| Literature DB >> 33329659 |
Yi An1, Ya Geng1, Junguang Yao1, Chunxiang Fu2, Mengzhu Lu1, Chun Wang3, Juan Du4.
Abstract
The ability to create targeted mutations using clustered regularly inter-spaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated (Cas) 9 in support of forest tree biotechnology is currently limited. CRISPR/Cas12a is a novel CRISPR effector protein that not only broadens the CRISPR/Cas targeting range but also enables the generation of large-fragment deletions. In this study, a CRISPR/Cas12a system was evaluated for the induction of targeted mutations in the woody tree poplar (Populus alba × Populus glandulosa). Three Cas12a nucleases, namely, AsCas12a (Acidaminococcus sp. BV3L6), LbCas12a (Lachnospiraceae bacterium ND2006), and FnCas12a (Francisella tularensis subsp. novicidain U112), were used. We knocked out multiple targets of the phytoene desaturase gene 8 (PDS) using the CRISPR/Cas12a genome-targeting system, and the results indicated that the AsCas12a system is the most efficient. We further optimized the co-cultivation temperature after Agrobacterium-mediated transformation from 22 to 28°C to increase the Cas12a nuclease editing efficiency in poplar. AsCas12a showed the highest mutation efficiency, at 70%, and the majority of editing sites were composed of large-fragment deletions. By using this simple and high-efficiency CRISPR/Cas12a system, multiple targets can be modified to obtain multigene simultaneous knockout mutants in tree species, which will provide powerful tools with which to facilitate genetic studies of forest trees.Entities:
Keywords: CRISPR; Cas12a; PagPDS; Populus; genome editing; heat stress
Year: 2020 PMID: 33329659 PMCID: PMC7720674 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.593938
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
FIGURE 1Schematic diagrams illustrating of the PagPDS target sites and the structure of vectors in the CRISPR/Cas12a system. (A) Schematic diagrams illustrating the PagPDS target sites (T1–T5) and the corresponding. The PAMs (5′-TTTV-3′) are denoted in red. Blue boxes indicate exons (CDS1–CDS4); orange lines indicate introns; the red number indicates the number of nucleotides between different targets. (B) Structure of vectors used in the CRISPR/Cas12a system. The intermediate vector AtU6-26 and binary vector pC1300-Cas12a. (C) T-DNA region of the constructed gene editing vector.
FIGURE 2Phenotypes and mutation frequency of the transgenic plants. (A) Phenotypes of the PagPDS-AsCas12a/LbCas12a/FnCas12a-mediated transgenic plants. Scale bar = 1 cm. (B) Determination of mutation rate in transgenic T0 poplar plants generated with the CRISPR/Cas12a system under room temperature (22°C). CK, empty vector. ND, not determined.
FIGURE 3Repeated heat stress treatment increases the efficiency of targeted mutagenesis in calli of 84K poplar. (A) Schematic representation of the culture conditions for callus exposure to heat stress at 28°C. (B) Phenotypes of the transgenic plants induced with the CRISPR/Cas12a system at room temperature (22°C) and under heat stress (28°C–22°C). Calli were grown for 6 weeks. Bud induced at 1 month. (C) Determination of mutation types in transgenic T0 poplar plants induced with the CRISPR/Cas12a system under heat stress. CK, empty vector. ND, not determined. (D) Albinism and pale green plant frequency induced at room temperature (22°C) and under heat stress (28°C–22°C). Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 3 experiments). Each experiment is composed of three biological replicates. Asterisks indicate a significant difference (*P < 0.05; one-way ANOVA; ns, non-significant difference).
FIGURE 4Phenotypes of T0 transgenic plants of 84K poplar plants with PagPDS-AsCas12a. (A) All editing events in different target sites in AsCas12a-mediated T0 plants harvested in this study. Red letters indicate PAM sequences, blue letters indicate target sites, and “–” indicates deletion. (B) A large-fragment deletion mutant of PagPDS. The sequences from target sites 1 to 3, target sites 1 to 4, and target sites 2 to 4 were lost in the DNA repairing after the Cas12a-mediated break.
Summary of the mutation types at each target site.
| Mutation type | PagPDS-AsCas12a | PagPDS-LbCas12a | PagPDS-FnCas12a | ||||||||||||
| T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | T1 | T2 | T3 | T4 | T5 | |
| Biallelic mutation | 11 | 10 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Homozygous mutation | 9 | 10 | 13 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Heterozygous mutation | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unmodified | 9 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 30 | 23 | 20 | 26 | 28 | 30 | 28 | 28 | 30 | 30 | 30 |
| Mutation rate | 70% | 70% | 56.7% | 40% | 0 | 23.3% | 33.3% | 13.3% | 6.7% | 0 | 6.7% | 6.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Examination of the co-mutation frequencies of the five target sites.
| Single | Double | Triple | Quadruple | Quintuple | ||
| Heat stress | 0 | 10% (3) | 23.3% (7) | 36.7% (11) | 0 | |
| 0 | 26.7% (8) | 3.3% (1) | 3.3% (1) | 0 | ||
| 0 | 6.7% (2) | 0 | 0 | 0 |