| Literature DB >> 23919263 |
Matthias Fischer1, Lena Schreiber, Thomas Colby, Markus Kuckenberg, Eckhard Tacke, Hans-Reinhard Hofferbert, Jürgen Schmidt, Christiane Gebhardt.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Higher plants evolved various strategies to adapt to chilling conditions. Among other transcriptional and metabolic responses to cold temperatures plants accumulate a range of solutes including sugars. The accumulation of the reducing sugars glucose and fructose in mature potato tubers during exposure to cold temperatures is referred to as cold induced sweetening (CIS). The molecular basis of CIS in potato tubers is of interest not only in basic research on plant adaptation to environmental stress but also in applied research, since high amounts of reducing sugars affect negatively the quality of processed food products such as potato chips. CIS-tolerance varies considerably among potato cultivars. Our objective was to identify by an unbiased approach genes and cellular processes influencing natural variation of tuber sugar content before and during cold storage in potato cultivars used in breeding programs. We compared by two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis the tuber proteomes of cultivars highly diverse for CIS. DNA polymorphisms in genomic sequences encoding differentially expressed proteins were tested for association with tuber starch content, starch yield and processing quality.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23919263 PMCID: PMC3750364 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2229-13-113
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Plant Biol ISSN: 1471-2229 Impact factor: 4.215
Figure 1Reducing sugar content (RSC) in tubers of 40 cultivars during cold storage. RSC represents the amounts of glucose and fructose in freeze dried tuber tissue. Cultivars are coded by numbers shown in Additional file 1: Table S1. (A) RSC before cold storage. Cultivars are ranked according to increasing RSC. (B) RSC after 1, 2, 4 and 12 weeks of cold storage. Cultivars are ranked according to increasing RSC after 4 weeks of cold storage. The arrows indicate cultivars that contain at least one dosage of a leucine aminopeptidase allele, for which the SNP allele A is characteristic. SNP2746 associated highly significant with tuber starch content, starch yield and chip quality after storage at 4°C (Table 3). The inset presents a magnification of the data obtained for cultivar 17 to cultivar 8.
SNPs/Indels associated with tuber starch content (TSC), starch yield (TSY), chip quality after harvest (without cold storage, CQA) and 3 months cold storage (CQS) in the CHIPS-ALL population
| A/ | 0.20 ( | ns | ns | 11.2*** ↑ | 11.6*** ↑ | |
| C/ | 0.13 ( | ns | ns | 6.5** ↑ | 8.7*** ↑ | |
| A/ | 0.02 ( | ns | ns | 7.2*** ↑ | 9.4*** ↑ | |
| G/ | 0.11 ( | 4.1** ↑ | 10.5*** ↑ | 17.5*** ↑ | 14.1*** ↑ | |
| T/ | 0.16 ( | ns | 4.3* ↑ | 7.4** ↑ | 6.1** ↑ |
1Alleles with highly similar distribution in the CHIPS-ALL population and similar associations are shown in parentheses. SNP alleles forming the minor frequency haplotype are italics.
2ns: not significant. The level of significance is indicated by * for 0.05 > p >0.01, ** for 0.01 > p >0.001 and *** for p <0.001. Arrows indicate the direction of effect of the minor frequency allele, which increased average tuber starch content, starch yield and chip quality in all cases.
Figure 2Correlation between mean protein spot intensity and reducing sugar content (RSC) in 40 cultivars without cold treatment. (A) Representative pattern of tuber proteins obtained by 2D-PAGE. Numbered arrows point to the five spots with significant correlation between mean spot intensity and RSC (Table 1). (B-F) Correlation plots of the logarithmic values of mean spot intensity versus RSC. Plots B, C, D, E and F correspond to spots 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5, respectively. Framed numbers indicate potato cultivars listed in Additional file 1: Table S1.
Proteins showing significant (ρ < 0.05) correlation between mean spot intensity and tuber sugar content in 40 cultivars
| 1 | 0,428 | 0,006 | Granule-bound starch synthase | 1718316A | 400012111 | 000000048 | VIII |
| 2 | 0,403 | 0,010 | Granule-bound starch synthase | 1718316A | 400012111 | 000000048 | VIII |
| 3 | -0,345 | 0,029 | Miraculin; Precursor | P13087 | - 3 | - 3 | ? |
| 4 | -0,518 | 0,001 | Putative Kunitz-type tuber invertase inhibitor precursor | AAL60242 | 400010146, 40001043, 400010139 | 000000159 | III |
| 5 | -0,355 | 0,025 | Proteinase inhibitor II | AAO88244 | 400004547 400004548 | 000000400 | III |
1Pearson product–moment correlation coefficient.
