| Literature DB >> 29643848 |
Barbara Guantario1, Paola Zinno1, Emily Schifano2, Marianna Roselli1, Giuditta Perozzi1, Claudio Palleschi2, Daniela Uccelletti2, Chiara Devirgiliis1.
Abstract
Table olives are increasingly recognized as a vehicle as well as a source of probiotic bacteria, especially those fermented with traditional procedures based on the activity of indigenous microbial consortia, originating from local environments. In the present study, we report characterization at the species level of 49 Lactic Acid Bacteria (LAB) strains deriving from Nocellara del Belice table olives fermented with the Spanish or Castelvetrano methods, recently isolated in our previous work. Ribosomal 16S DNA analysis allowed identification of 4 Enterococcus gallinarum, 3 E. casseliflavus, 14 Leuconostoc mesenteroides, 19 Lactobacillus pentosus, 7 L. coryniformis, and 2 L. oligofermentans. The L. pentosus and L. coryniformis strains were subjected to further screening to evaluate their probiotic potential, using a combination of in vitro and in vivo approaches. The majority of them showed high survival rates under in vitro simulated gastro-intestinal conditions, and positive antimicrobial activity against Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium, Listeria monocytogenes and enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) pathogens. Evaluation of antibiotic resistance to ampicillin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, or erythromycin was also performed for all selected strains. Three L. coryniformis strains were selected as very good performers in the initial in vitro testing screens, they were antibiotic susceptible, as well as capable of inhibiting pathogen growth in vitro. Parallel screening employing the simplified model organism Caenorhabditis elegans, fed the Lactobacillus strains as a food source, revealed that one L. pentosus and one L. coryniformis strains significantly induced prolongevity effects and protection from pathogen-mediated infection. Moreover, both strains displayed adhesion to human intestinal epithelial Caco-2 cells and were able to outcompete foodborne pathogens for cell adhesion. Overall, these results are suggestive of beneficial features for novel LAB strains, which renders them promising candidates as starters for the manufacturing of fermented table olives with probiotic added value.Entities:
Keywords: autochtonous bacteria; fermented foods; foodborne bacteria; nematode; plant food matrix
Year: 2018 PMID: 29643848 PMCID: PMC5882814 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00595
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
List of LAB isolates deriving from Nocellara del Belice table olives fermented with Sivigliano or Castelvetrano methods and related species identified by 16S rDNA sequencing.
| C303.8 | 99 | Castelvetrano | ||
| C301.1 | 99 | Castelvetrano | ||
| C302.1 | 99 | Castelvetrano | ||
| C302.4 | 99 | Castelvetrano | ||
| C303.6 | 99 | Castelvetrano | ||
| C304.2 | 99 | Castelvetrano | ||
| I307.27 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| G307.7 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| G3010.28 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| G3010.29 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| H306.1 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| I307.20 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| I307.22 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| I307.29 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| I306.9 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| I3010.34 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| L309.4 | 98 | Sivigliano | ||
| C305.2 | 99 | Castelvetrano | ||
| C305.16 | 99 | Castelvetrano | ||
| C305.5 | 99 | Castelvetrano | ||
| D301.4 | 99 | Castelvetrano | ||
| D302.23 | 98 | Castelvetrano | ||
| D302.29 | 99 | Castelvetrano | ||
| G306.1 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| G306.2 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| G308.65 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| H3010.5 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| I306.2 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| H308.2 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| I308.32 | 100 | Sivigliano | ||
| D303.36 | 99 | Castelvetrano | ||
| H3010.1 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| I306.12 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| H307.1 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| C305.1 | 99 | Castelvetrano | ||
| H307.6 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| C303.1 | 99 | Castelvetrano | ||
| G3010.31 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| C371.10 | 97 | Castelvetrano | ||
| C373.1 | 98 | Castelvetrano | ||
| D371.5 | 99 | Castelvetrano | ||
| D372.20 | 99 | Castelvetrano | ||
| D373.37 | 99 | Castelvetrano | ||
| I379.8 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| G377.8 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| G378.30 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| H376.2 | 98 | Sivigliano | ||
| H376.5 | 99 | Sivigliano | ||
| H377.3 | 99 | Sivigliano |
Figure 1Strain typing of the selected L. pentosus and L. coryniformis isolates by rep-PCR. Agarose gel electrophoresis of GTG5 rep-PCR fingerprinting profiles of L. coryniformis and L. pentosus strains. M: 1 kb DNA ladder (Microzone, UK).
