Literature DB >> 31858701

Robust CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing and its application in manipulating plant height in the first generation of hexaploid Ma bamboo (Dendrocalamus latiflorus Munro).

Shanwen Ye1, Gang Chen1, Markus V Kohnen1, Wenjia Wang1, Changyang Cai1, WenSha Ding1, Chu Wu1, Lianfeng Gu1, Yushan Zheng1, Xiangqing Ma1, Chentao Lin2, Qiang Zhu1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  CRISPR; Cas9; bamboo; genome editing

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31858701      PMCID: PMC7292545          DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J        ISSN: 1467-7644            Impact factor:   9.803


× No keyword cloud information.
Bamboo is a special grass to human due to its great economic and ecological values. Around 2.5 billion people are directly producing and consuming bamboo, and its international trade reached 68.8 billion US dollars in 2018 (Data from International Bamboo and Rattan Organization). One major bamboo species in Asia is Ma bamboo (Dendrocalamus latiflorus Munro), which is a hexaploid species with three subgenomes (2n = 72, AABBCC; Guo et al., 2019). Despite its agronomic importance, it is nearly impossible to modify bamboo traits by traditional breeding as it takes over 70 years to flower. Bamboo research largely lagged behind due to the lack of efficient genetic manipulation tools. The CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeat)/Cas9 provides straightforward ways for genome editing in many plants (Yin et al., 2017), but has never been applied in bamboo. Here, we reported the generation of bamboo mutants with CRISPR/Cas9 technology by targeting one specific copy or all homoeologous genes. Since our recently established genetic transformation protocol is time‐consuming (~1.5 years; Ye et al., 2017), we optimized the CRISPR/Cas9 system in bamboo protoplast. We first improved the protoplast preparation methods and could isolate 3.0 x 106 protoplasts/g fresh leaves. Next, we improved the PEG‐mediated transformation method and reached efficiencies of 53.3% for a single plasmid and 29.8% for two cotransformed plasmids (Figure 1A), which is sufficient for optimizing the CRISPR/Cas9 system. The maize UBI promoter was used to drive Cas9 expression (Ye et al., 2017). Three polymerase III‐dependent promoters from rice (OsU6a/OsU6b/OsU6c) were selected to express the sgRNA cassettes (Ma et al., 2015), as bamboo exhibits high genomic similarity with rice (Peng et al., 2013). To check the effectiveness of CRISPR/Cas9 constructs, a frameshift mutated GFP (mGFP) containing an additional ‘guanine’ thereby produces no fluorescence signal was simultaneously cotransformed with CRISPR/Cas9 plasmids (Figure 1B). Around 1.8% of the protoplasts transformed with the UBI‐Cas9/OsU6b‐sgRNA construct showed strong signals within 72 h, indicating that the mGFP function was restored by the CRISPR/Cas9 system through deleting the additional ‘guanine’ (Figure 1C). The OsU6a and OsU6c promoters work as well, however, with lower efficiency than the OsU6b promoter, as positive signals were only occasionally observed with more than 10 replicates. Taking together, the UBI‐Cas9/OsU6b‐sgRNA construct effectively works in bamboo protoplast and was used for the following endogenous gene editing in Ma bamboo.
Figure 1

