Literature DB >> 16877620

Women's preferences for information and complication seriousness ratings related to elective medical procedures.

P K Coleman1, D C Reardon, M B Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the preferences of patients for information related to elective procedures.
METHODS: A survey was carried out using a sample of 187 women. The majority of whom were on a low-income, who obtained obstetric or gynaecological services at St Joseph Regional Medical Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, while they were in a waiting room.
RESULTS: Many of the complications, including those that are uncommon and less serious, were considered to be relevant to the medical decisions of most patients. Average seriousness ratings associated with complications of various elective procedures were in the range of moderate to high. A frequency of complications of 1:100 or higher would factor into most women's elective treatment decisions. Women indicated a preference for receiving as much or more information pertaining to complications associated with particular elective obstetric or gynaecological procedures as other elective procedures.
CONCLUSION: Most women wish to be informed of risks and treatment alternatives, rate many complications as serious, and are likely to use information provided to make elective treatment decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16877620      PMCID: PMC2563388          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2005.014274

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  11 in total

1.  Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

Authors:  J Ende; L Kazis; A Ash; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 2.  Risk communication in clinical practice: putting cancer in context.

Authors:  L M Schwartz; S Woloshin; H G Welch
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1999

3.  Patients' interpretations of probability terms.

Authors:  D J Mazur; D H Hickam
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1991 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Health decision aids to facilitate shared decision making in office practice.

Authors:  Michael J Barry
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 5.  Preparatory education for informed decision-making in prostate cancer early detection and treatment.

Authors:  R E Myers; E J Kunkel
Journal:  Semin Urol Oncol       Date:  2000-08

6.  Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate?

Authors:  N K Arora; C A McHorney
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Assessing values for health: numeracy matters.

Authors:  S Woloshin; L M Schwartz; M Moncur; S Gabriel; A N Tosteson
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.583

8.  Patient desire for information and decision making in health care decisions: the Autonomy Preference Index and the Health Opinion Survey.

Authors:  R F Nease; W B Brooks
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys.

Authors:  J Benbassat; D Pilpel; M Tidhar
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.104

10.  Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Russell P Harris; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The abortion and mental health controversy: A comprehensive literature review of common ground agreements, disagreements, actionable recommendations, and research opportunities.

Authors:  David C Reardon
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2018-10-29

2.  Gender and Racial Characteristics of Patients Referred to a Tertiary Atrial Fibrillation Center.

Authors:  Pamela K Mason; Liza Moorman; Douglas E Lake; J Michael Mangrum; John P DiMarco; John D Ferguson; Srijoy Mahapatra; Kenneth C Bilchick; David Wiggins; J Paul Mounsey; J Randall Moorman
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2010-12-15

3.  Design and national dissemination of the StrongWomen Community Strength Training Program.

Authors:  Rebecca A Seguin; Christina D Economos; Raymond Hyatt; Ruth Palombo; Peter N T Reed; Miriam E Nelson
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 2.830

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.