Literature DB >> 4000077

Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 3. Effect of pixel size on SNR and threshold contrast.

M L Giger, K Doi.   

Abstract

The effect of pixel size on the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and threshold detection of low-contrast radiologic patterns was investigated theoretically for digital radiographic systems. The SNR based on the perceived statistical decision theory model, together with the internal noise of the human eye-brain system, was calculated by using two-dimensional displayed digital signal spectra and noise Wiener spectra. Threshold contrasts were predicted from the calculated SNR for various combinations of object size and shape, pixel size, resolution, and noise. Predicted threshold contrasts agreed well with those determined experimentally in an observer performance study. The threshold contrast of small objects increased substantially as the pixel size increased beyond 0.2 mm. For pixel sizes of 0.1 and 0.2 mm, however, the threshold contrasts were similar. Since a digital system is not shift invariant, a range of threshold contrast results for a small object and a large pixel, depending on the alignment of the object position relative to the sampling coordinates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4000077     DOI: 10.1118/1.595708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  6 in total

1.  Two K versus 4 K storage phosphor chest radiography: detection performance and image quality.

Authors:  Claus Koelblinger; Mathias Prokop; Michael Weber; Johannes Sailer; Fabiola Cartes-Zumelzu; Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential.

Authors:  Kunio Doi
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 3.  Anniversary paper: History and status of CAD and quantitative image analysis: the role of Medical Physics and AAPM.

Authors:  Maryellen L Giger; Heang-Ping Chan; John Boone
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Model observers for assessment of image quality.

Authors:  H H Barrett; J Yao; J P Rolland; K J Myers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-11-01       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evaluation of Non-Uniform Image Quality Caused by Anode Heel Effect in Digital Radiography Using Mutual Information.

Authors:  Ming-Chung Chou
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-25       Impact factor: 2.524

Review 6.  An engineering view on megatrends in radiology: digitization to quantitative tools of medicine.

Authors:  Namkug Kim; Jaesoon Choi; Jaeyoun Yi; Seungwook Choi; Seyoun Park; Yongjun Chang; Joon Beom Seo
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2013-02-22       Impact factor: 3.500

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.