Genome editing in Ma bamboo using CRISPR/Cas9 technology (A) Bamboo protoplast isolation and transformation. a. Microscopic image of isolated bamboo protoplast transformed with 35S:tdTomato. b‐d. Images of bamboo protoplasts co‐expressing the fluorescence proteins tdTomato (b) and GFP (c) driven by the 35S promoter, and their overlay (d). (B) CRISPR/Cas9 plasmids for bamboo protoplast. Top: CRISPR/Cas9 constructs expressing the sgRNA directed against mGFP and driven by OsU6a/OsU6b/OsU6c, respectively; middle: mGFP expression construct, mGFP contains one additional guanine (lower‐green case) downstream of the translational start site (red); and bottom: GFP expression construct. The sgRNA was designed to produce the presumptive cleavage site at the third nucleotide upstream of the PAM sequence (blue). (C) Representative bamboo protoplasts cotransfected with mGFP and OsU6b‐sgRNA/UBI‐Cas9 reproducibly emitting fluorescence signals (red arrows). (D) DlmPSY1 gene structure and sequences of the target sites. Grey boxes: exons; black lines: introns; number in brackets: positions of start codon, stop codon and sgRNA target sites (red and orange rectangles). The PAM regions (blue), SNPs (red) and nucleotide sequences of the sgRNAs and DlmPSY1 genes were given. (E) Frequencies of the CRISPR/Cas9‐induced mutations in two target sites of the DlmPSY1. (F) Representative DlmPSY1 mutations at the sgRNA1 site. T0‐1, T0‐2, T0‐3, T0‐12 and T0‐13 represent loss of function mutants. T0‐10 and T0‐26 lines contain heterozygote mutations in the C1 subgenome and chimeric mutations in the A1 subgenome, respectively. Red: sgRNA target regions; blue: PAM regions; green lowercase letters: nucleotide indels; dotted lines: omitted nucleotides. (G) Frequencies of indels (left) and mutation types (right) at the sgRNA1 site of DlmPSY1. i# and d#: # of bp inserted or deleted, respectively; d ≥ 14: more than 14 bp deletion; i + d: target sites with both deletions and insertions. (H) Representative DlmPSY1 mutants at the sgRNA2 site. The represents homozygote (T0‐12), biallelic (T0‐14) and heterozygote (T0‐30 to T0‐32) at A1 subgenome were shown. (I) Frequencies of indels (left) and mutation types (right) at the sgRNA2 site of DlmPSY1. (legend: see G). (J) Phenotypes of representative dlmpsy1 mutants. a‐c, Wild‐type; d‐f, dlmpsy1 mutant (T0‐1). (K‐N) Phenotypes of wild‐type and the represented grg1 mutant. Growth phenotype (K) and internode elongation (L) of 5‐month‐old wild‐type (a) and grg1 (b) plants grown in the greenhouse. Plant heights (M) and internode lengths (N) were quantified. ∗∗: P < 0.01. (O) Mutations of the GRG1 gene were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. The sgRNA target regions (red), PAM regions (blue), nucleotide insertions (green) and their length (right side) are shown.