Survival of L. pentosus and L. coryniformis strains under in vitro simulated gastro-intestinal conditions.
| C305.5 | 8.20 ± 0.02a | 7.53 ± 0.03b | 6.18 ± 0.02c | 6.14 ± 0.03c | 74.92 | |
| D301.4 | 9.12 ± 0.08a | 7.75 ± 0.15b | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| D302.23 | 8.93 ± 0.03a | 8.40 ± 0.07b | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| D302.29 | 9.23 ± 0.003a | 8.70 ± 0.05b | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| G306.1 | 8.31 ± 0.18a | 7.77 ± 0.05b | 5.97 ± 0.07c | 5.94 ± 0.07c | 71.44 | |
| G306.2 | 8.91 ± 0.12a | 8.43 ± 0.02b | 6.99 ± 0.02c | 6.91 ± 0.05c | 77.60 | |
| G308.65 | 9.09 ± 0.06a | 8.30 ± 0.02b | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| H3010.5 | 9.49 ± 0.09a | 8.48 ± 0.05b | 6.20 ± 0.12c | 4.72 ± 0.15d | 49.76 | |
| I306.2 | 8.61 ± 0.13a | 8.07 ± 0.09b | 6.69 ± 0.03c | 6.50 ± 0.10c | 75.47 | |
| H308.2 | 8.63 ± 0.24a | 8.10 ± 0.05b | 6.66 ± 0.04c | 5.99 ± 0.10d | 69.43 | |
| I308.32 | 9.19 ± 0.01a | 8.06 ± 0.02b | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| G377.8 | 9.38 ± 0.32a | 8.23 ± 0.01b | 6.77 ± 0.02c | 6.44 ± 0.07c | 68.64 | |
| G378.30 | 9.17 ± 0.19a | 8.08 ± 0.07b | 5.52 ± 0.30c | 0 | 0 | |
| D303.36 | 9.05 ± 0.14a | 8.54 ± 0.03b | 5.21 ± 0.07c | 4.68 ± 0.04d | 51.65 | |
| H3010.1 | 8.92 ± 0.21a | 6.81 ± 0.35b | 5.01 ± 0.06c | 4.74 ± 0.15c | 53.17 | |
| D371.5 | 8.66 ± 0.04a | 7.84 ± 0.04b | 5.62 ± 0.51c | 5.32 ± 0.05c | 61.43 | |
| D372.20 | 9.10 ± 0.06a | 7.85 ± 0.03b | 5.99 ± 0.03c | 4.56 ± 0.33d | 50.09 | |
| D373.37 | 8.53 ± 0.05a | 7.57 ± 0.09b | 6.27 ± 0.2c | 6.23 ± 0.02c | 72.99 | |
| I379.8 | 8.95 ± 0.04a | 8.25 ± 0.03b | 7.02 ± 0.04c | 6.88 ± 0.02d | 76.88 | |
| I306.12 | 8.71 ± 0.093a | 8.56 ± 0.12a | 6.80 ± 0.25b | 6.71 ± 0.03b | 77.04 | |
| H307.1 | 8.80 ± 0.09a | 8.09 ± 0.13b | 6.13 ± 0.06c | 6.18 ± 0.04c | 70.20 | |
| C305.1 | 8.25 ± 0.01 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| H307.6 | 9.66 ± 0.24a | 8.54 ± 0.04b | 7.80 ± 0.05c | 7.09 ± 0.10d | 73.44 | |
| H376.2 | 8.55 ± 0.05 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| H376.5 | 8.35 ± 0.01a | 7.54 ± 0.14b | 5.55 ± 0.41c | 5.49 ± 0.15c | 65.82 | |
| H377.3 | 8.76 ± 0.06a | 8.21 ± 0.04b | 6.98 ± 0.04c | 6.96 ± 0.01c | 79.49 | |
| GG | 8.7 ± 0.021a | 8.1 ± 0.39b | 6.9 ± 0.04c | 6.1 ± 0.04d | 69.91 |
Values represent mean log (CFU/ml) ± standard deviation. Distinct letters indicate significance at p value < 0.05 among log (CFU/ml) values for the different tested conditions, within each strain.
Survival capacity is expressed as the percentage of 1– [(log CFU/ml.
Antibiotic resistance of L. pentosus and L. coryniformis strains.
| C305.5 | S | S | S | S | |
| D301.4 | R (20) | S | S | S | |
| D302.23 | R (20) | S | S | S | |
| D302.29 | R (2) | S | S | S | |
| G306.1 | R (8) | S | S | S | |
| G306.2 | R (4) | S | S | S | |
| G308.65 | R (16) | S | S | S | |
| H3010.5 | R (4) | S | S | S | |
| I306.2 | R (8) | S | S | S | |
| H308.2 | R (12) | S | S | S | |
| I308.32 | R (8) | S | S | S | |
| G377.8 | R (4) | S | S | S | |
| G378.30 | R (8) | S | S | S | |
| D303.36 | R (16) | S | S | R (2.5) | |
| H3010.1 | R (4) | S | S | R (1.25) | |
| D371.5 | R (4) | S | S | S | |
| D372.20 | R (8) | S | S | S | |
| D373.37 | R (8) | S | S | S | |
| I379.8 | R (4) | S | S | R (2.5) | |
| I306.12 | S | S | S | S | |
| H307.1 | S | S | S | S | |
| C305.1 | S | S | S | S | |
| H307.6 | S | S | S | S | |
| H376.2 | S | S | S | S | |
| H376.5 | S | S | S | S | |
| H377.3 | S | S | S | S | |
Each antibiotic was used at the microbiological breakpoint indicated in parenthesis, according to the bacterial species.
