Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: effects of word frequency.

× No keyword cloud information.

22 in total

1. Lexical access during eye fixations in reading: effects of word-initial letter sequence.

Authors: S D Lima; A W Inhoff
Journal: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform Date: 1985-06 Impact factor: 3.332

2. Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading.

Authors: K Rayner; D A Balota; A Pollatsek
Journal: Can J Psychol Date: 1986-12

3. Inferences about eye movement control from the perceptual span in reading.

Authors: A Pollatsek; K Rayner; D A Balota
Journal: Percept Psychophys Date: 1986-08

4. Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity.

Authors: K Rayner; S A Duffy
Journal: Mem Cognit Date: 1986-05

5. Is visual information integrated across successive fixations in reading?

Authors: G W McConkie; D Zola
Journal: Percept Psychophys Date: 1979-03

6. Eye guidance in reading: fixation locations within words.

Authors: K Rayner
Journal: Perception Date: 1979 Impact factor: 1.490

7. Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading.

Authors: K Rayner; A W Inhoff; R E Morrison; M L Slowiaczek; J H Bertera
Journal: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform Date: 1981-02 Impact factor: 3.332

8. Integrating information across eye movements.

Authors: K Rayner; G W McConkie; D Zola
Journal: Cogn Psychol Date: 1980-04 Impact factor: 3.468

9. Regression analyses as a tool for studying reading processes: comment on Just and Carpenter's eye fixation theory.

Authors: R Kliegl; R K Olson; B J Davidson
Journal: Mem Cognit Date: 1982-05

10. Reading without a fovea.

Authors: K Rayner; J H Bertera
Journal: Science Date: 1979-10-26 Impact factor: 47.728

100 in total

1. Lexical processing and text integration of function and content words: evidence from priming and eye fixations.

Authors: A R Schmauder; R K Morris; D V Poynor
Journal: Mem Cognit Date: 2000-10

2. Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task.

Authors: S Gerhand; C Barry
Journal: Mem Cognit Date: 1999-07

3. The word frequency effect for recognition memory and the elevated-attention hypothesis.

Authors: Kenneth J Malmberg; Thomas O Nelson
Journal: Mem Cognit Date: 2003-01

4. Second-language experience modulates first- and second-language word frequency effects: evidence from eye movement measures of natural paragraph reading.

Authors: Veronica Whitford; Debra Titone
Journal: Psychon Bull Rev Date: 2012-02

5. Effects of word frequency and modality on sentence comprehension impairments in people with aphasia.

Authors: Gayle DeDe
Journal: Am J Speech Lang Pathol Date: 2012-01-31 Impact factor: 2.408

6. Effects of increased letter spacing on word identification and eye guidance during reading.

Authors: Kevin B Paterson; Timothy R Jordan
Journal: Mem Cognit Date: 2010-06

7. Why does removing inter-word spaces produce reading deficits? The role of parafoveal processing.

Authors: Heather Sheridan; Erik D Reichle; Eyal M Reingold
Journal: Psychon Bull Rev Date: 2016-10

8. Effects of Lexical Variables on Silent Reading Comprehension in Individuals With Aphasia: Evidence From Eye Tracking.

Authors: Gayle DeDe
Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2017-09-18 Impact factor: 2.297

9. Task effects reveal cognitive flexibility responding to frequency and predictability: evidence from eye movements in reading and proofreading.

Authors: Elizabeth R Schotter; Klinton Bicknell; Ian Howard; Roger Levy; Keith Rayner
Journal: Cognition Date: 2014-01-14

10. Form-to-expectation matching effects on first-pass eye movement measures during reading.

Authors: Thomas A Farmer; Shaorong Yan; Klinton Bicknell; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform Date: 2015-04-27 Impact factor: 3.332