Genome editing in Ma bamboo using CRISPR/Cas9 technology (A) Bamboo protoplast isolation and transformation. a. Microscopic image of isolated bamboo protoplast transformed with 35S:tdTomato. b‐d. Images of bamboo protoplasts co‐expressing the fluorescence proteins tdTomato (b) and GFP (c) driven by the 35S promoter, and their overlay (d). (B) CRISPR/Cas9 plasmids for bamboo protoplast. Top: CRISPR/Cas9 constructs expressing the sgRNA directed against mGFP and driven by OsU6a/OsU6b/OsU6c, respectively; middle: mGFP expression construct, mGFP contains one additional guanine (lower‐green case) downstream of the translational start site (red); and bottom: GFP expression construct. The sgRNA was designed to produce the presumptive cleavage site at the third nucleotide upstream of the PAM sequence (blue). (C) Representative bamboo protoplasts cotransfected with mGFP and OsU6b‐sgRNA/UBI‐Cas9 reproducibly emitting fluorescence signals (red arrows). (D) DlmPSY1 gene structure and sequences of the target sites. Grey boxes: exons; black lines: introns; number in brackets: positions of start codon, stop codon and sgRNA target sites (red and orange rectangles). The PAM regions (blue), SNPs (red) and nucleotide sequences of the sgRNAs and DlmPSY1 genes were given. (E) Frequencies of the CRISPR/Cas9‐induced mutations in two target sites of the DlmPSY1. (F) Representative DlmPSY1 mutations at the sgRNA1 site. T0‐1, T0‐2, T0‐3, T0‐12 and T0‐13 represent loss of function mutants. T0‐10 and T0‐26 lines contain heterozygote mutations in the C1 subgenome and chimeric mutations in the A1 subgenome, respectively. Red: sgRNA target regions; blue: PAM regions; green lowercase letters: nucleotide indels; dotted lines: omitted nucleotides. (G) Frequencies of indels (left) and mutation types (right) at the sgRNA1 site of DlmPSY1. i# and d#: # of bp inserted or deleted, respectively; d ≥ 14: more than 14 bp deletion; i + d: target sites with both deletions and insertions. (H) Representative DlmPSY1 mutants at the sgRNA2 site. The represents homozygote (T0‐12), biallelic (T0‐14) and heterozygote (T0‐30 to T0‐32) at A1 subgenome were shown. (I) Frequencies of indels (left) and mutation types (right) at the sgRNA2 site of DlmPSY1. (legend: see G). (J) Phenotypes of representative dlmpsy1 mutants. a‐c, Wild‐type; d‐f, dlmpsy1 mutant (T0‐1). (K‐N) Phenotypes of wild‐type and the represented grg1 mutant. Growth phenotype (K) and internode elongation (L) of 5‐month‐old wild‐type (a) and grg1 (b) plants grown in the greenhouse. Plant heights (M) and internode lengths (N) were quantified. ∗∗: P < 0.01. (O) Mutations of the GRG1 gene were confirmed by Sanger sequencing. The sgRNA target regions (red), PAM regions (blue), nucleotide insertions (green) and their length (right side) are shown. The putative phytoene synthase (PSY1) in bamboo, whose homolog in maize functions in carotenoid biosynthesis (Zhu et al., 2016), was selected for the initial test. Three bamboo PSY1 alleles (DlmPSY1‐A, DlmPSY1‐B and DlmPSY1‐C) were identified and cloned by a homology cloning strategy (Figure 1D). To mutate all copies of DlmPSY1, sgRNA1 targeting a conserved site among all DlmPSY1 loci was designed (Figure 1D). In addition, the sgRNA2 target site containing 2–3 single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the spacer region among three DlmPSY1 homoeoalleles was selected to test the tolerance of sgRNA mismatches (Figure 1D). A total of 1600 bamboo calluses induced from stem were transformed as described previously (Ye et al., 2017). In total, 34 independent transgenic lines were confirmed positive (2.1%) by PCR. Based on Sanger sequencing results, 22 (100%) and 10 (83.3%) independent T0 lines were edited in the sgRNA1 and sgRNA2 regions, respectively (Figure 1E), indicating that both constructs effectively induce endogenous gene editing. The editing profiles were further analysed by sequencing. Eighteen lines (81.8%) contained putative homozygote/biallelic mutations in all subgenomes at the sgRNA1 target site. In some lines, putative homozygote/biallelic mutations exist in one subgenome, while heterozygote or chimeric mutations appear in other subgenomes (T0‐10 and T0‐26; Figure 1F). Eight mutation types were identified from 590 independent clones (Figure 1G). The most frequent mutation type was deletion (75%), of which 59.1% are small deletions (<2 bp). The ratios of large fragment deletions (≥14 bp), insertions and combined indels were 15.9%, 2.21% and 7.82%, respectively (Figure 1G). Since bamboo propagates through asexual budding, those homozygote/biallelic mutations will remain in the genome of their offspring clones during breeding. sgRNA2 that perfectly targets DlmPSY1‐A1, but not DlmPSY1‐B1 or DlmPSY1‐C1 was designed to study the recognition specificity (Figure 1D). Sequencing results confirmed that 10 transgenic lines contain mutations in DlmPSY1‐A1, but none in DlmPSY1‐B1 and DlmPSY1‐C1 (Figure 1E). Two lines (20%) were putative homozygous or biallelic mutations (T0‐12 and T0‐14), while 7 lines (70%) were heterozygous/chimeric (T0‐30 to T0‐32 as representative examples, Figure 1H). The ratios of deletions, insertions and combined mutations were 86%, 9% and 5%, respectively (Figure 1I). The mutations were predominantly short nucleotide changes (1–26 bp), and 22.7% were 1bp nucleotide deletions (Figure 1I). Those data demonstrated the successful application of the CRISPR/Cas9 system in mutating a specific DlmPSY1 allele. Eighteen lines (81.8%) with homozygote/biallelic mutations in all subgenomes at the sgRNA1 site exhibited albino phenotypes (Figure 1J), which appeared at an early stage during tissue culture and persisted at the plantlets stage (Figure 1J). Those results suggest that genome editing takes place at an early stage in embryonic cells and led to the loss of function of all DlmPSY1 alleles. Similar results were reported in rice, wheat or cotton (Wang et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2018; Zhang et al., 2014). In case of sgRNA2, although DlmPSY1‐A was mutated, no visible phenotypic change was observed due to the existence of the wild‐type DlmPSY1‐B and DlmPSY1‐C alleles. Next, we applied this technology in bamboo molecular research. Bamboo is the tallest grass in the world, while the underlying mechanism is unknown. Previously, we identified several Gibberellin‐responsive genes including GRG1 (GA‐responsive gene 1, PH01004823G0070) that potentially acts in controlling bamboo height (Zhang et al., 2018). Here, two homozygote grg1 mutants (efficiency 40%) in Ma bamboo were produced using our optimized CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Mutation in GRG1 increased plant height (Figure 1K), mostly due to elongated internodes (Figure 1L‐N). Sequencing results confirmed that the grg1 mutant has the putative homozygous mutation in A1 subgenome, biallelic mutation in B1 subgenome and homozygous mutation in C1 subgenome (Figure 1O), indicating the loss of function of GRG1 in transgenic bamboo. To our knowledge, this is the first example on controlling bamboo height through gene manipulation, which will contribute to subsequent studies on the molecular mechanisms behind the fast growth of bamboo. In summary, for the first time we engineered the hexaploid Ma bamboo through CRISPR/Cas9 technology. The homozygote mutations were obtained in the first generation of transgenic lines, which are extremely important for bamboo species due to its long vegetative growth periods. We also confirmed the albino phenotype of dlmpsy1 mutant in bamboo and generated a bamboo mutant with altered plant height. This demonstrates the applicability of CRISPR/Cas9 in bamboo and thereby boosts future bamboo research and breeding.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China grant (No. 31870660), Fujian Innovative Center for Germplasm Resources and Cultivation of Woody plants (No. 125/KLA15001E), Program for scientific and technological innovation team in university of Fujian province (No. 118/KLA18069A) to Q.Z. The funding bodies were not involved in the design of the study or in any aspect of the data collection, analysis and interpretation of data and in paper writing.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Authors’ contributions

