Literature DB >> 31295471

CRISPR-Cas9 system: A new-fangled dawn in gene editing.

Darshana Gupta1, Oindrila Bhattacharjee2, Drishti Mandal2, Madhab Kumar Sen3, Dhritiman Dey3, Adhiraj Dasgupta1, Tawsif Ahmed Kazi4, Rahul Gupta1, Senjuti Sinharoy2, Krishnendu Acharya1, Dhrubajyoti Chattopadhyay5, V Ravichandiran3, Syamal Roy3, Dipanjan Ghosh6.   

Abstract

Till date, only three techniques namely Zinc Finger Nuclease (ZFN), Transcription-Activator Like Effector Nucleases (TALEN) and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats-CRISPR-Associated 9 (CRISPR-Cas9) are available for targeted genome editing. CRISPR-Cas system is very efficient, fast, easy and cheap technique for achieving knock-out gene in the cell. CRISPR-Cas9 system refurbishes the targeted genome editing approach into a more expedient and competent way, thus facilitating proficient genome editing through embattled double-strand breaks in approximately any organism and cell type. The off-target effects of CRISPR Cas system has been circumnavigated by using paired nickases. Moreover, CRISPR-Cas9 has been used effectively for numerous purposes, like knock-out of a gene, regulation of endogenous gene expression, live-cell labelling of chromosomal loci, edition of single-stranded RNA and high-throughput gene screening. The execution of the CRISPR-Cas9 system has amplified the number of accessible scientific substitutes for studying gene function, thus enabling generation of CRISPR-based disease models. Even though many mechanistic questions are left behind to be answered and the system is not yet fool-proof i.e., a number of challenges are yet to be addressed, the employment of CRISPR-Cas9-based genome engineering technologies will increase our understanding to disease processes and their treatment in the near future. In this review we have discussed the history of CRISPR-Cas9, its mechanism for genome editing and its application in animal, plant and protozoan parasites. Additionally, the pros and cons of CRISPR-Cas9 and its potential in therapeutic application have also been detailed here.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  CRISPR-Cas9; Genome editing; Knock in; Knock out

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31295471     DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.116636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Life Sci        ISSN: 0024-3205            Impact factor:   5.037


  36 in total

1.  SUMO conjugation regulates immune signalling.

Authors:  Sushmitha Hegde; Amarendranath Soory; Bhagyashree Kaduskar; Girish S Ratnaparkhi
Journal:  Fly (Austin)       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.160

Review 2.  High-throughput methods for genome editing: the more the better.

Authors:  Yong Huang; Meiqi Shang; Tingting Liu; Kejian Wang
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 3.  Developing Bottom-Up Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Derived Solid Tumor Models Using Precision Genome Editing Technologies.

Authors:  Kelsie L Becklin; Garrett M Draper; Rebecca A Madden; Mitchell G Kluesner; Tomoyuki Koga; Miller Huang; William A Weiss; Logan G Spector; David A Largaespada; Branden S Moriarity; Beau R Webber
Journal:  CRISPR J       Date:  2022-08

Review 4.  Development of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated technology for potential clinical applications.

Authors:  Yue-Ying Huang; Xiao-Yu Zhang; Ping Zhu; Ling Ji
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2022-06-26       Impact factor: 1.534

5.  Concomitant knockout of target and transporter genes in filamentous fungi by genome co-editing.

Authors:  Koichi Tamano
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 3.904

Review 6.  CRISPR-Cas9 based stress tolerance: New hope for abiotic stress tolerance in chickpea (Cicer arietinum).

Authors:  Muhammad Khuram Razzaq; Muhammad Akhter; Ramala Masood Ahmad; Kaiser Latif Cheema; Aiman Hina; Benjamin Karikari; Ghulam Raza; Guangnan Xing; Junyi Gai; Mohsin Khurshid
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2022-04-16       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 7.  Nanoparticle Delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 for Genome Editing.

Authors:  Li Duan; Kan Ouyang; Xiao Xu; Limei Xu; Caining Wen; Xiaoying Zhou; Zhuan Qin; Zhiyi Xu; Wei Sun; Yujie Liang
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.599

8.  Structural basis of Staphylococcus aureus Cas9 inhibition by AcrIIA14.

Authors:  Hongnan Liu; Yuwei Zhu; Zebin Lu; Zhiwei Huang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 9.  Human Long Noncoding RNA Interactome: Detection, Characterization and Function.

Authors:  Marek Kazimierczyk; Marta K Kasprowicz; Marta E Kasprzyk; Jan Wrzesinski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 10.  Insight into the Role of Epigenetic Processes in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Response in Wheat and Barley.

Authors:  Lingyao Kong; Yanna Liu; Xiaoyu Wang; Cheng Chang
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.