Literature DB >> 8583261

Patient desire for information and decision making in health care decisions: the Autonomy Preference Index and the Health Opinion Survey.

R F Nease1, W B Brooks.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare results on the Autonomy Preference Index (API) and the Health Opinion Survey (HOS), two instruments that measure patient desire for information and involvement in decision making.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey.
SETTING: University-based primary care outpatient longitudinal and acute care clinic. PATIENTS: 167 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia, back pain, or mild hypertension seen from October 1991 to December 1992.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: On the API and the HOS (both scaled from 0 to 1), the patients had intermediate desire for involvement in decision making (median API: 0.42; HOS: 0.36) and higher desire for information (median API: 0.97; HOS: 0.57). With either instrument, the desire for information exceeded that for involvement in decision making (p < 0.0001). The API information scores were higher than the HOS information scores (p < 0.0001), probably because the HOS focuses on patient behavior rather than desire. Variation in desire for information and involvement in decision making was substantial and largely unexplained.
CONCLUSIONS: Most patients have a high desire for information, the desire for information and involvement in decision making varies substantially among patients, and the API is preferable to the HOS for researchers interested in focusing solely on patient desire for information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8583261     DOI: 10.1007/bf02602742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  25 in total

1.  Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

Authors:  J Ende; L Kazis; A Ash; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Assessing patients' utilities. Can the ends justify the means?

Authors:  A G Mulley
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Autonomy and paternalism in medicine.

Authors:  B J Pollard
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1993 Dec 6-20       Impact factor: 7.738

4.  Preferences for involvement in medical decision-making: situational and demographic influences.

Authors:  S C Thompson; J S Pitts; L Schwankovsky
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  1993-12-31

5.  Health care involvement preferences and social-emotional recovery of male coronary-artery-bypass patients.

Authors:  H I Mahler; J A Kulik
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.267

6.  Type of hemodialysis and preference for behavioral involvement: interactive effects on adherence in end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  A J Christensen; T W Smith; C W Turner; J M Holman; M C Gregory
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Watchful waiting vs immediate transurethral resection for symptomatic prostatism. The importance of patients' preferences.

Authors:  M J Barry; A G Mulley; F J Fowler; J W Wennberg
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-05-27       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Symptom status and quality of life following prostatectomy.

Authors:  F J Fowler; J E Wennberg; R P Timothy; M J Barry; A G Mulley; D Hanley
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-05-27       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  The importance of patient preferences in the measurement of health care satisfaction.

Authors:  C K Ross; C A Steward; J M Sinacore
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions.

Authors:  H J Sutherland; H A Llewellyn-Thomas; G A Lockwood; D L Tritchler; J E Till
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  27 in total

1.  Modeling patients' acceptance of provider-delivered e-health.

Authors:  E Vance Wilson; Nancy K Lankton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Patient-centered discussions about prostate cancer screening: a real-world approach.

Authors:  Barak Gaster; Kelly Edwards; Susan Brown Trinidad; Thomas H Gallagher; Clarence H Braddock
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Women's preferences for information and complication seriousness ratings related to elective medical procedures.

Authors:  P K Coleman; D C Reardon; M B Lee
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Patients and medical statistics. Interest, confidence, and ability.

Authors:  Steven Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Uncertainty, responsibility, and the evolution of the physician/patient relationship.

Authors:  M S Henry
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 6.  Physician, patient, and contextual factors affecting treatment decisions in older adults with cancer and models of decision making: a literature review.

Authors:  Joseph D Tariman; Donna L Berry; Barbara Cochrane; Ardith Doorenbos; Karen G Schepp
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.172

7.  Do patients want to be informed? Do they want to decide?

Authors:  J D Stoeckle
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  A multimedia intervention on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and advance directives.

Authors:  R Yamada; A T Galecki; S D Goold; R V Hogikyan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Participation preferences of patients with acute and chronic conditions.

Authors:  Johannes Hamann; Bruno Neuner; Jürgen Kasper; Andrea Vodermaier; Andreas Loh; Anja Deinzer; Christoph Heesen; Werner Kissling; Raymonde Busch; Roland Schmieder; Claudia Spies; Cornelia Caspari; Martin Härter
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Health research participants' preferences for receiving research results.

Authors:  Christopher R Long; M Kathryn Stewart; Thomas V Cunningham; T Scott Warmack; Pearl A McElfish
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.486

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.