| Literature DB >> 36230139 |
Yun Lu1,2, Shuqi Xing1,3, Laping He1,3, Cuiqin Li1,3,4, Xiao Wang1,3, Xuefeng Zeng1,3, Yifeng Dai1,3.
Abstract
Lactobacilli have been widely concerned for decades. Bacteria of the genus Lactobacillus have been commonly employed in fermented food to improve the appearance, smell, and taste of food or prolong its shelf-life. They comprise 261 species (by March 2020) that are highly diverse at the phenotypic, ecological, and genotypic levels. Some Lactobacilli strains have been documented to be essential probiotics, which are defined as a group of living microorganisms that are beneficial to the health of the host when ingested in sufficiency. However, the characterization, high-density fermentation, and the production of a directed vat set (DVS) starter of Lactobacilli strains used in the food industry have not been systematically reported. This paper mainly focuses on reviewing Lactobacilli as functional starter cultures in the food industry, including different molecular techniques for identification at the species and strain levels, methods for evaluating Lactobacilli properties, enhancing their performance and improving the cell density of Lactobacilli, and the production techniques of DVS starter of Lactobacilli strains. Moreover, this review further discussed the existing problems and future development prospects of Lactobacilli in the food industry. The viability and stability of Lactobacilli in the food industry and gastrointestinal environment are critical challenges at the industrial scale. The new production equipment and technology of DVS starter of Lactobacilli strains will have the potential for large-scale application, for example, developing low-temperature spray drying, freezing granulation drying, and spray freeze-drying.Entities:
Keywords: Lactobacilli strains; characterization; performance improvement; probiotics; production of DVS starter
Year: 2022 PMID: 36230139 PMCID: PMC9563398 DOI: 10.3390/foods11193063
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Lactobacilli species in fermented foods.
| Fermented Products | References | |
|---|---|---|
| Fermented fish products | [ | |
| Fermented dairy products | [ | |
| Fermented soy products | [ | |
| Fermented starch foods | [ | |
| Fermented fruit and vegetable | [ | |
| Fermented meat products | [ |
Figure 1Neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences showing the relationship between known species in Lactobacillus, produced and rendered by an online tool—Interactive Tree of Life (https://itol.embl.de/, accessed on 21 March 2022) [43]. The lilac background color represents Lactobacillus species commonly used in the food industry (including fermented fish products, fermented dairy products, fermented soy products, fermented starch foods, fermented fruit and vegetable, fermented meat products, etc.), and the pink background color represents others (including human gastrointestinal tract, vagina, oral cavity, etc.).
Characteristics of Lactobacilli strains.
| Characteristic | Assays | Representative References |
|---|---|---|
| Safety | Strain identification (including physiological and biochemical tests, molecular level) | [ |
| Antibiotic resistance | [ | |
| Hemolytic activity | [ | |
| Determination of potential metabolites (enzyme production, toxin production, production of biogenic amines) | [ | |
| Tolerance to stress | Low pH and bile (for example, artificial gastric and pancreatic juices and GIT simulators) | [ |
| Growth environment (for example, nutrition substrate, osmotic pressure, light, temperature, oxygen) | [ | |
| Adhesion ability | Cell surface hydrophobicity | [ |
| Adhesion to mucus (for example, adhesion to mucin) | [ | |
| Adhesion to Caco-2/TC7 cells | [ | |
| Antimicrobial activity | Production of antimicrobial metabolites such as lactic acid and bacteriocin against pathogenic bacteria (e.g., streak methods, disk diffusion methods, turbidimetric assays, biofluorescence analysis) | [ |
| Autoaggregation, Coaggregation | [ | |
| Technological properties | Proteolytic activity (e.g., production of various proteases) | [ |
| Lipolytic activity (e.g., production of lipases) | [ | |
| Carbohydrate degradation activity (e.g., production of various glycosidases, amylases, cellulases) | [ | |
| Reduce cardiovascular disease | Cholesterol degradation tests (e.g., Bile salt hydrolase activity) | [ |
| Metabolites such as peptides inhibit the ACE activity | [ | |
| Antioxidant | Tolerance to hydrogen peroxide | [ |
| Metabolites such as the antioxidant activity of extracellular polysaccharides, peptides | [ | |
| Anticancer | Ames test | [ |
| Comet assay | [ | |
| Nitrosamine degradation assay | [ | |
| Inducing apoptosis of cancer cells test | [ | |
| Additional characteristics | Conjugated linoleic acid test | [ |
| The removal of heavy metals | [ | |
| β-Galactosidase activity analysis | [ | |
| Determination of oxalic acid degradation | [ | |
| Determination of production of short-chain unsaturated fatty acids and vitamins | [ |
Figure 2Characterization and evaluation procedures of Lactobacilli strains.
