Literature DB >> 3736392

Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

K Rayner, S A Duffy.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1986        PMID： 3736392     DOI： 10.3758/bf03197692

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN： 0090-502X


× No keyword cloud information.
  16 in total

1.  Lexical ambiguity, semantic context, and visual word recognition.

Authors:  R W Schvaneveldt; D E Meyer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Context effects in sentence comprehension: A study of the subjective lexicon.

Authors:  C Conrad
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1974-01

3.  Visual attention in reading: Eye movements reflect cognitive processes.

Authors:  K Rayner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1977-07

4.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: effects of word frequency.

Authors:  A W Inhoff; K Rayner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-12

5.  The effect of factivity on lexical retrieval and postlexical processes during eye fixations in reading.

Authors:  A W Inhoff
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1985-01

6.  Redundancy and word perception during reading.

Authors:  D Zola
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-09

7.  A word's meaning affects the decision in lexical decision.

Authors:  J I Chumbley; D A Balota
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-11

8.  Against definitions.

Authors:  J A Fodor; M F Garrett; E C Walker; C H Parkes
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1980-09

9.  Regression analyses as a tool for studying reading processes: comment on Just and Carpenter's eye fixation theory.

Authors:  R Kliegl; R K Olson; B J Davidson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1982-05

10.  Norms as a tool for the study of homography.

Authors:  D S Gorfein; J M Viviani; J Leddo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1982-09
View more
  170 in total

1.  Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: evidence from priming and eye fixations.

Authors:  A R Schmauder; R K Morris; D V Poynor
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-10

2.  Frequency of meaning use for ambiguous and unambiguous words.

Authors:  Z M Griffin
Journal:  Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput       Date:  1999-08

3.  Meaning resolution processes for words: a parallel independent model.

Authors:  L C Twilley; P Dixon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-03

4.  Effects of titles on the processing of text and lexically ambiguous words: evidence from eye movements.

Authors:  J Wiley; K Rayner
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-09

5.  Turning an advantage into a disadvantage: ambiguity effects in lexical decision versus reading tasks.

Authors:  C D Piercey; S Joordens
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-06

6.  Readers' eye movements distinguish anomalies of form and content.

Authors:  David Braze; Donald Shankweiler; Weijia Ni; Laura Conway Palumbo
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2002-01

7.  Lexical guidance in sentence processing: a note on Adams, Clifton, and Mitchell (1998).

Authors:  R P van Gompel; M J Pickering
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-12

8.  Global context effects on processing lexically ambiguous words: evidence from eye fixations.

Authors:  G Kambe; K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-03

9.  Effects of Lexical Variables on Silent Reading Comprehension in Individuals With Aphasia: Evidence From Eye Tracking.

Authors:  Gayle DeDe
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Task effects reveal cognitive flexibility responding to frequency and predictability: evidence from eye movements in reading and proofreading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Klinton Bicknell; Ian Howard; Roger Levy; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.