Literature DB >> 8153035

Preferences for involvement in medical decision-making: situational and demographic influences.

S C Thompson, J S Pitts, L Schwankovsky.   

Abstract

We examined desires to be involved in decisions about one's own medical treatment in a sample of 459 health maintenance organization members. Demographic variables (age, sex and education level) that have been found to be related to decision preferences were also tested. As predicted, respondents expressed a desire to be involved in decisions that do not require medical expertise, but had significantly lower preferences for involvement in decisions that required medical expertise. Younger and better-educated individuals reported a higher desire for involvement, but there were no sex differences in preferences. The higher desire for involvement in decisions not requiring medical knowledge was found both for groups that traditionally have wanted involvement and for those that have not. The implications of the results for patient participation in decision-making are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8153035     DOI: 10.1016/0738-3991(93)90093-c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  39 in total

Review 1.  Patient involvement in patient safety: what factors influence patient participation and engagement?

Authors:  Rachel E Davis; Rosamond Jacklin; Nick Sevdalis; Charles A Vincent
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  The impact of patient autonomy on older adults with asthma.

Authors:  Keerthi R Karamched; Wei Hao; Peter X Song; Laurie Carpenter; Joel Steinberg; Alan P Baptist
Journal:  Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 6.347

3.  The development of picture cards and their use in ascertaining characteristics of Chinese surgical patients' decision-making preferences.

Authors:  Amanda Henderson; David Shum; Wai-Tong Chien
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Empirical evidence that genetic counseling is directive: where do we go from here?

Authors:  B A Bernhardt
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Decision-Making Preferences Among Older Hispanics Participating in a Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening Program.

Authors:  Jennifer C Molokwu; Eribeth Penaranda; Navkiran Shokar
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2017-10

6.  Patient Preferences for Shared Decision Making: Not All Decisions Should Be Shared.

Authors:  Sarah E Lindsay; Aaron Alokozai; Sara L Eppler; Paige Fox; Catherine Curtin; Michael Gardner; Raffi Avedian; Ariel Palanca; Geoffrey D Abrams; Ivan Cheng; Robin N Kamal
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Danish Physicians' Views on the Appropriateness of the Involvement of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Regulatory Decision Making: A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Mikkel Lindskov Sachs; Morten Colding-Jørgensen; Per Helboe; Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong; Sven Frøkjaer; Katarina Jelic; Susanne Kaae
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2019-04

8.  Shared decision making in patients at risk of cancer: the role of domain and numeracy.

Authors:  Yaniv Hanoch; Talya Miron-Shatz; Jonathan J Rolison; Zehra Omer; Elisa Ozanne
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Effect of patient and patient-oncologist relationship characteristics on communication about health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Keri L Rodriguez; Nichole K Bayliss; Stewart C Alexander; Amy S Jeffreys; Maren K Olsen; Kathryn I Pollak; Sarah K Garrigues; James A Tulsky; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Implementing breast cancer decision aids in community sites: barriers and resources.

Authors:  Kerry A Silvia; Elissa M Ozanne; Karen R Sepucha
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.377

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.