Literature DB >> 3784890

The field dependence of NMR imaging. II. Arguments concerning an optimal field strength.

D I Hoult, C N Chen, V J Sank.   

Abstract

Some of the factors involved in the choice of field strength for NMR imaging are examined. The influences of relaxation times and chemical shift upon image quality and signal-to-noise ratio are highlighted, and power deposition is introduced as a significant factor which may limit the flexibility and information available at higher fields as long as 180 degrees echo pulses continue to be necessary. Chemical-shift imaging is examined and found wanting as a means of coping with chemical-shift artifacts, and the use of multiple echoes (albeit with research) in conjunction with multiple-slice techniques is advocated as representing an efficient data-gathering scheme which can improve image signal-to-noise ratio. With such use, a medium field strength (0.5-1 T) is presented as representing, for general purpose imaging of head and torso, the best current compromise when imaging time is of major importance, with the important caveat that new techniques may always invalidate this conclusion.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3784890     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910030509

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  21 in total

1.  Off-resonance saturation MRI of superparamagnetic nanoprobes: theoretical models and experimental validations.

Authors:  Chalermchai Khemtong; Osamu Togao; Jimin Ren; Chase W Kessinger; Masaya Takahashi; A Dean Sherry; Jinming Gao
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 2.229

2.  Ultra-high-field magnetic resonance: Why and when?

Authors:  Ewald Moser
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-01-28

3.  MDEFT imaging of the human brain at 8 T.

Authors:  D G Norris; A Kangarlu; C Schwarzbauer; A M Abduljalil; G Christoforidis; P M Robitaille
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.310

4.  Hyperpolarized krypton-83 as a contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Galina E Pavlovskaya; Zackary I Cleveland; Karl F Stupic; Randall J Basaraba; Thomas Meersmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  In vivo MRI using liquid nitrogen cooled phased array coil at 3.0 T.

Authors:  Wingchi E Kwok; Zhigang You
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Overcoming high-field RF problems with non-magnetic Cartesian feedback transceivers.

Authors:  D I Hoult; D Foreman; G Kolansky; D Kripiakevich
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  The intrinsic signal-to-noise ratio in human cardiac imaging at 1.5, 3, and 4 T.

Authors:  H Wen; T J Denison; R W Singerman; R S Balaban
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.229

8.  Infratentorial brain maturation: a comparison of MRI at 0.5 and 1.5T.

Authors:  K Hittmair; J Kramer; T Rand; G Bernert; D Wimberger
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 9.  Sodium and T1rho MRI for molecular and diagnostic imaging of articular cartilage.

Authors:  Arijitt Borthakur; Eric Mellon; Sampreet Niyogi; Walter Witschey; J Bruce Kneeland; Ravinder Reddy
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.044

10.  Oxymetry deep in tissues with low-frequency electron paramagnetic resonance.

Authors:  H J Halpern; C Yu; M Peric; E Barth; D J Grdina; B A Teicher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-12-20       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.