Literature DB >> 20873939

Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations.

Adrian Staub1, Sarah J White, Denis Drieghe, Elizabeth C Hollway, Keith Rayner.   

Abstract

Recent research using word recognition paradigms, such as lexical decision and speeded pronunciation, has investigated how a range of variables affect the location and shape of response time distributions, using both parametric and non-parametric techniques. In this article, we explore the distributional effects of a word frequency manipulation on fixation durations in normal reading, making use of data from two recent eye movement experiments (Drieghe, Rayner, & Pollatsek, 2008; White, 2008). The ex-Gaussian distribution provided a good fit to the shape of individual subjects' distributions in both experiments. The frequency manipulation affected both the shift and skew of the distributions, in both experiments, and this conclusion was supported by the nonparametric vincentizing technique. Finally, a new experiment demonstrated that White's (2008) frequency manipulation also affects both shift and skew in response-time distributions in the lexical decision task. These results argue against models of eye movement control in reading that propose that word frequency influences only a subset of fixations and support models in which there is a tight connection between eye movement control and the progress of lexical processing. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20873939      PMCID: PMC2948239          DOI: 10.1037/a0016896

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  28 in total

1.  Quantile maximum likelihood estimation of response time distributions.

Authors:  Andrew Heathcote; Scott Brown; D J K Mewhort
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-06

2.  The effects of frequency and predictability on eye fixations in reading: implications for the E-Z Reader model.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Jane Ashby; Alexander Pollatsek; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  A comment on Heathcote, Brown, and Mewhort's QMLE method for response time distributions.

Authors:  Paul L Speckman; Jeffrey N Rouder
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-06

Review 4.  The E-Z reader model of eye-movement control in reading: comparisons to other models.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 5.  Psychological interpretation of the ex-Gaussian and shifted Wald parameters: a diffusion model analysis.

Authors:  Dora Matzke; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-10

Review 6.  Toward a model of eye movement control in reading.

Authors:  E D Reichle; A Pollatsek; D L Fisher; K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: effects of word frequency.

Authors:  A W Inhoff; K Rayner
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-12

8.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors:  K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1986-05

9.  Group reaction time distributions and an analysis of distribution statistics.

Authors:  R Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 17.737

10.  Methods for dealing with reaction time outliers.

Authors:  R Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 17.737

View more
  28 in total

1.  The time course of contextual influences during lexical ambiguity resolution: evidence from distributional analyses of fixation durations.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

2.  The effect of lexical predictability on distributions of eye fixation durations.

Authors:  Adrian Staub
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-04

3.  An Analysis of the Time Course of Lexical Processing During Reading.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-05-04

4.  The time course of age-of-acquisition effects on eye movements during reading: Evidence from survival analyses.

Authors:  Barbara J Juhasz; Heather Sheridan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-01

5.  Surviving blind decomposition: A distributional analysis of the time-course of complex word recognition.

Authors:  Daniel Schmidtke; Kazunaga Matsuki; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Individual differences in visual word recognition: insights from the English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  Melvin J Yap; David A Balota; Daragh E Sibley; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Schotter; Mallorie Leinenger
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Individual differences in fixation duration distributions in reading.

Authors:  Adrian Staub; Ashley Benatar
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

9.  The poverty of embodied cognition.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Megan H Papesh; Anthony S Barnhart; Whitney A Hansen; Michael C Hout
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

10.  Evidence for direct control of eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Michael Dambacher; Timothy J Slattery; Jinmian Yang; Reinhold Kliegl; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.332

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.