Literature DB >> 17851665

High-resolution myocardial stress perfusion at 3 T in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Carsten Meyer1, Katharina Strach, Daniel Thomas, Harold Litt, Claas P Nähle, Klaus Tiemann, Ulrich Schwenger, Hans H Schild, Torsten Sommer.   

Abstract

To implement a high-resolution first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging protocol (HRPI) at 3 T, and to evaluate the feasibility, image quality and accuracy of this approach prospectively in patients with suspected CAD. We hypothesized that utilizing the gain in SNR at 3 T to increase spatial resolution would reduce partial volume effects and subendocardial dark rim artifacts in comparison to 1.5 T. HRPI studies were performed on 60 patients using a segmented k-space gradient echo sequence (in plane resolution 1.97 x 1.94 mm(2)). Semiquantitative assessment of dark rim artifacts was performed for the stress studies on a slice-by-slice basis. Qualitative visual analysis was compared to quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) results; hemodynamically significant CAD was defined as stenosis >or=70% at QCA. Dark rim artifacts appeared in 108 of 180 slices (average extent 1.3 +/- 1.2 mm representing 11.8 +/- 10.8% of the transmural myocardial thickness). Sensitivity, specifity, and test accuracy for the detection of significant CAD were 89%,79%, and 85%. HRPI studies at 3 T are feasible in a clinical setting, providing good image quality and high accuracy for detection of significant CAD. The presence of dark rim artifacts does not appear to represent a diagnostic problem when using a HRPI approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17851665     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-007-0746-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  30 in total

1.  Human cardiac imaging at 3 T using phased array coils.

Authors:  R Noeske; F Seifert; K H Rhein; H Rinneberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Steady-state free precession sequences in myocardial first-pass perfusion MR imaging: comparison with TurboFLASH imaging.

Authors:  Peter Hunold; Stefan Maderwald; Holger Eggebrecht; Florian M Vogt; Jörg Barkhausen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Waren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Double inversion black-blood fast spin-echo imaging of the human heart: a comparison between 1.5T and 3.0T.

Authors:  Robert L Greenman; John E Shirosky; Robert V Mulkern; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 5.  Imaging of myocardial perfusion with magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Jörg Barkhausen; Peter Hunold; Markus Jochims; Jörg F Debatin
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  3 Tesla MR imaging provides improved contrast in first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging over a range of gadolinium doses.

Authors:  Philip A Araoz; James F Glockner; Kiaran P McGee; D Dean Potter; V Uma Valeti; David W Stanley; Timothy F Christian
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.364

7.  The intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in human cardiac imaging at 1.5, 3, and 4 T.

Authors:  H Wen; T J Denison; R W Singerman; R S Balaban
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography.

Authors:  J Schwitter; D Nanz; S Kneifel; K Bertschinger; M Büchi; P R Knüsel; B Marincek; T F Lüscher; G K von Schulthess
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-05-08       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Abnormal subendocardial perfusion in cardiac syndrome X detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jonathan R Panting; Peter D Gatehouse; Guang-Zhong Yang; Frank Grothues; David N Firmin; Peter Collins; Dudley J Pennell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-06-20       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Myocardial first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter dose-ranging study.

Authors:  S D Wolff; J Schwitter; R Coulden; M G Friedrich; D A Bluemke; R W Biederman; E T Martin; A J Lansky; F Kashanian; T K F Foo; P E Licato; C R Comeau
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  18 in total

1.  Macrocyclic contrast agents for magnetic resonance imaging of chronic myocardial infarction: intraindividual comparison of gadobutrol and gadoterate meglumine.

Authors:  Moritz Wagner; Rene Schilling; Patrick Doeblin; Alexander Huppertz; Reny Luhur; Carsten Schwenke; Martin Maurer; Bernd Hamm; Matthias Taupitz; Tahir Durmus
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Identification of left ventricular myocardial ischemia and cardiac prognosis with cardiovascular magnetic resonance: updates from 2008 to 2010.

Authors:  Runyawan Chotenimitkhun; W Gregory Hundley
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  [3 tesla magnetic resonance imaging in children and adults with congenital heart disease].

Authors:  I Voges; M Jerosch-Herold; M Helle; C Hart; H-H Kramer; C Rickers
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Differentiation of myocardial ischemia and infarction assessed by dynamic computed tomography perfusion imaging and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography.

Authors:  Yuki Tanabe; Teruhito Kido; Teruyoshi Uetani; Akira Kurata; Tamami Kono; Akiyoshi Ogimoto; Masao Miyagawa; Tsutomu Soma; Kenya Murase; Hirotaka Iwaki; Teruhito Mochizuki
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-02-06       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Multi-modality imaging for the assessment of myocardial perfusion with emphasis on stress perfusion CT and MR imaging.

Authors:  Sung Min Ko; Hweung Kon Hwang; Sung Mok Kim; Ihn Ho Cho
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 2.357

6.  Clinical applications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 3 tesla.

Authors:  Allison G Hays; Michael Schär; Sebastian Kelle
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2009-08

Review 7.  Meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of stress perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance for detection of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Michèle Hamon; Georges Fau; Guillaume Née; Javed Ehtisham; Rémy Morello; Martial Hamon
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Comprehensive adenosine stress perfusion MRI defines the etiology of chest pain in the emergency room: Comparison with nuclear stress test.

Authors:  Jens Vogel-Claussen; Jan Skrok; David Dombroski; Steven M Shea; Edward P Shapiro; Mark Bohlman; Christine H Lorenz; Joao A C Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion MRI and late gadolinium-enhanced MRI for detecting flow-limiting coronary artery disease: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Kakuya Kitagawa; Hajime Sakuma; Motonori Nagata; Shigeo Okuda; Masaharu Hirano; Akihiro Tanimoto; Masaki Matsusako; Joao A C Lima; Sachio Kuribayashi; Kan Takeda
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Towards elimination of the dark-rim artifact in first-pass myocardial perfusion MRI: removing Gibbs ringing effects using optimized radial imaging.

Authors:  Behzad Sharif; Rohan Dharmakumar; Troy LaBounty; Reza Arsanjani; Chrisandra Shufelt; Louise Thomson; C Noel Bairey Merz; Daniel S Berman; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.