Literature DB >> 8757496

The influence of lexical and conceptual constraints on reading mixed-language sentences: evidence from eye fixations and naming times.

J Altarriba1, J F Kroll, A Sholl, K Rayner.   

Abstract

In two experiments, we explored the degree to which sentence context effects operate at a lexical or conceptual level by examining the processing of mixed-language sentences by fluent Spanish-English bilinguals. In Experiment 1, subjects' eye movements were monitored while they read English sentences in which sentence constraint, word frequency, and language of target word were manipulated. A frequency x constraint interaction was found when target words appeared in Spanish, but not in English. First fixation durations were longer for high-frequency Spanish words when these were embedded in high-constraint sentences than in low-constraint sentences. This result suggests that the conceptual restrictions produced by the sentence context were met, but that the lexical restrictions were not. The same result did not occur for low-frequency Spanish words, presumably because the slower access of low-frequency words provided more processing time for the resolution of this conflict. Similar results were found in Experiment 2 using rapid serial visual presentation when subjects named the target words aloud. It appears that sentence context effects are influenced by both semantic/conceptual and lexical information.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8757496     DOI: 10.3758/bf03200936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  19 in total

1.  Phonological codes are used in integrating information across saccades in word identification and reading.

Authors:  A Pollatsek; M Lesch; R K Morris; K Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  The dependence of lexical relatedness effects on syntactic connectedness.

Authors:  P G O'Seaghdha
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.051

3.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models.

Authors:  K Rayner; S C Sereno; G E Raney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Semantic facilitation and translation priming effects in Chinese-English bilinguals.

Authors:  H C Chen; M L Ng
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-07

5.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: effects of word frequency.

Authors:  A W Inhoff; K Rayner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-12

6.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

7.  On priming by a sentence context.

Authors:  K E Stanovich; R F West
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1983-03

8.  Redundancy and word perception during reading.

Authors:  D Zola
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-09

9.  Completion norms for 329 sentence contexts.

Authors:  P A Bloom; I Fischler
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1980-11

10.  Rapid processing of the meaning of sentences.

Authors:  I Fischler; P A Bloom
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1980-05
View more
  30 in total

1.  The influence of global discourse on lexical ambiguity resolution.

Authors:  H Vu; G Kellas; K Metcalf; R Herman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

2.  Situation-evoking stimuli, domain of reference, and the incremental interpretation of lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  Hoang Vu; George Kellas; Eric Petersen; Kim Metcalf
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-12

3.  Word frequency and predictability effects in reading French: an evaluation of the E-Z Reader model.

Authors:  Sébastien Miellet; Laurent Sparrow; Sara C Sereno
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-08

4.  Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination.

Authors:  K Rayner; A D Well
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-12

5.  Sources of sentence constraint on lexical ambiguity resolution.

Authors:  H Vu; G Kellas; S T Paul
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-09

6.  Comparing naming, lexical decision, and eye fixation times: word frequency effects and individual differences.

Authors:  H H Schilling; K Rayner; J I Chumbley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-11

7.  The effect of lexical predictability on distributions of eye fixation durations.

Authors:  Adrian Staub
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

8.  Experience with code-switching modulates the use of grammatical gender during sentence processing.

Authors:  Jorge R Valdés Kroff; Paola E Dussias; Chip Gerfen; Lauren Perrotti; M Teresa Bajo
Journal:  Linguist Approaches Biling       Date:  2017-02-04

9.  The impact of a momentary language switch on bilingual reading: Intense at the switch but merciful downstream for L2 but not L1 readers.

Authors:  Jason W Gullifer; Debra Titone
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2019-03-18       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Form-to-expectation matching effects on first-pass eye movement measures during reading.

Authors:  Thomas A Farmer; Shaorong Yan; Klinton Bicknell; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.