Literature DB >> 8234311

Model observers for assessment of image quality.

H H Barrett1, J Yao, J P Rolland, K J Myers.   

Abstract

Image quality can be defined objectively in terms of the performance of some "observer" (either a human or a mathematical model) for some task of practical interest. If the end user of the image will be a human, model observers are used to predict the task performance of the human, as measured by psychophysical studies, and hence to serve as the basis for optimization of image quality. In this paper, we consider the task of detection of a weak signal in a noisy image. The mathematical observers considered include the ideal Bayesian, the nonprewhitening matched filter, a model based on linear-discriminant analysis and referred to as the Hotelling observer, and the Hotelling and Bayesian observers modified to account for the spatial-frequency-selective channels in the human visual system. The theory behind these observer models is briefly reviewed, and several psychophysical studies relating to the choice among them are summarized. Only the Hotelling model with channels is mathematically tractable in all cases considered here and capable of accounting for all of these data. This model requires no adjustment of parameters to fit the data and is relatively insensitive to the details of the channel mechanism. We therefore suggest it as a useful model observer for the purpose of assessing and optimizing image quality with respect to simple detection tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8234311      PMCID: PMC47653          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.21.9758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  16 in total

1.  A method of determining the over-all quantum efficiency of visual discriminations.

Authors:  H B BARLOW
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Objective assessment of image quality: effects of quantum noise and object variability.

Authors:  H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 3.  ROC methodology in radiologic imaging.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 6.016

4.  Addition of a channel mechanism to the ideal-observer model.

Authors:  K J Myers; H H Barrett
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Spatial-frequency channels in human vision.

Authors:  M B Sachs; J Nachmias; J G Robson
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1971-09

6.  Display thresholding of images and observer detection performance.

Authors:  P F Judy; R G Swensson
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 7.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems.

Authors:  J A Swets
Journal:  Science       Date:  1988-06-03       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 3. Effect of pixel size on SNR and threshold contrast.

Authors:  M L Giger; K Doi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1985 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Effect of noise correlation on detectability of disk signals in medical imaging.

Authors:  K J Myers; H H Barrett; M C Borgstrom; D D Patton; G W Seeley
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  Hotelling trace criterion and its correlation with human-observer performance.

Authors:  R D Fiete; H H Barrett; W E Smith; K J Myers
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 2.129

View more
  111 in total

1.  Achieving routine submillisievert CT scanning: report from the summit on management of radiation dose in CT.

Authors:  Cynthia H McCollough; Guang Hong Chen; Willi Kalender; Shuai Leng; Ehsan Samei; Katsuyuki Taguchi; Ge Wang; Lifeng Yu; Roderic I Pettigrew
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Beyond noise power in 3D computed tomography: the local NPS and off-diagonal elements of the Fourier domain covariance matrix.

Authors:  Angel R Pineda; Daniel J Tward; Antonio Gonzalez; Jeffrey H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Rapid Computation of LROC Figures of Merit Using Numerical Observers (for SPECT/PET Reconstruction).

Authors:  Parmeshwar Khurd; Gene Gindi
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.679

4.  Myocardial perfusion SPECT using a rotating multi-segment slant-hole collimator.

Authors:  Chi Liu; Jingyan Xu; Benjamin M W Tsui
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Computational and human observer image quality evaluation of low dose, knowledge-based CT iterative reconstruction.

Authors:  Brendan L Eck; Rachid Fahmi; Kevin M Brown; Stanislav Zabic; Nilgoun Raihani; Jun Miao; David L Wilson
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Review of SPECT collimator selection, optimization, and fabrication for clinical and preclinical imaging.

Authors:  Karen Van Audenhaege; Roel Van Holen; Stefaan Vandenberghe; Christian Vanhove; Scott D Metzler; Stephen C Moore
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Factors affecting the normality of channel outputs of channelized model observers: an investigation using realistic myocardial perfusion SPECT images.

Authors:  Fatma E A Elshahaby; Michael Ghaly; Abhinav K Jha; Eric C Frey
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2016-01-28

8.  Data analysis in emission tomography using emission-count posteriors.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Sitek
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  An alternate method for using a visual discrimination model (VDM) to optimize soft-copy display image quality.

Authors:  Dev P Chakraborty
Journal:  J Soc Inf Disp       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.140

10.  New Theoretical Results on Channelized Hotelling Observer Performance Estimation with Known Difference of Class Means.

Authors:  Adam Wunderlich; Frédéric Noo
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 1.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.