Schmauder; R K Morris; D V Poynor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-10

2.  Effects of increased letter spacing on word identification and eye guidance during reading.

Authors:  Kevin B Paterson; Timothy R Jordan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-06

3.  Spatial object representation and its use in planning eye movements.

Authors:  Cécile Beauvillain; Dorine Vergilino-Perez; Tania Dükic
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-04-14       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Reexamining the word length effect in visual word recognition: new evidence from the English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  Boris New; Ludovic Ferrand; Christophe Pallier; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-02

5.  LATER predicts saccade latency distributions in reading.

Authors:  R H S Carpenter; Scott A McDonald
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Word frequency and predictability effects in reading French: an evaluation of the E-Z Reader model.

Authors:  Sébastien Miellet; Laurent Sparrow; Sara C Sereno
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

7.  Parafoveal processing in reading: Manipulating n + 1 and n + 2 previews simultaneously.

Authors:  Bernhard Angele; Timothy J Slattery; Jinmian Yang; Reinhold Kliegl; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2008-06-01

8.  Effects of Lexical Variables on Silent Reading Comprehension in Individuals With Aphasia: Evidence From Eye Tracking.

Authors:  Gayle DeDe
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Examining Eye Movements in Visual Search through Clusters of Objects in a Circular Array.

Authors:  Carrick C Williams; Alexander Pollatsek; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014

10.  Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Tessa Warren; Kerry McConnell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.