2When proteins matched to multiple loci in the potato genome, they were ordered according to decreasing sequence similarity.
3No sequence similarity was detected.
Figure 3Protein spots showing differential expression between genotype pools CIS-t and CIS-s before and/or after cold treatment. A virtual tuber protein pattern was generated by fusing 2D-PAGE gel images from both genotype pools CIS-t and CIS-s at T0. Conditions for protein separation in the first and second dimension are shown on the right. The numbered arrow heads point to the position of the 50 differential proteins described in Table 2, Additional file 4: Table S4 and Additional file 5: Table S5. (A) Proteins from 40 to 200 kDa were separated on IPG strips with immobilized pH gradient of 3–11 in the first dimension (IEF) and by 10% Tris-glycine SDS-PAGE in the second dimension. (B) Proteins between 5 and 40 kDa were separated on pH 3–7 IPG strips in the first dimension and by 16% Tris-tricine polyacrylamide gels in the second dimension.
Tuber proteins differentially expressed in genotype pool CIS-t versus pool CIS-s during 12 weeks storage at 4°C
| 2 | Serine protease inhibitor 7 | P30941.2 | 0,24 ** | 0,19 ** | 0,28 ** | 0,28 ** |
| 4 | Serine protease inhibitor 7 | P30941.2 | 0,28 ** | 0,23 ** | 0,22 * | 0,16 * |
| 3 | Kunitz-type enzyme inhibitor S9C11 | AAL67830.1 | 0,37 * | 0,43 ** | 0,49 ** | 0,6 * |
| 6 | Putative miraculin | CAC40756.1 | 0,58 * | 0,53 ** | 0,62 ** | 0,42 * |
| 14 | Aspartic protease inhibitor 5 | P58519.1 | 0,69 | 0,37 * | n.d. | 0,65 * |
| 10 | Kunitz-type proteinase inhibitor | AAM21645.1 | 0,77 | 0,44 ** | 0,71 * | 0,23 * |
| 11 | Kunitz-type proteinase inhibitor | AAM21645.1 | 0,74 | n.d. | 0,24 *** | n.d. |
| 12 | Kunitz-type proteinase inhibitor | AAM21645.1 | 0,48 | 0,51 * | 0,52 ** | 0,43 ** |
| 19 | Putative miraculin | CAC40756.1 | 3,64 * | 5,02 ** | 2,85 ** | 4,34 ** |
| 20 | Cysteine protease inhibitor 1 | P20347.3 | n.d. | 4,21 *** | 2,81 *** | 3,32 ** |
| 21 | Proteinase inhibitor II | CAA27730 | 1,54 | 2,89 ** | 1,62 * | 0,99 |
| 22 | Proteinase inhibitor II | CAA27730 | 1,48 | 2,09 * | 1,45 * | 1,59 ** |
| 24 | Proteinase inhibitor II | CAA27730 | 2,89 * | 1,56 * | 1,25 * | 1,59 * |
| 1 | Patatin-2-Kuras 4 | Q3YJT0 | 0,43 * | 0,39 * | 0,55 *** | 0,47 ** |
| 13 | Patatin Group M-3 | Q2MY51 | 0,24 | 0,38 ** | 0,63 * | 0,40 * |
| 44 | Patatin-3-Kuras 1 | Q3YJS9.1 | 2,57 * | 3,37 * | 3,22 * | 2,04 |
| 45 | Patatin-3-Kuras 1 | Q3YJS9.1 | 2,99 * | 2,67 * | 3,20 * | 2,60 * |
| 46 | Patatin-3-Kuras 1 | Q3YJS9.1 | 1,51 | 2,26 | 2,07 * | 1,97 |
| 31 | Lipoxygenase | X95512.1 | 1,42 ** | 1,56 ** | 1,94 ** | 2,17 ** |
| 32 | Lipoxygenase | X95512.1 | 1,56 * | 2,02 ** | 1,65 ** | 1,79 * |
| 33 | Lipoxygenase | X95512.1 | 1,52 | 2,78 ** | 1,73 ** | 1,59 * |
| 34 | Lipoxygenase | X95512.1 | 1,66 | 3,71 * | 1,72 ** | 1,51 * |
| 35 | Lipoxygenase | X95512.1 | 1,45 | 3,90 * | 1,71 * | 1,65 |
