Literature DB >> 19145006

Using E-Z Reader to model the effects of higher level language processing on eye movements during reading.

Erik D Reichle1, Tessa Warren, Kerry McConnell.   

Abstract

Although computational models of eye-movement control during reading have been used to explain how saccadic programming, visual constraints, attention allocation, and lexical processing jointly affect eye movements during reading, these models have largely ignored the issue of how higher level, postlexical language processing affects eye movements. The present article shows how one of these models, E-Z Reader (Pollatsek, Reichle, & Rayner, 2006c), can be augmented to redress this limitation. Simulations show that with a few simple assumptions, the model can account for the fact that effects of higher level language processing are not observed on eye movements when such processing is occurring without difficulty, but can capture the patterns of eye movements that are observed when such processing is slowed or disrupted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19145006      PMCID: PMC2629133          DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.1.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  52 in total

1.  The effect of clause wrap-up on eye movements during reading.

Authors:  K Rayner; G Kambe; S A Duffy
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-11

2.  Eye movement control in reading: accounting for initial fixation locations and refixations within the E-Z Reader model.

Authors:  E D Reichle; K Rayner; A Pollatsek
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  The time course of visual processing: from early perception to decision-making.

Authors:  R VanRullen; S J Thorpe
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Inhibition of saccade return in reading.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Barbara Juhasz; Jane Ashby; Charles Clifton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  SWIFT: a dynamical model of saccade generation during reading.

Authors:  Ralf Engbert; Antje Nuthmann; Eike M Richter; Reinhold Kliegl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Long-range regressions to previously read words are guided by spatial and verbal memory.

Authors:  Ulrich W Weger; Albrecht W Inhoff
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

7.  Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination.

Authors:  K Rayner; A D Well
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-12

8.  Testing an assumption of the E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control during reading: using event-related potentials to examine the familiarity check.

Authors:  Erik D Reichle; Natasha Tokowicz; Ying Liu; Charles A Perfetti
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 4.016

9.  Eye movement control in reading: a comparison of two types of models.

Authors:  K Rayner; S C Sereno; G E Raney
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Eye movement control during reading: a simulation of some word-targeting strategies.

Authors:  R G Reilly; J K O'Regan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  78 in total

1.  Semantic predictability eliminates the transposed-letter effect.

Authors:  Steven G Luke; Kiel Christianson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-05

2.  Eye Movements in Reading: Models and Data.

Authors:  Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 0.957

3.  Syllabic tone articulation influences the identification and use of words during Chinese sentence reading: Evidence from ERP and eye movement recordings.

Authors:  Yingyi Luo; Ming Yan; Shaorong Yan; Xiaolin Zhou; Albrecht W Inhoff
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Why does removing inter-word spaces produce reading deficits? The role of parafoveal processing.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Erik D Reichle; Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

5.  Eye movements and non-canonical reading: comments on.

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Alexander Pollatsek; Simon P Liversedge; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The time course of contextual influences during lexical ambiguity resolution: evidence from distributional analyses of fixation durations.

Authors:  Heather Sheridan; Eyal M Reingold
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-10

7.  Immediate and delayed effects of word frequency and word length on eye movements in reading: a reversed delayed effect of word length.

Authors:  Alexander Pollatsek; Barbara J Juhasz; Erik D Reichle; Debra Machacek; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Examining Eye Movements in Visual Search through Clusters of Objects in a Circular Array.

Authors:  Carrick C Williams; Alexander Pollatsek; Erik D Reichle
Journal:  J Cogn Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2014

9.  Evidence for direct control of eye movements during reading.

Authors:  Michael Dambacher; Timothy J Slattery; Jinmian Yang; Reinhold Kliegl; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Comprehending the impossible: what role do selectional restriction violations play?

Authors:  Tessa Warren; Evelyn Milburn; Nikole D Patson; Michael Walsh Dickey
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 2.331

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.