| Literature DB >> 31998338 |
Matías Nicolás González1,2, Gabriela Alejandra Massa1,2,3, Mariette Andersson4, Helle Turesson4, Niklas Olsson4, Ann-Sofie Fält4, Leonardo Storani1,2, Cecilia Andrea Décima Oneto2, Per Hofvander4, Sergio Enrique Feingold2.
Abstract
Polyphenol Oxidases (PPOs) catalyze the conversion of phenolic substrates to quinones, leading to the formation of dark-colored precipitates in fruits and vegetables. This process, known as enzymatic browning, is the cause of undesirable changes in organoleptic properties and the loss of nutritional quality in plant-derived products. In potato (Solanum tubersoum L.), PPOs are encoded by a multi-gene family with different expression patterns. Here, we have studied the application of the CRISPR/Cas9 system to induce mutations in the StPPO2 gene in the tetraploid cultivar Desiree. We hypothesized that the specific editing of this target gene would result in a lower PPO activity in the tuber with the consequent reduction of the enzymatic browning. Ribonucleoprotein complexes (RNPs), formed by two sgRNAs and Cas9 nuclease, were transfected to potato protoplasts. Up to 68% of regenerated plants contained mutations in at least one allele of the target gene, while 24% of edited lines carried mutations in all four alleles. No off-target mutations were identified in other analyzed StPPO genes. Mutations induced in the four alleles of StPPO2 gene, led to lines with a reduction of up to 69% in tuber PPO activity and a reduction of 73% in enzymatic browning, compared to the control. Our results demonstrate that the CRISPR/Cas9 system can be applied to develop potato varieties with reduced enzymatic browning in tubers, by the specific editing of a single member of the StPPO gene family.Entities:
Keywords: CRISPR/Cas9; enzymatic browning; genome editing; polyphenol oxidase; potato; ribonucleoprotein complexes
Year: 2020 PMID: 31998338 PMCID: PMC6962139 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01649
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Figure 1sgRNA design on the StPPO2 gene and off target prediction (A) The structure of StPPO2 gene is shown with the theoretical positions of the start (ATG, green box) and stop codons (TAA, red box). The partial sequence used for sgRNA design is shown above the gene structure. Targets sites for sgRNAs are marked in green letters and the PAM (5′-NGG-3′) of each target site is indicated. Black arrowheads indicate the predicted cut site for the Cas9 nuclease (B) Predicted off target sites for sgRNA564 on StPPO1 and StPPO4 genes, with mismatches marked in red letters (C) Alignment of sgRNA157 with StPPO1 and StPPO4 genes, with mismatches marked in red letters.
Figure 2Identification of edited lines using High Resolution Fragment Analysis (HRFA) and characterization of mutations by sequencing (A) Electropherograms of HRFA obtained for wild type Desiree and lines M08001, M08002, and M08003. The orange peaks correspond to the elution points of the size standard and green peaks correspond to elution of the StPPO2 gene fragments. The elution of the wild type fragment is set to 0 and the number of bases inserted (+) or deleted (−) in each fragment is indicated above the respective peak (B) Sequencing of a partial fragment of the StPPO2 alleles in selected lines. Target sites for the sgRNAs are marked in green letters. Deleted nucleotides are indicated as hyphens and inserted bases are marked in red letters. The frequencies obtained during Sanger analysis are indicated, as the number of clones carrying each allelic variant related to the total number of sequenced clones.
