| Literature DB >> 36077378 |
Daraz Ahmad1, Zhongwei Zhang1, Haroon Rasheed1, Xiaoyong Xu2, Jinsong Bao1,2,3.
Abstract
Potato is an important crop due to its nutritional value and high yield potential. Improving the quality and quantity of tubers remains one of the most important breeding objectives. Genetic mapping helps to identify suitable markers for use in the molecular breeding, and combined with transgenic approaches provides an efficient way for gaining desirable traits. The advanced plant breeding tools and molecular techniques, e.g., TALENS, CRISPR-Cas9, RNAi, and cisgenesis, have been successfully used to improve the yield and nutritional value of potatoes in an increasing world population scenario. The emerging methods like genome editing tools can avoid incorporating transgene to keep the food more secure. Multiple success cases have been documented in genome editing literature. Recent advances in potato breeding and transgenic approaches to improve tuber quality and quantity have been summarized in this review.Entities:
Keywords: CRISPR; QTL mapping; RNAi; genome selection; plant breeding tools
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36077378 PMCID: PMC9456189 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23179982
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 6.208
Figure 1A schematic flow diagram of genome-assisted breeding. ① A core collection of S. tuberosum germplasm exhibits the trait of interest and wide genetic diversity. ②/③ After genetic resource selection, a trait-based phenotyping assessment is performed, followed by genotyping of selected populations. ④ Genotype-phenotype linkage is detected through various techniques. ⑤ The breeding program results in the development of improved potato varieties.
QTL for potato tuber quality and quantity traits.
|
|
|
|
|
| Starch granule size | SGS02-8 and SGS03-8 | VIII | [ |
| Starch contents | pPt-535988–pPt-538127, toPt-440651 | I | [ |
| pPt-539763 | II | ||
| toPt-437014–pPt-538033 | III | ||
| toPt-438845 | VIII | ||
| pPt-533878 | X | ||
| pPt-471789 | XI | ||
| pPt-656237 | XII | ||
| STM1049-1, STWIN12G, STM1049-3 | I | [ | |
| EAAT_MCGA_381 | III | ||
| EACG_MCAA_191 DS, STM1002-1, STM1002-2 | IV | ||
| EACG_MCAT_925, StI022-3, StI022-5 | VIII | ||
| EATC_MCCG_182 | X | ||
| EACG_MCAA_191 DS, StI017-2DS | XI | ||
| EACC_MCGA_114, EACG_MCAA_119 DS | XII | ||
| PCT_MACT_86, StI022-2 DS, EACG_MCAA_119 DS | Unlinked | ||
| Pain1-A 718 (C 552) 2, Pain1- A 1544 and Pain1-T 741, Pain1-8c | III | [ | |
| InvGE-A 85 (A 86), InvGE-G 95 (G 106) | IX | ||
| InvCD141_T 543 (A 280, T 288, T 339, A 630, C 1030, G 1031, T 1096), InvCD141-G 765 | X | ||
| Stp23-8b | III | [ | |
| CIS | REC_B_05-1 | V | [ |
| CIS_E_07-1 | VII | ||
| Tuber shape | Solcap_snp_c2_34875 | IV | [ |
| Solcap_snp_c2_25485, Solcap_snp_c2_25510 | X | ||
| Solcap_snp_c1_1847 | I | [ | |
| Solcap_snp_c2_54790 | IV | ||
| Solcap_snp_c2_26012, | VII | ||
| Solcap_snp_c1_15594, Solcap_snp_c1_11535 | X | ||
| Tuber skin color | Solcap_snp_c2_31852, Solcap_snp_c2_25759, Solcap_snp_c2_21178 | I | [ |
| solcap_snp_c1_12440 | V | ||
| solcap_snp_c2_4342, solcap_snp_c2_45215 | VII | ||
| solcap_snp_c2_50702, solcap_snp_c2_53902, solcap_snp_c2_15803 | VIII | ||
| solcap_snp_c2_22697 | X | ||
| solcap_snp_c2_39889 | XI | ||
| and solcap_snp_c2_5385 | XII |
Figure 2An overview of agrobacterium-mediated gene transformation in plants. ① Ti-Plasmid isolation from parent cell (Agrobacterium tumefaciens). ② Digestion of the plasmid with specific endonucleases enzymes. ③ Ligation of foreign DNA into the plasmid. ④ Insertion of recombinant-plasmid into the bacterium and its incorporation into plant’s cell nuclear DNA after infection. ⑤ Growth of transgenic plant tissues artificially. ⑥ Development of transgenic potato grown in a field.
Comparison of three different kinds of transgenics to improve potato tubers’ quality and quantity.
|
|
|
|
|
| Conventional | Starch yield |
| [ |
| Tuber yield |
| [ | |
|
| [ | ||
|
| [ | ||
| Amino acid (methionine) |
| [ | |
| Amino acid (cysteine) |
| [ | |
| Astaxanthin |
| [ | |
| Ketocarotenoids |
| [ | |
| Carotenoids | [ | ||
|
| [ | ||
|
| [ | ||
| Ascorbic acid | DHAR | [ | |
| Vitamin-E | [ | ||
| Vitamin B6 |
| [ | |
| CIS |
| [ | |
| [ | |||
|
| [ | ||
| RNAi | Starch quality |
| [ |
|
| [ | ||
| CIS | [ | ||
|
| [ | ||
| TALENS | Starch quality |
| [ |
| CIS |
| [ | |
|
| [ | ||
| CRISPR | Starch quality |
| [ |
| Anti-browning |
| [ | |
| Reducing steroidal alkaloids |
| [ |
Figure 3Overview of CRISPR-Cas9 mediated gene editing. ① A complex of CRISPR-Cas9 genetic scissors and artificially constructed single guide RNA (sgRNA) scans DNA and traces code where a cut has to be made. ② Formation of non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) and homology direct repair (HDR) strands after DNA double-strand break (DSB). ③ Ligation of the DNA DSB by nucleotides addition on the right and deletion on the left result in gene disruption. ④ Repairing the DSB in HDR by employing an externally provided homologous DNA template for copying. The donor template’s DNA sequence is duplicated at the targeted site, which results in a guided repair.