Literature DB >> 21079223

Patient-centered discussions about prostate cancer screening: a real-world approach.

Barak Gaster1, Kelly Edwards, Susan Brown Trinidad, Thomas H Gallagher, Clarence H Braddock.   

Abstract

National guidelines recommend that primary care providers discuss the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening with their patients but give little guidance on how to fit such a complex discussion into a busy clinic encounter. The authors propose a process-oriented approach (Ask-Tell-Ask) that promotes tailored conversations and value-based recommendations. The Ask-Tell-Ask approach includes diagnosing a patient's informational needs, providing targeted education based on those needs, and making a shared decision about testing. This time-efficient model emphasizes the provider's role as an interactive guide rather than a one-way supplier of information. Although there is no way to make these discussions simple, this streamlined strategy can help patients and providers efficiently negotiate the complex and important decision of screening for prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21079223      PMCID: PMC3065982          DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-10-201011160-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  47 in total

1.  Primary care: is there enough time for prevention?

Authors:  Kimberly S H Yarnall; Kathryn I Pollak; Truls Østbye; Katrina M Krause; J Lloyd Michener
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  What patients should be told before agreeing to a blood test that could change their lives.

Authors:  James A Talcott
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.649

3.  Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics.

Authors:  C H Braddock; K A Edwards; N M Hasenberg; T L Laidley; W Levinson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999 Dec 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Preparatory education for informed decision-making in prostate cancer early detection and treatment.

Authors:  R E Myers; E J Kunkel
Journal:  Semin Urol Oncol       Date:  2000-08

5.  Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate?

Authors:  N K Arora; C A McHorney
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Managed care, time pressure, and physician job satisfaction: results from the physician worklife study.

Authors:  M Linzer; T R Konrad; J Douglas; J E McMurray; D E Pathman; E S Williams; M D Schwartz; M Gerrity; W Scheckler; J A Bigby; E Rhodes
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Physician-patient discussions of controversial cancer screening tests.

Authors:  A S Dunn; K V Shridharani; W Lou; J Bernstein; C R Horowitz
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Shared decision making about screening and chemoprevention. a suggested approach from the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Russell P Harris; Steven H Woolf
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Physician perspectives on the importance of facts men ought to know about prostate-specific antigen testing.

Authors:  Evelyn C Y Chan; Sally W Vernon; Michelle C Haynes; Frederick T O'Donnell; Chul Ahn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Cultural sensitivity and informed decision making about prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Evelyn C Y Chan; Michelle C Haynes; Frederick T O'Donnell; Carolyn Bachino; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2003-12
View more
  8 in total

1.  Let's Talk About Those Herbs You Are Taking: Ethical Considerations for Communication With Patients With Cancer About Complementary and Alternative Medicine.

Authors:  Laura Tenner; Fay J Hlubocky; Charles D Blanke; Thomas W LeBlanc; Jonathan M Marron; Molly M McGinnis; Rebecca A Spence; Lynne P Taylor
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  Impact of a Prostate Specific Antigen Screening Decision Aid on Clinic Function.

Authors:  Christopher A Warlick; Jerica M Berge; Yen-Yi Ho; Mark Yeazel
Journal:  Urol Pract       Date:  2017-11

3.  Theoretical and Pragmatic Adaptation of the 5As Model to Patient-Centered Hypertension Counselling.

Authors:  Jennifer K Carroll; Kevin Fiscella; Andrea Cassells; Mechelle R Sanders; Stephen K Williams; Brianna D'Orazio; Tameir Holder; Subrina Farah; Chamanara Khalida; Jonathan N Tobin
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2018

4.  Essential elements of personalized medicine.

Authors:  Wylie Burke; Susan Brown Trinidad; Nancy A Press
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2013-12-08       Impact factor: 3.498

5.  A simple schema for informed decision making about prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Kelly Edwards; Matthew R Cooperberg; Alvin I Mushlin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Layperson Views about the Design and Evaluation of Decision Aids: A Public Deliberation.

Authors:  Peter H Schwartz; Kieran C O'Doherty; Colene Bentley; Karen K Schmidt; Michael M Burgess
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  Appraising risk in active surveillance of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anne Hogden; Kate Churruca; Frances Rapport; David Gillatt
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.377

8.  Patient and primary care perspectives on hypertension management: short report of a qualitative study in a tribal health system.

Authors:  Krista R Schaefer; Michael R Todd; Susan Brown Trinidad; Renee F Robinson; Denise A Dillard
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 1.228

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.