Literature DB >> 2754680

Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions.

H J Sutherland1, H A Llewellyn-Thomas, G A Lockwood, D L Tritchler, J E Till.   

Abstract

The relationship between cancer patients' desire for information and their preference for participation in decision making has been examined. Approximately 77% of the 52 patients reported that they had participated in decision making to the extent that they wished, while most of the remaining 23% would have preferred an opportunity to have greater input. Although many of the patients actively sought information, a majority preferred the physician to assume the role of the primary decision maker. Ethically, the disclosure of information has been assumed to be necessary for autonomous decision making. Nevertheless, the results of this study indicate that patients may actively seek information to satisfy an as yet unidentified aspect of psychological autonomy that does not necessarily include participation in decision making.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2754680      PMCID: PMC1292127          DOI: 10.1177/014107688908200506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Med        ISSN: 0141-0768            Impact factor:   18.000


  9 in total

1.  Clinical reasoning and cognitive processes.

Authors:  J C Hershey; J Baron
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1987 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  Autonomy, beneficence, and informed consent: rethinking the connections. I.

Authors:  D Shatz
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.176

3.  Autonomy revisited: progress in medical ethics: discussion paper.

Authors:  H Brody
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Autonomy in the doctor-patient relation.

Authors:  D C Thomasma
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1984-02

5.  Assessment of Preferences for self-treatment and information in health care.

Authors:  D S Krantz; A Baum; M v Wideman
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1980-11

6.  Do patients want to participate in medical decision making?

Authors:  W M Strull; B Lo; G Charles
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-12-07       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Information and participation preferences among cancer patients.

Authors:  B R Cassileth; R V Zupkis; K Sutton-Smith; V March
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Patients' rights in decision making: the case for personalism versus paternalism in health care.

Authors:  W S Schain
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1980-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Informed consent: a medical viewpoint.

Authors:  J S Simpson
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1981-02-21       Impact factor: 7.738

  9 in total
  76 in total

1.  A role for the sick role. Patient preferences regarding information and participation in clinical decision-making.

Authors:  A M Stiggelbout; G M Kiebert
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Relationships among Internet health information use, patient behavior and self efficacy in newly diagnosed cancer patients who contact the National Cancer Institute's NCI Atlantic Region Cancer Information Service (CIS).

Authors:  Linda Fleisher; Sarah Bass; Sheryl Burt Ruzek; Nancy McKeown-Conn
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2002

3.  Intentional and unintentional nonadherence: a study of decision making.

Authors:  Abigail L Wroe
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2002-08

4.  Studying patients' preferences in health care decision making. Health Services Research Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1992-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Factors in client-clinician interaction that influence hearing aid adoption.

Authors:  Laya Poost-Foroosh; Mary Beth Jennings; Lynn Shaw; Christine N Meston; Margaret F Cheesman
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-12-07

Review 6.  Management of primary breast cancer.

Authors:  A Melville; A Liberati; R Grilli; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1996-12

7.  Therapeutic ratio and defined phases: proposal of ethical framework for palliative care.

Authors:  M Ashby; B Stoffell
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-06-01

8.  Citation analysis of Canadian psycho-oncology and supportive care researchers.

Authors:  Thomas F Hack; Dauna Crooks; James Plohman; Emma Kepron
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Characteristics Associated With Preferences for Parent-Centered Decision Making in Neonatal Intensive Care.

Authors:  Elliott Mark Weiss; Dawei Xie; Noah Cook; Katherine Coughlin; Steven Joffe
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 16.193

10.  Random allocation or allocation at random? Patients' perspectives of participation in a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  K Featherstone; J L Donovan
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.