| 36 | Phospholipase A1 | ABQ95989.1 | 3,20 *** | 2,82 *** | 7,45 ** | 2,92 * |
| 39 | Phospholipase A1 | ABQ95989.1 | 4,22 *** | 2,59 *** | 3,52 ** | 2,76 ** |
| 40 | Phospholipase A1 | ABQ95989.1 | 3,65 ** | 2,57 ** | 1,59 ** | 2,27 * |
| 43 | Phosphoglycerate kinase | ABB87110 | 0,79 | 2,29 * | n.d. | n.d. |
| 5 | Chloroplast small heat shock protein class I | AAQ19680.1 | 0,24 ** | 0,23 ** | 0,25 * | 0,27 * |
| 27 | Heat shock protein (HSP70) | XP_002512741 | 0,87 | 0,40 * | n.d. | 0,68 * |
| 28 | 101 kDa heat shock protein | AAC83688.2 | 0,85 | 1,13 | 0,48 ** | 0,98 |
| 47 | Leucine aminopeptidase, chloroplastic | P31427.2 | 2,35 * | 2,16 ** | 1,47 * | n.d. |
| 48 | Leucine aminopeptidase, chloroplastic | P31427.2 | 1,82 * | 1,19 | 3,06 ** | 2,16 * |
| 49 | Leucine aminopeptidase, chloroplastic | P31427.2 | 1,43 | 1,78 ** | 2,22 ** | 1,66 |
| 50 | Leucine aminopeptidase, chloroplastic | P31427.2 | n.d. | n.d. | 2,16 ** | 1,26 |
| 17 | Putative PR-10 type pathogenesis-related protein | BAJ25784.1 | 0,39 * | 0,75 | 0,93 | 0,79 |
| 30 | Actin | BAK57343.1 | 0,47 ** | 1,06 | 0,72 * | 1,20 |
| 7 | Not identified | | 0,40 ** | 0,57 ** | 0,57 ** | 0,52 ** |
| 8 | Not identified | | 0,60 * | 0,44 * | 0,39 * | 0,22 * |
| 9 | Not identified | | 0,26** | 0,14** | n.d. | n.d. |
| 15 | Not identified | | 0,46 | 0,46 * | 0,29 * | 0,44 * |
| 16 | Not identified | | n.d. | 0,12 *** | 0,09 *** | 0,26 *** |
| 18 | Not identified | | 3,6 ** | 1,73 * | 1,63* | 1,45 |
| 23 | Not identified | | 3,64 * | 1,62 | 2,04 * | 3,12 ** |
| 25 | Not identified | | 2,20 ** | n.d. | 2,80 ** | n.d. |
| 26 | Not identified | | 1,72 | n.d. | 2,64 *** | 2,69 * |
| 29 | Not identified | | 0,99 | 0,73 * | 0,77 | 0,48 ** |
| 37 | Not identified | | 3,96 ** | 4,25 ** | 4,90 ** | 3,96 ** |
| 38 | Not identified | | 3,06 * | 2,85 *** | 3,88 *** | 2,15 |
| 41 | Not identified | | 2,52 | 1,62 * | 2,06 ** | 2,54 * |
| 42 | Not identified | 1,68 * | 2,99 ** | 2,78 ** | n.d. | |
1Ratio of the mean spot volume of the CIS-t pool to the mean spot volume of the CIS-s pool. Mean spot volume was calculated from three biological replicates. The level of significance is indicated by * for 0.05 > p >0.01, ** for 0.01 > p >0.001 and *** for p <0.001.
n.d. spot not detectable in 2D protein profiles.
2w, 4w and 12w corresponds to weeks of storage at 4°C.
Figure 4Effect of the SNP allele on average RSC of 40 cultivars during cold storage. Cultivars were grouped according to presence (triangles) or absence (squares) of SNP allele A2746. The genotypic groups were tested by ANOVA for significant differences between means of RSC (log transformed) before and after 1, 2, 4 and 12 weeks of cold storage. The mean RSC was different between the genotypic groups at all time points (**: 0.01 > p <0,001; ***: p < 0.001). The amount of variance explained by StLapN-SNP (R2) at the different time points is given as percentage. R2 values increased during cold storage.