Literature DB >> 17710120

An alternate method for using a visual discrimination model (VDM) to optimize soft-copy display image quality.

Dev P Chakraborty1.   

Abstract

Researchers have developed visual discrimination models (VDMs) that can predict a human observer's ability to detect a target object superposed on an image. These models incorporate sophisticated knowledge of the properties of the human visual system. In the predictive approach, termed conventional VDM usage, two input images with and without a target are analyzed by an algorithm that calculates a just-noticeable-difference (JND) index, which is a taken as a measure of the detectability of the target. A new method of using the VDM is described, termed channelized VDM, which involves finding the linear combination of the VDM-generated channels (which are not used in conventional VDM analysis) that has optimal classification ability between normal and abnormal images. The classification ability can be measured using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) or two alternative forced choice (2AFC) experiments, and in special cases they can also be predicted by signal detection theory (SDT) based model-observer methods. In this study simulated background and nodule containing regions were used to validate the new method. It was found that the channelized VDM predictions were in excellent qualitative agreement with human-observer validated SDT predictions. Either VDM method (conventional or channelized) has potential applicability to soft-copy display optimization. An advantage of any VDM-based approach is that complex effects, such as visual masking, are automatically accounted for, which effects are usually not included in SDT-based methods.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 17710120      PMCID: PMC1945234          DOI: 10.1889/1.2372426

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Soc Inf Disp        ISSN: 1071-0922            Impact factor:   2.140


  14 in total

1.  Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs.

Authors:  E Samei; M J Flynn; W R Eyler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of display phosphor.

Authors:  Elizabeth Krupinski; Jeffrey Johnson; Hans Roehrig; Jeffrey Lubin
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  On the noise variance of a digital mammography system.

Authors:  Arthur Burgess
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The effect of the antiscatter grid on full-field digital mammography phantom images.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Simulation of subtle lung nodules in projection chest radiography.

Authors:  E Samei; M J Flynn; W R Eyler
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Computer analysis of mammography phantom images (CAMPI): an application to the measurement of microcalcification image quality of directly acquired digital images.

Authors:  D P Chakraborty
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 7.  ROC methodology in radiologic imaging.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 6.016

8.  SNR and noise measurements for medical imaging: I. A practical approach based on statistical decision theory.

Authors:  M J Tapiovaara; R F Wagner
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise.

Authors:  A E Burgess; F L Jacobson; P F Judy
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.071

10.  Comparison of receiver operating characteristic and forced choice observer performance measurement methods.

Authors:  A E Burgess
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.071

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.