Molecular approaches used in discrimination among the genus Lactobacillus.
| Methods Used | Comments | Species Identified and Source | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23S rDNA probe | Probes unequivocally differentiated | [ | |
| Ribotyping | Good discrimination at strains level based upon differences in rRNA. | Some | [ |
| RAPD | Good discrimination at strains level. | [ | |
| Species-specific PCR (plantaricin biosynthesis protein gene) | Rapid and preliminary screening of | [ | |
| Species-specific PCR using 16S rRNA or unique genes primers | Successful in the species detected in 17 products matched those indicated on their labels, whereas the remaining products contained species other than those appearing on the label. | Some | [ |
| Genus- and species-specific PCR, multiplex PCR, | Multiplex PCR and MALDI-TOF MS were the most valuable methods to identify the tested bacteria at the species level. At the strain level, the AFLP-PCR method showed the highest discriminatory power. | [ | |
| Comparative sequence analysis, stretches of | Successful in a clear separation of all type strains in distinct branches; identification of | [ | |
| 16S ARDRA, RAPD, Eco RI ribotyping | 13 wine strains typed as | [ | |
| PFGE | Good discrimination at strain level based upon different bacterial strains. | The strains of | [ |
| One-step PCR-based, using 16S rRNA genes primers | Successful differentiation among 10 common lactic acid bacteria at the species level. | [ | |
| 16S ARDRA, ribotyping, RAPD | Only RAPD and ribotyping could discriminate between the type strains of both species. | [ | |
| PCR-ARDRA (Taq I), RAPD | ARDRA and RAPD approaches may demonstrate a robust efficiency in the discrimination of unknown isolates. | [ | |
| Repetitive-element PCR | Could rapidly and easily differentiate | The closely related strains of | [ |
| Multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) and multiplex RAPD-PCR | Targeting different genetic variations under the combination of MLST and multiplex-RAPD analysis | [ | |
| PCR-DGGE, length-heterogeneity PCR (LH-PCR) | Good discrimination at strains level. | Type and reference strains of | [ |
| FISH | Rapid and accurate way to identify and quantify bacterial species. | [ |
Figure 3Probiotic properties of Lactobacillus spp.
Some crucial functions of Lactobacilli strains.
| Functional Properties | Example | Reference |
|---|---|---|
| Regulating immune system | Jang et al. evaluated immunometabolic functions of | [ |
| Regulating the balance of blood glucose, blood lipid, and blood pressure | Li et al. found that | [ |
| Antimicrobial activity | Lim et al. found that | [ |
| Lower blood pressure | Ong et al. found that | [ |
| Antitumor | Rajoka et al. found that the antiproliferative activity of the fermentation supernatant of | [ |
| Antioxidant | Suo et al. found that | [ |
The current high-density-culture methods showing advantages and disadvantages.
| Current High-Density-Culture Methods | Advantage | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Buffer salt culture [ | Add a buffer salt that has no effect on the strain or has a growth-promoting impact on the culture medium to improve the buffering capacity of the fermentation broth and control the stability of pH within a specific range, easy to operate. | The buffering capacity of the buffer salt is limited and can only play a role within a specific range. |
| Chemical neutralization culture [ | Add lye (such as NaOH, ammonia, and CaCO3) to the culture system to control the pH value of the fermentation system, easy to operate. | With the continuous addition of lye and the accumulation of metabolites, too high salt concentration will inhibit the growth of bacteria. |
| Dialysis culture [ | Remove part of the small molecular metabolites produced by the bacteria while providing fresh nutrients to the culture solution. | A small processing volume, a long dialysis process, and large equipment investment are also not conducive to industrialization. |
| Fed-batch culture (non-feedback mode and feedback mode) [ | Effectively eliminates substrate inhibition and acid inhibition and is simple to operate | Inadequate utilization of nutrients; Limited by container volume |
| Cross-flow culture [ | Due to cross-flow filtration, the high viscosity produced by cells is reduced, which is conducive to cell recovery and high concentration | High equipment cost; Requires more professional operators; It is easy to block the membrane module. |
| Circulating culture (sedimentation, centrifugation, and membrane filtration) [ | Through technologies such as sedimentation, centrifugation, and membrane filtration, the cells are intercepted, the culture medium flows out, and then a certain amount of fresh culture medium is added to obtain high-density cells. It shortens the production time and saves a lot of power, workforce, water, and steam | In the circulation process, the strains quickly degenerate and are polluted, resulting in economic losses; The utilization rate of nutrients was lower than that of batch culture. |
Figure 4Production process of DVS starters.