Literature DB >> 24320534

An RF dosimeter for independent SAR measurement in MRI scanners.

Di Qian1, Abdel-Monem M El-Sharkawy, Paul A Bottomley, William A Edelstein.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The monitoring and management of radio frequency (RF) exposure is critical for ensuring magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) safety. Commercial MRI scanners can overestimate specific absorption rates (SAR) and improperly restrict clinical MRI scans or the application of new MRI sequences, while underestimation of SAR can lead to tissue heating and thermal injury. Accurate scanner-independent RF dosimetry is essential for measuring actual exposure when SAR is critical for ensuring regulatory compliance and MRI safety, for establishing RF exposure while evaluating interventional leads and devices, and for routine MRI quality assessment by medical physicists. However, at present there are no scanner-independent SAR dosimeters.
METHODS: An SAR dosimeter with an RF transducer comprises two orthogonal, rectangular copper loops and a spherical MRI phantom. The transducer is placed in the magnet bore and calibrated to approximate the resistive loading of the scanner's whole-body birdcage RF coil for human subjects in Philips, GE and Siemens 3 tesla (3T) MRI scanners. The transducer loop reactances are adjusted to minimize interference with the transmit RF field (B1) at the MRI frequency. Power from the RF transducer is sampled with a high dynamic range power monitor and recorded on a computer. The deposited power is calibrated and tested on eight different MRI scanners. Whole-body absorbed power vs weight and body mass index (BMI) is measured directly on 26 subjects.
RESULTS: A single linear calibration curve sufficed for RF dosimetry at 127.8 MHz on three different Philips and three GE 3T MRI scanners. An RF dosimeter operating at 123.2 MHz on two Siemens 3T scanners required a separate transducer and a slightly different calibration curve. Measurement accuracy was ∼3%. With the torso landmarked at the xiphoid, human adult whole-body absorbed power varied approximately linearly with patient weight and BMI. This indicates that whole-body torso SAR is on average independent of the imaging subject, albeit with fluctuations.
CONCLUSIONS: Our 3T RF dosimeter and transducers accurately measure RF exposure in body-equivalent loads and provide scanner-independent assessments of whole-body RF power deposition for establishing safety compliance useful for MRI sequence and device testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24320534      PMCID: PMC3843752          DOI: 10.1118/1.4829527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  40 in total

1.  B1 field homogeneity and SAR calculations for the birdcage coil.

Authors:  T S Ibrahim; R Lee; B A Baertlein; P M Robitaille
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Analysis of B1 field profiles and SAR values for multi-strut transverse electromagnetic RF coils in high field MRI applications.

Authors:  T S Ibrahim; A M Abduljalil; B A Baertlein; R Lee; P M Robitaill
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  7T vs. 4T: RF power, homogeneity, and signal-to-noise comparison in head images.

Authors:  J T Vaughan; M Garwood; C M Collins; W Liu; L DelaBarre; G Adriany; P Andersen; H Merkle; R Goebel; M B Smith; K Ugurbil
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  RF safety of wires in interventional MRI: using a safety index.

Authors:  Christopher J Yeung; Robert C Susil; Ergin Atalar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Neurostimulators: potential for excessive heating of deep brain stimulation electrodes during magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  A R Rezai; D Finelli; P Rugieri; J Tkach; J A Nyenhuis; F G Shellock
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  RF heating due to conductive wires during MRI depends on the phase distribution of the transmit field.

Authors:  Christopher J Yeung; Robert C Susil; Ergin Atalar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 7.  Radiofrequency energy-induced heating during MR procedures: a review.

Authors:  F G Shellock
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Comparison of cardiac MRI on 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla clinical whole body systems.

Authors:  Denise P Hinton; Lawrence L Wald; John Pitts; Franz Schmitt
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 6.016

9.  Temperature and SAR calculations for a human head within volume and surface coils at 64 and 300 MHz.

Authors:  Christopher M Collins; Wanzhan Liu; Jinghua Wang; Rolf Gruetter; J Thomas Vaughan; Kamil Ugurbil; Michael B Smith
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Evaluation of specific absorption rate as a dosimeter of MRI-related implant heating.

Authors:  Kenneth B Baker; Jean A Tkach; John A Nyenhuis; Michael Phillips; Frank G Shellock; Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez; Ali R Rezai
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.813

View more
  8 in total

1.  A high duty-cycle, multi-channel, power amplifier for high-resolution radiofrequency encoded magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Aaron R Purchase; Tadeusz Pałasz; Hongwei Sun; Jonathan C Sharp; Boguslaw Tomanek
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.310

2.  Evaluation of epidural and peripheral nerve catheter heating during magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Sean Owens; M Arcan Erturk; Jean-Pierre P Ouanes; Jamie D Murphy; Christopher L Wu; Paul A Bottomley
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.288

Review 3.  Improving Safety of MRI in Patients with Deep Brain Stimulation Devices.

Authors:  Alexandre Boutet; Clement T Chow; Keshav Narang; Gavin J B Elias; Clemens Neudorfer; Jürgen Germann; Manish Ranjan; Aaron Loh; Alastair J Martin; Walter Kucharczyk; Christopher J Steele; Ileana Hancu; Ali R Rezai; Andres M Lozano
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Bench to bore ramifications of inter-subject head differences on RF shimming and specific absorption rates at 7T.

Authors:  Benjamin M Hardy; Rana Banik; Xinqiang Yan; Adam W Anderson
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.130

5.  Use of a radio frequency shield during 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging: experimental evaluation.

Authors:  Christopher P Favazza; Deirdre M King; Heidi A Edmonson; Joel P Felmlee; Phillip J Rossman; Nicholas J Hangiandreou; Robert E Watson; Krzysztof R Gorny
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-10-29

6.  MRI scanner-independent specific absorption rate measurements using diffusion coefficients.

Authors:  Youngseob Seo; Zhiyue J Wang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  EMF exposure variation among MRI sequences from pediatric examination protocols.

Authors:  Jennifer Frankel; Kjell Hansson Mild; Johan Olsrud; Jonna Wilén
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.010

8.  Measurement and evaluation of specific absorption rate and temperature elevation caused by an artificial hip joint during MRI scanning.

Authors:  Youngseob Seo; Zhiyue J Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.