Edited lines per experiment detected by HRFA.
| Line | Transfection | Allelic Variants |
|---|---|---|
| – | 0 | |
| 25% PEG | −4/0 | |
| 25% PEG | −4/−1/0 | |
| 25% PEG | −4/0 | |
| 25% PEG | −102/−4/−1/0 | |
| 25% PEG | 0/+46 | |
| 25% PEG | −6/0 | |
| 25% PEG | −5/0 | |
| 25% PEG | −111/0/+1 | |
| 25% PEG | −4/0 | |
| 25% PEG | −5/0 | |
| 25% PEG | −1/0 | |
| 25% PEG | 0/+1 | |
| 25% PEG | −6/−4/0/+1 | |
| 25% PEG | −7/−4 | |
| 25% PEG | −1/0 | |
| 25% PEG | −1/0/+1 | |
| 25% PEG | −3/0/+1 | |
| 25% PEG | 0/+1 | |
| 40% PEG | −111/−5 | |
| 40% PEG | −111/−9/+22 | |
| 40% PEG | −4/0 | |
| 40% PEG | −9/−5/−3/0 | |
| 40% PEG | −111/−15/+121/+302 | |
| 40% PEG | −112/−5/+44 | |
| 40% PEG | 0/+1 | |
| 40% PEG | −115/−8/−5/+55 | |
| 40% PEG | −5/−4/0 | |
| 40% PEG | −111/0/+98 | |
| 40% PEG | −4/0/+45 | |
| 40% PEG | −14/−8/0 | |
| 40% PEG | −114/−11/−5/0 | |
| 40% PEG | −1/0/+48 | |
| 40% PEG | −116/−111/−55/+58 | |
| 40% PEG | −18/−1/0 | |
| 40% PEG | −4/−2/0 | |
| 40% PEG | −118/−111 | |
| 40% PEG | −113/−5/+1 |
The transfection conditions and the allelic variants found in the analysis of all four alleles of StPPO2 are indicated per line. The number 0 indicates the presence of the wild type allele. Alleles with insertions or deletions are indicated as the number of base pairs with a minus (−) or a plus (+) sign, respectively.
Figure 3Screening for off target mutations on StPPO1 and StPPO4 genes by HRFA. Electropherograms of wild type Desiree and line M08001 are shown. The orange peaks correspond to the elution points of the size standard and the elution of the respective wild type fragment is set to 0 (A) Blue peaks correspond to elution of the StPPO1 gene fragments (B) Green peaks correspond to elution of the StPPO4 gene fragments.
Figure 4Discoloration development of selected edited lines at times 0, 24, and 48 h after cutting. Two tubers were randomly selected for each edited line and the control, cut and exposed to the air for 48 h at room temperature (24°C). Photos were taken immediately after cutting (0hs), 24 and 48 h later. T1 and T2 indicate Tuber 1 and Tuber 2 of each line, respectively.
Figure 5Analysis of Relative Enzymatic Browning (A) and Relative PPO Activity (B) in tubers of selected edited lines. Each box represents data of three biological replicates of the edited lines and the control Desiree RC, the line across the box represents the median. The box represents the 25th and the 75th percentiles and whiskers represent the maximum and minimum value. Data are relative to the control line Desiree RC. Statistical differences with the control line Desiree RC are denoted *(p < 0.05).
Effect of each line on Relative Enzymatic Browning and Relative PPO Activity variables.
| Response variable | Fixed effect | Estimate ± SE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 1.00 ± 0.15 | <0.001 | |
| M07056 | −0.60 ± 0.22 | 0.01 | |
| M08001 | −0.73 ± 0.15 | <0.001 | |
| M08002 | −0.73 ± 0.15 | <0.001 | |
| M08003 | 0.19 ± 0.22 | 0.40 | |
| M08008 | −0.68 ± 0.14 | <0.001 | |
| M08027 | −0.67 ± 0.15 | <0.001 | |
| Intercept | 0.48 ± 0.08 | <0.001 | |
| M07056 | −0.13 ± 0.10 | 0.2295 | |
| M08001 | −0.31 ± 0.09 | 0.0047 | |
| M08002 | −0.25 ± 0.11 | 0.0355 | |
| M08003 | 0.13 ± 0.19 | 0.5137 | |
| M08008 | −0.16 ± 0.12 | 0.2057 | |
| M08027 | −0.19 ± 0.09 | 0.0615 |
Parameters estimates and p values were taken from Linear Mixed Models with the Line as a fixed effect and the biological replicate as a random effect. p < 0.05 indicates significant differences with the Desiree RC control line.