Literature DB >> 9245361

The intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in human cardiac imaging at 1.5, 3, and 4 T.

H Wen1, T J Denison, R W Singerman, R S Balaban.   

Abstract

Cardiac imaging is inherently demanding on the signal-to-noise performance of the MR scanner and may benefit from high field strengths. However, the complex behavior of the radiofrequency field in the human body at high frequencies makes model-based analyses difficult. This study aims to obtain reliable comparisons of the signal-to-noise profile in the human chest in vivo at 1.5, 3, and 4 T. By using an RF-field-mapping method, it is shown that the intrinsic signal-to-noise increases with the field strength up to 4 T with a less than linear relation. The RF field profile is markedly distorted at 4 T, and the onset of this distortion is dependent on the body size. The high power deposition and the consequences of the RF field distortion are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9245361      PMCID: PMC2896425          DOI: 10.1006/jmre.1996.1072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson        ISSN: 1090-7807            Impact factor:   2.229


  22 in total

1.  Influence of skin depth on NMR coil impedance.

Authors:  M D Harpen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Comparison of 31P MRS and 1H MRI at 1.5 and 2.0 T.

Authors:  M D Boska; B Hubesch; D J Meyerhoff; D B Twieg; G S Karczmar; G B Matson; M W Weiner
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Rapid 31P spectroscopy on a 4-T whole-body system.

Authors:  C J Hardy; P A Bottomley; P B Roemer; R W Redington
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  The field dependence of NMR imaging. II. Arguments concerning an optimal field strength.

Authors:  D I Hoult; C N Chen; V J Sank
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  The field dependence of NMR imaging. I. Laboratory assessment of signal-to-noise ratio and power deposition.

Authors:  C N Chen; V J Sank; S M Cohen; D I Hoult
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  The intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in NMR imaging.

Authors:  W A Edelstein; G H Glover; C J Hardy; R W Redington
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  The modification of the RF field distribution of surface coils by weakly conducting saline samples.

Authors:  C C Hanstock; J A Lunt; P S Allen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  RF magnetic field penetration, phase shift and power dissipation in biological tissue: implications for NMR imaging.

Authors:  P A Bottomley; E R Andrew
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Power deposition in whole-body NMR imaging.

Authors:  P A Bottomley; W A Edelstein
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1981 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Radiofrequency penetration and absorption in the human body: limitations to high-field whole-body nuclear magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  P Röschmann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1987 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  25 in total

1.  Influence of high magnetic field strengths and parallel acquisition strategies on image quality in cardiac 2D CINE magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of 1.5 T vs. 3.0 T.

Authors:  Matthias Gutberlet; Kerstin Schwinge; Patrick Freyhardt; Birgit Spors; Matthias Grothoff; Timm Denecke; Lutz Lüdemann; Ralph Noeske; Thoralf Niendorf; Roland Felix
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-05-05       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Multicontrast-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of atherosclerotic plaques at 3.0 and 1.5 Tesla: ex-vivo comparison with histopathologic correlation.

Authors:  Andreas Koops; Harald Ittrich; Susan Petri; Andrew Priest; Alexander Stork; Ute Lockemann; Gerhard Adam; Christoph Weber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-27       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  High-resolution myocardial perfusion imaging at 3 T: comparison to 1.5 T in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  K Strach; C Meyer; D Thomas; C P Naehle; C Schmitz; H Litt; A Bernstein; B Cheng; H Schild; T Sommer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Local B1+ shimming for prostate imaging with transceiver arrays at 7T based on subject-dependent transmit phase measurements.

Authors:  Gregory J Metzger; Carl Snyder; Can Akgun; Tommy Vaughan; Kamil Ugurbil; Pierre-Francois Van de Moortele
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  High-resolution myocardial stress perfusion at 3 T in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Carsten Meyer; Katharina Strach; Daniel Thomas; Harold Litt; Claas P Nähle; Klaus Tiemann; Ulrich Schwenger; Hans H Schild; Torsten Sommer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Low-Field Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Compelling Case for Cardiac Magnetic Resonance's Future.

Authors:  Orlando P Simonetti; Rizwan Ahmad
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 7.792

7.  Improved MRI of the neonatal heart: feasibility study using a knee coil.

Authors:  Michael Helle; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Inga Voges; Chris Hart; Hans-Heiner Kramer; Carsten Rickers
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2011-08-30

8.  Is contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T superior to 1.5 T for detection of coronary artery disease?

Authors:  Thomas Walcher; Katharina Ikuye; Wolfgang Rottbauer; Jochen Wöhrle; Peter Bernhardt
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  An RF dosimeter for independent SAR measurement in MRI scanners.

Authors:  Di Qian; Abdel-Monem M El-Sharkawy; Paul A Bottomley; William A Edelstein
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  3-T navigator parallel-imaging coronary MR angiography: targeted-volume versus whole-heart acquisition.

Authors:  Shixin Chang; Matthew D Cham; Shuguang Hu; Yi Wang
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.