| Literature DB >> 36077571 |
Tian Min1, Delight Hwarari1, Dong'ao Li2, Ali Movahedi1, Liming Yang1.
Abstract
CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing technology provides straightforward, proficient, and multifunctional ways for the site-directed modification of organism genomes and genes. The application of CRISPR-based technology in plants has a vast potential value in gene function research, germplasm innovation, and genetic improvement. The complexity of woody plants genome may pose significant challenges in the application and expansion of various new editing techniques, such as Cas9, 12, 13, and 14 effectors, base editing, particularly for timberland species with a long life span, huge genome, and ploidy. Therefore, many novel optimisms have been drawn to molecular breeding research based on woody plants. This review summarizes the recent development of CRISPR/Cas applications for essential traits, including wood properties, flowering, biological stress, abiotic stress, growth, and development in woody plants. We outlined the current problems and future development trends of this technology in germplasm and the improvement of products in woody plants.Entities:
Keywords: CRISPR/Cas; gene editing; precision breeding; trait improvement; woody plants
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36077571 PMCID: PMC9456532 DOI: 10.3390/ijms231710175
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1Representative schematic diagrams of CRISPR/Cas editing. (A) Cas9 applies the PAM and sgRNA to cleave the target DNA and produce a DBS, which is repaired by NHEJ or HDR; (B) Cas12a uses a RuvC domain under the guidance of crRNA without the participation of tracrRNA to cleave dsDNA, producing a sticky end; (C) Cas13a targets RNA in the nucleus; (D) CRISPR/Cas14a targets ssDNA cleavage under the direction of sgRNA, and does not require a PAM sequence, producing SSB; (E) CBE system compliments the single base replacement of the target site C-T (G-A), cleaves a single target locus, and produces a staggering cut; (F) ABE system compliments a single base substitution of A-G (T-C), cleaving at the targeted loci, and displaces the DNA fragment, leaving a staggering end in dsDNA (Provided by BioRender.com; accessed on 14 March 2022).
Figure 2CRISPR/Cas system delivery technology, transferring foreign recombinant DNA by the CRISPR/Cas9. From the left side, (1) agrobacterium tumefaciens, (2) gene gun, (3) virus vector, (4) nanoparticles, (5) PEG, and (6) liposome carrying the targeted gene into the plant cell, which is further cultured (Provided by BioRender.com; accessed on 14 March 2022).
Application of CRISPR/Cas system in woody plants.
| Species Name | Target Gene | Tool | Trait Performance | Transformation Method | Editing Efficiency | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Decreased lignin content, discoloration of stems | Agrobacterium-mediated | 100 | [ | |
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Reduced lignin and increased cellulose | Agrobacterium-mediated | _ | [ | ||
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Negative regulation of secondary wall formation | Agrobacterium-mediated | 48 | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Reduced lignin and increased cellulose | Agrobacterium-mediated | _ | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Reduced xylem development | Agrobacterium-mediated | _ | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Xylem development and reduced wall thickness | Agrobacterium-mediated | _ | [ | |
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Secondary cell wall thinning | Agrobacterium-mediated | _ | [ | ||
|
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | bloom early | PEG-mediated | 3.74–20.11 | [ |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | bloom early | Agrobacterium-mediated | 93 | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | bloom early | Agrobacterium-mediated | 9 | [ | |
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | bloom early | Agrobacterium-mediated | 30–75 | [ | ||
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Melampsora resistance | Agrobacterium-mediated | _ | [ | |
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Cassava Brown Spot Virus resistance | Agrobacterium-mediated | 91 | [ | ||
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Phytophthora resistance | Agrobacterium-mediated | 27 | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Botrytis cinerea resistance | Agrobacterium-mediated | 5.55–27.78 | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Grapevine downy mildew resistance | Agrobacterium-mediated | 20.16 | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | citrus canker resistance | Agrobacterium-mediated | 14.29–81.25 | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | citrus canker resistance | Agrobacterium-mediated | 11.5–64.7 | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | citrus canker resistance | Agrobacterium-mediated | 23.80–89.36 | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | citrus canker resistance | Agrobacterium-mediated | 68.2–85.7 | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 base editing | herbicide-resistant | Agrobacterium-mediated | - | [ | |
|
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | salt resistant | Agrobacterium-mediated | _ | [ |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | drought resistance | Agrobacterium-mediated | _ | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | drought resistance | Agrobacterium-mediated | _ | [ | |
|
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | albinism | Agrobacterium-mediated | 3.2–3.9 | [ |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | albinism | Agrobacterium-mediated | 51.7 | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | albinism | Agrobacterium-mediated | 31.8 | [ | |
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | albinism | Agrobacterium-mediated | _ | [ | ||
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | albinism | Agrobacterium-mediated | 90–100 | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | albinism | Agrobacterium-mediated | 45.5–75 | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | albinism | Agrobacterium-mediated | 30.4 | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | albinism | Agrobacterium-mediated | 66.7–100 | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | albinism | PEG-mediated | 12.5 | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | albinism | Agrobacterium-mediated | _ | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas12 | albinism | Agrobacterium-mediated | _ | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Reduced proanthocyanidin accumulation | Agrobacterium-mediated | 93.33–100 | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Increased anthocyanins and procyanidins | Agrobacterium-mediated | _ | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Increased anthocyanin accumulation | Agrobacterium-mediated | _ | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Partial reduction in salicylin content | Agrobacterium-mediated | 40 | [ | |
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Reduced punicalagin content | Agrobacterium-mediated | _ | [ | ||
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Reduced tartaric acid content | Agrobacterium-mediated | 100 | [ | |
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Decrease in caffeine | Agrobacterium-mediated | _ | [ | ||
|
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Plant height reduction | Agrobacterium-mediated | _ | [ |
| Ma bamboo ( |
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Plant height increase | Agrobacterium-mediated | 40 | [ | |
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | nodulation, bisexual flowers | Agrobacterium-mediated | 48–89 | [ | ||
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | increased stem branching | Agrobacterium-mediated | 66.7 | [ | ||
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Enhance the growth of shoots | Agrobacterium-mediated | _ | [ | |
|
|
| CRISPR/Cas9 | Promote lateral root formation | Agrobacterium-mediated | 10–98 | [ |
Figure 3Features of CRISPR-based genome editing in woody plants (Provided by Microsoft PowerPoint 2019).