Literature DB >> 2644407

Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

J Ende1, L Kazis, A Ash, M A Moskowitz.   

Abstract

An instrument for measuring patients' preferences for two identified dimensions of autonomy, their desire to make medical decisions and their desire to be informed, was developed and tested for reliability and validity. The authors found that patients prefer that decisions be made principally by their physicians, not themselves, although they very much want to be informed. There was no correlation between patients' decision making and information-seeking preferences (r = 0.09; p = 0.15). For the majority of patients, their desire to make decisions declined as they faced more severe illness. Older patients had less desire than younger patients to make decisions and to be informed (p less than 0.0001 for each comparison). However, only 19% of the variance among patients for decision making and 12% for information seeking could be accounted for by stepwise regression models using sociodemographic and health status variables as predictors. The conceptual and clinical implications of these findings are discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autonomy Preference Index; Boston University Medical Center; Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2644407     DOI: 10.1007/bf02596485

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  24 in total

1.  Dimensions of patient attitudes regarding doctors and medical care services.

Authors:  J E Ware; M K Snyder
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1975-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Culture, illness, and care: clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural research.

Authors:  A Kleinman; L Eisenberg; B Good
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  What we do and do not know about informed consent.

Authors:  A Meisel; L H Roth
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1981-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Practitioner or patient--who's in charge?

Authors:  M R Haug; B Lavin
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1981-09

5.  Arrogance.

Authors:  F J Ingelfinger
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1980-12-25       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Active patient orientation and outcomes in hypertensive treatment: application of a socio-organizational perspective.

Authors:  B A Schulman
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-03       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Disclosure of information to patients in medical care.

Authors:  R R Faden; C Becker; C Lewis; J Freeman; A I Faden
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  Do patients want to participate in medical decision making?

Authors:  W M Strull; B Lo; G Charles
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-12-07       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Preferences for treatment approaches in medical care. College students versus diabetic outpatients.

Authors:  L Pendleton; W C House
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  Improvement of medication compliance in uncontrolled hypertension.

Authors:  R B Haynes; D L Sackett; E S Gibson; D W Taylor; B C Hackett; R S Roberts; A L Johnson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1976-06-12       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  211 in total

1.  Editorial: special conference issue.

Authors:  Cathy Charles; Amiram Gafni; Tim Whelan
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Measuring patients' preferences for treatment and perceptions of risk.

Authors:  A Bowling; S Ebrahim
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  2001-09

Review 3.  Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures.

Authors:  Adrian Edwards; Glyn Elwyn; Al Mulley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-06

4.  Openness with patients: a categorical imperative to correct an imbalance.

Authors:  Anthony S Kessel; Michael J Crawford
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.525

5.  A role for the sick role. Patient preferences regarding information and participation in clinical decision-making.

Authors:  A M Stiggelbout; G M Kiebert
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Arthritis patients' motives for (not) wanting to be involved in medical decision-making and the factors that hinder or promote patient involvement.

Authors:  Ingrid Nota; Constance H C Drossaert; Erik Taal; Mart A F J van de Laar
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.980

7.  Medical tests: women's reported and preferred decision-making roles and preferences for information on benefits, side-effects and false results.

Authors:  Heather M Davey; Alexandra L Barratt; Elizabeth Davey; Phyllis N Butow; Sally Redman; Nehmat Houssami; Glenn P Salkeld
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Developing patient-centred information for back pain sufferers.

Authors:  Claire Glenton
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Do patients wish to be involved in decision making in the consultation? A cross sectional survey with video vignettes.

Authors:  B McKinstry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-10-07

10.  Views of treatment decision making from adolescents with chronic illnesses and their parents: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jennifer M Knopf; Richard W Hornung; Gail B Slap; Robert F DeVellis; Maria T Britto
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.