Literature DB >> 8246642

The importance of patient preferences in the measurement of health care satisfaction.

C K Ross1, C A Steward, J M Sinacore.   

Abstract

The idea that patients will be more satisfied with health care services that are delivered to meet their preferences is central to the concept of health care marketing. Health care providers increasingly use market segmentation and target marketing to optimize the fit between their services and the consumers who receive them. This study evaluates one model for incorporation of patient preferences into the measurement of satisfaction. Using multiple regression analysis, evaluations of three dimensions of health care satisfaction, interpersonal care, technical quality, access to care accounted for 63% of the variance in overall satisfaction. Inclusion of preferences, defined as importance ranks of each dimension, did not improve ability to predict satisfaction. Four preference segments were identified: interpersonal care seekers, access/quality seekers, access seekers and quality seekers. These four subgroups differed significantly on a number of sociodemographic, health status and health service use characteristics but no significant differences were found in satisfaction between preference segments. Patient satisfaction can best be measured as quality evaluations of dimensions without regard to preferences. In considering the merits of market segmentation and target marketing, alternative satisfaction models that link preferences to health care satisfaction or the possibility that preference targeting does not lead to greater satisfaction should be evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8246642     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-199312000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  25 in total

1.  Comprehensive needs assessment tool in cancer (CNAT): the development and validation.

Authors:  Eun-Jung Shim; Kyung-Sook Lee; Jong-Hyock Park; Jae-Hyun Park
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-11-14       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  How well do guidelines incorporate evidence on patient preferences?

Authors:  Christopher A K Y Chong; Ing-je Chen; Gary Naglie; Murray D Krahn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  In the eyes of the beholder: population perspectives on performance priorities for primary care in Canada.

Authors:  Whitney Berta; Jan Barnsley; Adalsteinn Brown; Michael Murray
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2008-11

4.  Caregivers' Priorities and Observed Outcomes of Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Medication for Their Children.

Authors:  Melissa Ross; Vy Nguyen; John F P Bridges; Xinyi Ng; Gloria Reeves; Emily Frosch; Susan dosReis
Journal:  J Dev Behav Pediatr       Date:  2018 Feb/Mar       Impact factor: 2.225

Review 5.  A systematic review of satisfaction and pediatric obesity treatment: new avenues for addressing attrition.

Authors:  Joseph A Skelton; Megan Bennett Irby; Ann M Geiger
Journal:  J Healthc Qual       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 1.095

6.  Segmenting patients and physicians using preferences from discrete choice experiments.

Authors:  Ken Deal
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Patient evaluations of accessibility and co-ordination in general practice in Europe.

Authors:  Michel Wensing; Jan Hermsen; Richard Grol; Joachim Szecsenyi
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Patient desire for information and decision making in health care decisions: the Autonomy Preference Index and the Health Opinion Survey.

Authors:  R F Nease; W B Brooks
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Patient satisfaction and normative decision theory.

Authors:  P F Brennan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

10.  Combination therapy or monotherapy for the depressed type of schizoaffective disorder.

Authors:  Lubomira Izáková; Ivan Andre; Angelos Halaris
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 2.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.