Q.Z. conceived this project. L.F.G., Y.S.Z., X.Q.M. C.T.L. and Q.Z. designed experiments and interpreted the results. S.W.Y., G.C. and M.V.K. performed the experiments and analysed the data. W.J.W., C.Y.C., C.W. and D.W.S. helped to perform the experiments and collect the data. All authors read and approved the submission of this manuscript.
  11 in total

1.  The CRISPR/Cas9 system produces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation.

Authors:  Hui Zhang; Jinshan Zhang; Pengliang Wei; Botao Zhang; Feng Gou; Zhengyan Feng; Yanfei Mao; Lan Yang; Heng Zhang; Nanfei Xu; Jian-Kang Zhu
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 9.803

2.  The draft genome of the fast-growing non-timber forest species moso bamboo (Phyllostachys heterocycla).

Authors:  Zhenhua Peng; Ying Lu; Lubin Li; Qiang Zhao; Qi Feng; Zhimin Gao; Hengyun Lu; Tao Hu; Na Yao; Kunyan Liu; Yan Li; Danlin Fan; Yunli Guo; Wenjun Li; Yiqi Lu; Qijun Weng; CongCong Zhou; Lei Zhang; Tao Huang; Yan Zhao; Chuanrang Zhu; Xinge Liu; Xuewen Yang; Tao Wang; Kun Miao; Caiyun Zhuang; Xiaolu Cao; Wenli Tang; Guanshui Liu; Yingli Liu; Jie Chen; Zhenjing Liu; Licai Yuan; Zhenhua Liu; Xuehui Huang; Tingting Lu; Benhua Fei; Zemin Ning; Bin Han; Zehui Jiang
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2013-02-24       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  A Robust CRISPR/Cas9 System for Convenient, High-Efficiency Multiplex Genome Editing in Monocot and Dicot Plants.

Authors:  Xingliang Ma; Qunyu Zhang; Qinlong Zhu; Wei Liu; Yan Chen; Rong Qiu; Bin Wang; Zhongfang Yang; Heying Li; Yuru Lin; Yongyao Xie; Rongxin Shen; Shuifu Chen; Zhi Wang; Yuanling Chen; Jingxin Guo; Letian Chen; Xiucai Zhao; Zhicheng Dong; Yao-Guang Liu
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 13.164

Review 4.  Progress and prospects in plant genome editing.

Authors:  Kangquan Yin; Caixia Gao; Jin-Long Qiu
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 15.793

5.  Genome Sequences Provide Insights into the Reticulate Origin and Unique Traits of Woody Bamboos.

Authors:  Zhen-Hua Guo; Peng-Fei Ma; Guo-Qian Yang; Jin-Yong Hu; Yun-Long Liu; En-Hua Xia; Mi-Cai Zhong; Lei Zhao; Gui-Ling Sun; Yu-Xing Xu; You-Jie Zhao; Yi-Chi Zhang; Yu-Xiao Zhang; Xue-Mei Zhang; Meng-Yuan Zhou; Ying Guo; Cen Guo; Jing-Xia Liu; Xia-Ying Ye; Yun-Mei Chen; Yang Yang; Bin Han; Choun-Sea Lin; Ying Lu; De-Zhu Li
Journal:  Mol Plant       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 13.164

6.  Efficiency and Inheritance of Targeted Mutagenesis in Maize Using CRISPR-Cas9.

Authors:  Jinjie Zhu; Ning Song; Silong Sun; Weilong Yang; Haiming Zhao; Weibin Song; Jinsheng Lai
Journal:  J Genet Genomics       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 4.275

7.  High efficient multisites genome editing in allotetraploid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) using CRISPR/Cas9 system.

