Literature DB >> 11105527

Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: evidence from eye movements.

J Wiley1, K Rayner.   

Abstract

Providing titles for passages improves the comprehension and memorability of text. Titles have generally been thought to facilitate comprehension at later stages of processing. Consistent with prior research, we found that passages presented with titles were better recalled than those without titles. Furthermore, in Experiment 1, the presence of titles led to fewer regressive eye movements, shorter end-of-sentence reading times, and shorter fixation times on target nouns. Experiments 2 and 3, using ambiguous target words, indicated that except when a very infrequent sense of a word is required, titles provide a strong enough context to allow for ambiguous words to be processed as quickly as control words. The results of the three experiments suggest that titles affect processing at both integrative and lexical stages of reading.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11105527     DOI: 10.3758/bf03209349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  17 in total

1.  The effect of clause wrap-up on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; G Kambe; S A Duffy
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-11

2.  Contextual strength and the subordinate bias effect: comment on Martin, Vu, Kellas, and Metcalf.

Authors:  K Rayner; K S Binder; S A Duffy
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1999-11

3.  Influence of contextual features on the activation of ambiguous word meanings.

Authors:  S T Paul; G Kellas; M Martin; M B Clark
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words.

Authors:  K Rayner; L Frazier
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Global semantic expectancy and language comprehension.

Authors:  M S George; S Mannes; J E Hoffinan
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination.

Authors:  K Rayner; A D Well
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-12

7.  Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: word frequency effects and individual differences.

Authors:  H H Schilling; K Rayner; J I Chumbley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-11

Review 8.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading.

Authors:  E D Reichle; A Pollatsek; D L Fisher; K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

10.  Effects of thematic and lexical priming on readers' eye movements.

Authors:  J Hyönä
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  1993-12
View more
  24 in total

1.  Global context effects on processing lexically ambiguous words: evidence from eye fixations.

Authors:  G Kambe; K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-03

2.  LIFG-based attentional control and the resolution of lexical ambiguities in sentence context.

Authors:  Loan C Vuong; Randi C Martin
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  How does background information improve memory for text content?

Authors:  Katherine A Rawson; Walter Kintsch
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-07

4.  Processing of temporal information: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  Mike Rinck; Elena Gámez; José M Díaz; Manuel De Vega
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-01

5.  Effects of syntactic category assignment on lexical ambiguity resolution in reading: an eye movement analysis.

Authors:  Jocelyn R Folk; Robin K Morris
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-01

6.  Situation-evoking stimuli, domain of reference, and the incremental interpretation of lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  Hoang Vu; George Kellas; Eric Petersen; Kim Metcalf
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-12

7.  Readers' use of source information in text comprehension.

Authors:  Jason L G Braasch; Jean-François Rouet; Nicolas Vibert; M Anne Britt
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-04

8.  Contextual knowledge reduces demands on working memory during reading.

Authors:  Lisa M Soederberg Miller; Jason A Cohen; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-09

9.  The time course of contextual influences during lexical ambiguity resolution: evidence from distributional analyses of fixation durations.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

10.  Age differences in the effects of domain knowledge on reading efficiency.

Authors:  Lisa M Soederberg Miller
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2009-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.