Literature DB >> 17986072

Participation preferences of patients with acute and chronic conditions.

Johannes Hamann1, Bruno Neuner, Jürgen Kasper, Andrea Vodermaier, Andreas Loh, Anja Deinzer, Christoph Heesen, Werner Kissling, Raymonde Busch, Roland Schmieder, Claudia Spies, Cornelia Caspari, Martin Härter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is little knowledge as to whether the chronicity of a disease affects patients' desire for participation. AIM: To study whether participation preferences vary according to the type of disease. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Data of 1,393 patients from six trials with different medical conditions (hypertension, depression, breast cancer, schizophrenia, multiple sclerosis, minor traumas) were pooled and analysed, using multiple regression analysis controlling for socio-demographic variables.
RESULTS: Younger age, better education as well as female gender accounted for a small but statistically significantly greater desire to participate. Patients suffering from multiple sclerosis (MS) exhibited significantly higher participation preferences than the other diagnostic groups. There were no major differences between the other diagnostic groups. Age, gender, education and diagnosis explained only 14% of the variance.
CONCLUSIONS: We found no clear differences between chronic and acute conditions. However, patients suffering from MS, a chronic condition, were clearly different from all other diagnostic groups. The reasons for this difference remain unclear. The predictive value of socio-demography and type of illness is low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17986072      PMCID: PMC5060420          DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00458.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Expect        ISSN: 1369-6513            Impact factor:   3.377


  10 in total

1.  A new model of medical decisions: exploring the limits of shared decision making.

Authors:  Simon N Whitney
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

Authors:  J Ende; L Kazis; A Ash; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Optimal matches of patient preferences for information, decision-making and interpersonal behavior: evidence, models and interventions.

Authors:  Donald J Kiesler; Stephen M Auerbach
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-12-20

4.  The Control Preferences Scale.

Authors:  L F Degner; J A Sloan; P Venkatesh
Journal:  Can J Nurs Res       Date:  1997

Review 5.  Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.

Authors:  A Coulter
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  1997-04

6.  Impact of age, health locus of control and psychological co-morbidity on patients' preferences for shared decision making in general practice.

Authors:  Antonius Schneider; Thorsten Körner; Michael Mehring; Michel Wensing; Glyn Elwyn; Joachim Szecsenyi
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2006-05

7.  [Measuring shared decision making].

Authors:  Nadja Giersdorf; Andreas Loh; Martin Härter
Journal:  Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich       Date:  2004-03

8.  Assessment of Preferences for self-treatment and information in health care.

Authors:  D S Krantz; A Baum; M v Wideman
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1980-11

9.  Patient desire for information and decision making in health care decisions: the Autonomy Preference Index and the Health Opinion Survey.

Authors:  R F Nease; W B Brooks
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys.

Authors:  J Benbassat; D Pilpel; M Tidhar
Journal:  Behav Med       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.104

  10 in total
  57 in total

1.  Patient involvement in mental health care: one size does not fit all.

Authors:  Else Tambuyzer; Guido Pieters; Chantal Van Audenhove
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  An empirical study of surrogates' preferred level of control over value-laden life support decisions in intensive care units.

Authors:  Sara K Johnson; Christopher A Bautista; Seo Yeon Hong; Lisa Weissfeld; Douglas B White
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  Confirmatory factor analysis and recommendations for improvement of the Autonomy-Preference-Index (API).

Authors:  Daniela Simon; Levente Kriston; Andreas Loh; Claudia Spies; Fueloep Scheibler; Celia Wills; Martin Härter
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Gender-related needs and preferences in cancer care indicate the need for an individualized approach to cancer patients.

Authors:  Hester Wessels; Alexander de Graeff; Klaske Wynia; Miriam de Heus; Cas L J J Kruitwagen; Gerda T G J Woltjer; Saskia C C M Teunissen; Emile E Voest
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-05-27

5.  Information and Decision-Making Needs Among People with Anxiety Disorders: Results of an Online Survey.

Authors:  Sarah Liebherz; Martin Härter; Jörg Dirmaier; Lisa Tlach
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Training patients with schizophrenia to share decisions with their psychiatrists: a randomized-controlled trial.

Authors:  Johannes Hamann; Anna Parchmann; Nina Sassenberg; Katharina Bronner; Margot Albus; Alwin Richter; Sandra Hoppstock; Werner Kissling
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 4.328

7.  Why are you here again? Concordance between consumers and providers about the primary concern in recurring psychiatric visits.

Authors:  Kelsey A Bonfils; Sadaaki Fukui; Erin L Adams; Heidi M Hedrick; Michelle P Salyers
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  Mutual influence in shared decision making: a collaborative study of patients and physicians.

Authors:  Beth A Lown; William D Clark; Janice L Hanson
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-02-22       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  What can patients do to facilitate shared decision making? A qualitative study of patients with depression or schizophrenia and psychiatrists.

Authors:  Johannes Hamann; S Kohl; R McCabe; M Bühner; R Mendel; M Albus; J Bernd
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 4.328

10.  Training of patient and consumer representatives in the basic competencies of evidence-based medicine: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Bettina Berger; Anke Steckelberg; Gabriele Meyer; Jürgen Kasper; Ingrid Mühlhauser
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.