| Literature DB >> 25806042 |
Margaret A Carpenter1, Nigel I Joyce1, Russell A Genet1, Rebecca D Cooper2, Sarah R Murray1, Alasdair D Noble3, Ruth C Butler1, Gail M Timmerman-Vaughan1.
Abstract
Starch phosphorylation is an important aspect of plant metabolism due to its role in starch degradation. Moreover, the degree of phosphorylation of starch determines its physicochemical properties and is therefore relevant for industrial uses of starch. Currently, starch is chemically phosphorylated to increase viscosity and paste stability. Potato cultivars with elevated starch phosphorylation would make this process unnecessary, thereby bestowing economic and environmental benefits. Starch phosphorylation is a complex trait which has been previously shown by antisense gene repression to be influenced by a number of genes including those involved in starch synthesis and degradation. We have used an association mapping approach to discover genetic markers associated with the degree of starch phosphorylation. A diverse collection of 193 potato lines was grown in replicated field trials, and the levels of starch phosphorylation at the C6 and C3 positions of the glucosyl residues were determined by mass spectrometry of hydrolyzed starch from tubers. In addition, the potato lines were genotyped by amplicon sequencing and microsatellite analysis, focusing on candidate genes known to be involved in starch synthesis. As potato is an autotetraploid, genotyping included determination of allele dosage. Significant associations (p < 0.001) were found with SNPs in the glucan water dikinase (GWD), starch branching enzyme I (SBEI) and the starch synthase III (SSIII) genes, and with a SSR allele in the SBEII gene. SNPs in the GWD gene were associated with C6 phosphorylation, whereas polymorphisms in the SBEI and SBEII genes were associated with both C6 and C3 phosphorylation and the SNP in the SSIII gene was associated with C3 phosphorylation. These allelic variants have potential as genetic markers for starch phosphorylation in potato.Entities:
Keywords: glucan water dikinase; phosphorylation; potato; starch; starch branching enzyme; starch synthase
Year: 2015 PMID: 25806042 PMCID: PMC4354307 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00143
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1Comparison between the adjusted means of C3 and C6 phosphorylation from the 2011 and 2012 field trials. The correlation coefficients r were 0.81 and 0.86 respectively.
Figure 2Comparison between the two field trials: adjusted means of C6 and C3 phosphorylation of starch (nmol/mg) from potato tubers. The correlation coefficients r were 0.72 for C6 and 0.62 for C3.
Figure 3Determination of population structure. (A) The mean log likelihood of K (postulated number of subpopulations) for K = 1 to 20, with bars representing ± standard deviation. (B) Delta K for 1 to 20 subpopulations as calculated by Evanno et al. (2005).
Figure 4Beanplot showing the degree of C6 phosphorylation in samples from the 2011 field trial, divided into the four subpopulations determined from SSR data using STRUCTURE. The dotted line represents the overall mean; the long lines across each bean are mean values for that subpopulation, whereas the short lines represent individual potato lines. Similar results were obtained for the C6 2012, C3 2011, and C3 2012 datasets.
Summary of genotyping methods used for each candidate gene.
| 315 | 5 | ||
| 327, 302 | 11, 6 | ||
| 587 | 14 | ||
| 600 | 8 | ||
| 442 | 12 | SSR 12 alleles | |
| 690 | 32 | SSR 5 alleles | |
| 523 | 16 | ||
| SSR (STGBSS) 11 alleles SSR (STWAX-2) 11 alleles InDel 140 bp |
GBSS
insertion/deletion marker was not significantly associated with either phosphorylation trait.
Figure 5Trellis plot of the negative log of . The GBSS InDel is represented by a triangle, SNPs are represented by circles and SSR alleles by squares. A negative log value of 3 corresponds to p = 0.001, and a negative log of 2 corresponds to p = 0.01.
SNP/SSR and trait combinations associated at .
| gwd1ct | C6 2012 | 0.00008 | 0.0057 | 0.422 | 1.42 | T | |
| gwd2gt | C6 2012 | 0.00010 | 0.0057 | C6 2011 | 0.038 | 3.68 | T |
| gwd14ga | C6 2012 | 0.00027 | 0.0102 | C6 2011 | 0.040 | 3.21 | A |
| gwd26ag | C6 2012 | 0.00020 | 0.0057 | C6 2011 | 0.040 | 3.09 | G |
| gwd27cg | C6 2012 | 0.00037 | 0.0105 | 0.456 | 1.28 | C | |
| sbei 2ag | C3 2011 | 0.00010 | 0.0057 | 0.475 | 0.21 | A | |
| sbei 2ag | C6 2011 | 0.00039 | 0.0105 | 0.475 | 0.85 | A | |
| sbei 2ag | C6 2012 | 0.00033 | 0.0105 | 0.475 | 1.24 | A | |
| sbei5tc | C3 2011 | 0.00098 | 0.0202 | C3 2012, C6 2011, C6 2012 | 0.111 | 0.35 | T |
| ssiii7tc | C3 2012 | 0.00010 | 0.0057 | 0.268 | 0.32 | T | |
| ssiii11gc | C3 2012 | 0.00011 | 0.0057 | C3 2011 | 0.273 | 0.31 | G |
| sbeii180 | C3 2011 | 0.00098 | 0.0202 | C3 2012 | 0.004 | 1.45 | 180 |
| sbeii180 | C6 2011 | 0.00074 | 0.0180 | 0.004 | 3.89 | 180 |
Figure 6Beanplots showing the relationship between allele copy number and degree of phosphorylation for representative examples of the most significant SNP/SSRs. The overall mean is shown as a dotted line; the mean value for each allele copy number is shown as a line across the middle of each bean, and results for individual potato lines are shown by the short lines within the beans.