Authors:  Pengcheng Wang; Jun Zhang; Lin Sun; Yizan Ma; Jiao Xu; Sijia Liang; Jinwu Deng; Jiafu Tan; Qinghua Zhang; Lili Tu; Henry Daniell; Shuangxia Jin; Xianlong Zhang
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 9.803

8.  An Efficient Plant Regeneration and Transformation System of Ma Bamboo (Dendrocalamus latiflorus Munro) Started from Young Shoot as Explant.

Authors:  Shanwen Ye; Changyang Cai; Huibo Ren; Wenjia Wang; Mengqi Xiang; Xiaoshan Tang; Caiping Zhu; Tengfei Yin; Li Zhang; Qiang Zhu
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Transcriptome characterization of moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) seedlings in response to exogenous gibberellin applications.

Authors:  Hangxiao Zhang; Huihui Wang; Qiang Zhu; Yubang Gao; Huiyuan Wang; Liangzhen Zhao; Yongsheng Wang; Feihu Xi; Wenfei Wang; Yanqiu Yang; Chentao Lin; Lianfeng Gu
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 4.215

10.  Robust CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing and its application in manipulating plant height in the first generation of hexaploid Ma bamboo (Dendrocalamus latiflorus Munro).

Authors:  Shanwen Ye; Gang Chen; Markus V Kohnen; Wenjia Wang; Changyang Cai; WenSha Ding; Chu Wu; Lianfeng Gu; Yushan Zheng; Xiangqing Ma; Chentao Lin; Qiang Zhu
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 9.803

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Genome editing in fruit, ornamental, and industrial crops.

Authors:  Fabiola Ramirez-Torres; Rishikesh Ghogare; Evan Stowe; Pedro Cerdá-Bennasser; Maria Lobato-Gómez; Bruce A Williamson-Benavides; Patricia Sarai Giron-Calva; Seanna Hewitt; Paul Christou; Amit Dhingra
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.145

2.  Robust CRISPR/Cas9 mediated genome editing and its application in manipulating plant height in the first generation of hexaploid Ma bamboo (Dendrocalamus latiflorus Munro).

Authors:  Shanwen Ye; Gang Chen; Markus V Kohnen; Wenjia Wang; Changyang Cai; WenSha Ding; Chu Wu; Lianfeng Gu; Yushan Zheng; Xiangqing Ma; Chentao Lin; Qiang Zhu
Journal:  Plant Biotechnol J       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 9.803

3.  Genome-wide identification, evolution and expression analysis of the aspartic protease gene family during rapid growth of moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis) shoots.

Authors:  Xiaqin Wang; Xinyang Yan; Shubin Li; Yun Jing; Lianfeng Gu; Shuangquan Zou; Jin Zhang; Bobin Liu
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2021-01-10       Impact factor: 3.969

4.  An Efficient Genetic Transformation and CRISPR/Cas9-Based Genome Editing System for Moso Bamboo (Phyllostachys edulis).

Authors:  Biyun Huang; Renying Zhuo; Huijin Fan; Yujun Wang; Jing Xu; Kangming Jin; Guirong Qiao
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Metabolic Profiling and Transcriptome Analysis Reveal the Key Role of Flavonoids in Internode Coloration of Phyllostachys violascens cv. Viridisulcata.

Authors:  Han-Tian Wei; Dan Hou; Muhammad Furqan Ashraf; Hai-Wen Lu; Juan Zhuo; Jia-Long Pei; Qi-Xia Qian
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 6.  CRISPR-Based Genome Editing and Its Applications in Woody Plants.

Authors:  Tian Min; Delight Hwarari; Dong'ao Li; Ali Movahedi; Liming Yang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-09-05       Impact factor: 6.208

7.  Comparative Genomics Reveals Potential Mechanisms of Plant Beneficial Effects of a Novel Bamboo-Endophytic Bacterial Isolate Paraburkholderia sacchari Suichang626.

Authors:  Kai Wang; Ying Wu; Mengyuan Ye; Yifan Yang; Fred O Asiegbu; Kirk Overmyer; Shenkui Liu; Fuqiang Cui
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Organelle Visualization With Multicolored Fluorescent Markers in Bamboo.

Authors:  Mengdi Zhang; Shuai Hu; Fang Yi; Yanli Gao; Dongmei Zhu; Yizhu Wang; Yi Cai; Dan Hou; Xinchun Lin; Jinbo Shen
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 5.753

Review 9.  Entailing the Next-Generation Sequencing and Metabolome for Sustainable Agriculture by Improving Plant Tolerance.

Authors:  Muhammad Furqan Ashraf; Dan Hou; Quaid Hussain; Muhammad Imran; Jialong Pei; Mohsin Ali; Aamar Shehzad; Muhammad Anwar; Ali Noman; Muhammad Waseem; Xinchun Lin
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.