LAB strains resulting sensitive or resistant to antibiotic are referred as S or R, respectively.
MIC values (expressed as mg/l) for resistant strains are indicated in parenthesis.
Antimicrobial activity of L. pentosus and L. coryniformis strains against indicator pathogens.
| C305.5 | − | + | + | |
| D301.4 | ++ | + | ++ | |
| D302.23 | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| D302.29 | ++ | + | + | |
| G306.1 | ++ | + | + | |
| G306.2 | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| G308.65 | ++ | + | + | |
| H3010.5 | + | ++ | ++ | |
| I306.2 | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| H308.2 | ++ | + | ++ | |
| I308.32 | ++ | ++ | + | |
| G377.8 | + | ++ | ++ | |
| G378.30 | + | ++ | ++ | |
| D303.36 | ++ | + | + | |
| H3010.1 | ++ | ++ | ++ | |
| D371.5 | + | ++ | ++ | |
| D372.20 | + | ++ | ++ | |
| D373.37 | + | + | ++ | |
| I379.8 | + | ++ | ++ | |
| I306.12 | + | + | + | |
| H307.1 | ++ | + | ++ | |
| C305.1 | + | + | + | |
| H307.6 | + | + | + | |
| H376.2 | + | + | + | |
| H376.5 | + | + | + | |
| H377.3 | ++ | + | ++ | |
Inhibitory activities refer to the measured inhibition halo diameter and are indicated as: – (diameter <1 mm);
+ (1 mm < diameter < median value); ++ (diameter > median value).
Figure 2Effect of the L. pentosus D303.36 and L. coryniformis H307.6 strains on C. elegans lifespan, body length, and fertility. (A) Kaplan–Mèier survival plots of N2 fed L. p. D303.36 and L. c. H307.6 strains, starting from embryo hatching; n = 60 for each single experiment. Lifespans of OP50- and LGG-fed animals are reported as controls. (B) Survival of C. elegans fed heat killed bacterial strains. Statistical analysis was evaluated by one-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni post-test; asterisks indicate significant differences (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001). (C) Effect of bacteria on larval development. Worm length was measured from head to tail at the indicated time points. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni post-test; different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05). (D) Embryo production per worm in animals fed different bacterial strains. Bars represent the mean of three independent experiments (**p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001).
Figure 3Analysis of aging markers in C. elegans fed the L. pentosus D303.36 and L. coryniformis H307.6 strains. (A) Pumping rate of 13-days-old worms, measured for 30 s and determined from the mean of 10 worms for each bacterial strain. Worms fed OP50 or LGG were used as controls. (B) Body bend frequency, measured for 30 s, of C. elegans fed different Lactobacillus strains or OP50. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni post-test; asterisks indicate significant differences (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01). (C) Autofluorescence of lipofuscin granules in C. elegans fed different bacterial strains on day 13. Ten worms were used for each measurement. Scale bar = 100μm.
Figure 4Rescuing potential of L. pentosus D303.36 and L. coryniformis H307.6 against Salmonella enterica infection. Kaplan–Mèier Survival plot of C. elegans fed L. pentosus D303.36 or L. coryniformis H307.6 in a 1:1 co-colture with S. enterica serovar Thyphimurium LT2. Worms fed Salmonella alone were taken as control (**p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001).
Figure 5Reduction of Salmonella enterica adhesion to Caco-2 cells by L. pentosus D303.36 and L. coryniformis H307.6. Cell counts of viable S. enterica serovar Thyphimurium LT2 adhering on differentiated Caco-2 cells treated with: S. enterica alone (control, white column); S. enterica in combination with L. pentosus D303.36 (black column) or L. coryniformis H307.6 (gray column). Columns represent the mean ± SD of four independent experiments. Data are reported as log of bacterial CFU recovered after plating. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA, followed by post-hoc Tukey honestly significant difference (HSD) test. Asterisks indicate significant differences (*p < 0.05 vs. control).
Summary table listing the main features displayed by the candidate probiotic strains identified in this study.
| − | ND | 70.20 | +++ | ND | ND | S | NA | |
| − | ND | 79.49 | +++ | ND | ND | S | NA | |
| + | + | 73.44 | + | +( | +( | S | NA | |
| ++ | + | 51.65 | ++ | +( | +( | R(Amp, Ery) | Amp = 16Ery = 2.5 | |
growth in the presence of breakpoint concentration of antibiotics; R, Resistant to the specified antibiotics; S, Susceptible to all tested antibiotics.
MIC, Minimum Inhibitory Concentration, determined only for strains which survived breakpoint concentrations for the specified antibiotics.
ND, Not Determined; NA, Not Applicable.