Literature DB >> 22201670

Physician, patient, and contextual factors affecting treatment decisions in older adults with cancer and models of decision making: a literature review.

Joseph D Tariman1, Donna L Berry, Barbara Cochrane, Ardith Doorenbos, Karen G Schepp.   

Abstract

PURPOSE/
OBJECTIVES: To review physician, patient, and contextual factors that affect treatment decision making in older adults diagnosed with cancer, and to relate those factors to theoretical models of decision making. DATA SOURCES: PubMed (1966 to April 2010), PsycINFO (1967 to April 2010) and CINAHL® (1982 to April 2010) databases were searched to access relevant medical, psychological, and nursing literature. DATA SYNTHESIS: Physician factors in treatment decisions included physician's personal beliefs and values, medical expertise, practice type, perception of lowered life expectancy, medical factors, power, and communication style. Patient factors included personal beliefs and values, ethnicity, decisional control preferences, previous health-related experience, perception of the decision-making process, and personal factors. Contextual factors included availability of caregiver, insurance, financial status, and geographical barrier.
CONCLUSIONS: A diverse group of factors were identified, which are likely to form a unique framework to understand clinical decision making and plan future investigations in older adult patient populations. Using longitudinal and prospective designs to examine the real-time interplay of patient, physician, and contextual factors will enable a better understanding of how those divergent factors influence actual treatment decisions. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Oncology nurses can advocate autonomous (patient-driven), shared, or family-controlled treatment decisions, depending on an older patient's decisional role preference. Nurses can support patient autonomy during treatment decision making by coaching patients to engage in discussion of various evidence-based treatment options and a comprehensive discussion of the probability of success for each option with specialist providers. Oncology nurses may be able to promote treatment decisions that are consistent with a patient's personal preferences and values, with strong consideration of the patient's personal contexts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22201670      PMCID: PMC3247918          DOI: 10.1188/12.ONF.E70-E83

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum        ISSN: 0190-535X            Impact factor:   2.172


  68 in total

Review 1.  The communication goals and needs of cancer patients: a review.

Authors:  Thomas F Hack; Lesley F Degner; Patricia A Parker
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 2.  A communication model of shared decision making: accounting for cancer treatment decisions.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Mary M Step
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.267

3.  Family centred decision making and non-disclosure of diagnosis in a South East Asian oncology practice.

Authors:  Michael F Back; Chan Yiong Huak
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.894

Review 4.  Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christine M Gaston; Geoffrey Mitchell
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 5.  An integrative model of shared decision making in medical encounters.

Authors:  Gregory Makoul; Marla L Clayman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-07-26

6.  The application of the heuristic-systematic processing model to treatment decision making about prostate cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne K Steginga; Stefano Occhipinti
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  The medical decision-making process and the family: the case of breast cancer patients and their husbands.

Authors:  Roy Gilbar; Ora Gilbar
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  2007-04-08       Impact factor: 1.898

Review 8.  Health literacy, communication, and treatment decision-making in older cancer patients.

Authors:  Sunil Amalraj; Chelsea Starkweather; Christopher Nguyen; Arash Naeim
Journal:  Oncology (Williston Park)       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 2.990

Review 9.  Quality of Life in elderly patients with cancer.

Authors:  Massimo Di Maio; Francesco Perrone
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 3.186

10.  Clinician and cancer patient views on patient participation in treatment decision-making: a quantitative and qualitative exploration.

Authors:  A H Pieterse; M C M Baas-Thijssen; C A M Marijnen; A M Stiggelbout
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  31 in total

1.  Communication about geriatric assessment domains in advanced cancer settings: "Missed opportunities".

Authors:  Lisa M Lowenstein; Robert J Volk; Richard Street; Marie Flannery; Allison Magnuson; Ronald Epstein; Supriya G Mohile
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 3.599

2.  Validation of SDM-Q-Doc Questionnaire to measure shared decision-making physician's perspective in oncology practice.

Authors:  C Calderon; P J Ferrando; A Carmona-Bayonas; U Lorenzo-Seva; C Jara; C Beato; T García; A Ramchandani; B Castelo; M M Muñoz; S Garcia; O Higuera; M Mangas-Izquierdo; P Jimenez-Fonseca
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Patient, Physician and Contextual Factors Are Influential in the Treatment Decision Making of Older Adults Newly Diagnosed with Symptomatic Myeloma.

Authors:  Joseph D Tariman; Ardith Doorenbos; Karen G Schepp; Pamela S Becker; Donna L Berry
Journal:  Cancer Treat Commun       Date:  2014

4.  Was a decision made? An assessment of patient-clinician discordance in medical oncology encounters.

Authors:  Aaron L Leppin; Katherine M Humeniuk; Cara Fernandez; Victor M Montori; Kathleen Yost; Ashok Kumbamu; Gail Geller; Jon C Tilburt
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Characterizing Time to Diagnostic Resolution After an Abnormal Cancer Screening Exam in Older Adult Participants in the Ohio Patient Navigation Research Program.

Authors:  Jennifer M DeSalvo; Gregory S Young; Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Aging Health       Date:  2017-06-25

6.  Opportunities for theory-informed decision science in cancer control.

Authors:  Arielle S Gillman; Rebecca A Ferrer
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  How acceptable is paternalism? A survey-based study of clinician and nonclinician opinions on paternalistic decision making.

Authors:  Kunal Bailoor; Thomas Valley; Chithra Perumalswami; Andrew G Shuman; Raymond DeVries; Darin B Zahuranec
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2018-05-03

Review 8.  Toxicity of Cancer Therapies in Older Patients.

Authors:  Olivia Le Saux; Claire Falandry
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 5.075

9.  Expected survival with and without second-line palliative chemotherapy: who wants to know?

Authors:  Linda J M Oostendorp; Petronella B Ottevanger; Agnes J van de Wouw; Ivonne J H Schoenaker; Hiltje de Graaf; Winette T A van der Graaf; Peep F M Stalmeier
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Decision Aid Implementation and Patients' Preferences for Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment: Insights from the High Value Healthcare Collaborative.

Authors:  Vanessa B Hurley; Yue Wang; Hector P Rodriguez; Stephen M Shortell; Stephen Kearing; Lucy A Savitz
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2020-01-06       Impact factor: 2.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.