| Literature DB >> 35050185 |
Monika Elżbieta Jach1, Anna Serefko2, Maria Ziaja3, Marek Kieliszek4.
Abstract
In recent years, the awareness and willingness of consumers to consume healthy food has grown significantly. In order to meet these needs, scientists are looking for innovative methods of food production, which is a source of easily digestible protein with a balanced amino acid composition. Yeast protein biomass (single cell protein, SCP) is a bioavailable product which is obtained when primarily using as a culture medium inexpensive various waste substrates including agricultural and industrial wastes. With the growing population, yeast protein seems to be an attractive alternative to traditional protein sources such as plants and meat. Moreover, yeast protein biomass also contains trace minerals and vitamins including B-group. Thus, using yeast in the production of protein provides both valuable nutrients and enhances purification of wastes. In conclusion, nutritional yeast protein biomass may be the best option for human and animal nutrition with a low environmental footprint. The rapidly evolving SCP production technology and discoveries from the world of biotechnology can make a huge difference in the future for the key improvement of hunger problems and the possibility of improving world food security. On the market of growing demand for cheap and environmentally clean SCP protein with practically unlimited scale of production, it may soon become one of the ingredients of our food. The review article presents the possibilities of protein production by yeast groups with the use of various substrates as well as the safety of yeast protein used as food.Entities:
Keywords: nutritional biomass; single cell protein; yeast protein
Year: 2022 PMID: 35050185 PMCID: PMC8780597 DOI: 10.3390/metabo12010063
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolites ISSN: 2218-1989
Figure 1Production of single cell protein by yeast.
Reports of yeast protein content produced from specific waste substrates by different yeast species.
| Yeast Species | Waste Substrate | Protein Content | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spruce-derived sugars and protein hydrolysates from chicken by-products | 50% | [ | |
| n-alkanes | 65% | [ | |
| Prawn-shell waste | 60.6–70.4% | [ | |
|
| Rice straw hydrolysate | 58.5% | [ |
|
| Treated distillery sludge | 32% | [ |
|
| Glutamate fermentation wastewater | 55% | [ |
|
| Cheese whey | 48% | [ |
|
| Bagasse hemicelloses hydrolysate | 48% | [ |
|
| Alkaline hydrolysis of olive fruits wastes | 59% | [ |
|
| Treated distillery sludge | 31% | [ |
| Vinasse | 55% | [ | |
|
| Olive mill wastewater | 35.9% | [ |
|
| Sugar cane hemicellulosic hydrolysate (bagasse) | 31% | [ |
| Soy molasses | 56% | [ | |
| Sugarcane bagasse hemicellulosic hydrolysate | 60% | [ | |
|
| Salad oil wastewater | 26% | [ |
| Waste capsicum powder | 29–48% | [ | |
| Fermented rice bran | 33% | [ | |
| Potato starch industry waste | 46% | [ | |
| Poultry litter, waste capsicum powder | 48% | [ | |
| Potato wastewater | 42% | [ | |
| Ethanol, sulfite waste liquor | 50–54% | [ | |
| Tubers wastes | 54% | [ | |
| Pineapple cannery | 55% | [ | |
| Mango waste | 56% | [ | |
| Spruce-derived sugars and protein hydrolysates from chicken by-products | 57% | [ | |
|
| Jerusalem artichoke extract | 53% | [ |
|
| Brewery’ spent grains hemicellulosic hydrolysate | 32% | [ |
|
| Spoiled date palm fruit | 49% | [ |
|
| Cheese whey (lactose) | 45–54% | [ |
|
| Food waste mixture of orange pulp, whey, brewer’s spent grain | 34% | [ |
| Cheese whey | 43% | [ | |
| Paneer whey | 48% | [ | |
|
| Treated distillery sludge | 33% | [ |
| Food waste mixture of orange pulp, molasses, brewer’s spent grain | 39% | [ | |
| Fruit processing residues (pineapple waste) | 45% | [ | |
| Fruit wastes (peels/mesocarps): mango ( | 48% | [ | |
| Vegetable processing residues (potato waste:peels) | 49% | [ | |
| From the beer manufacturing process | 49% | [ | |
| Molasses | 53% | [ | |
| Fruit of Beles ( | 53% | [ | |
| Spruce-derived sugars and protein hydrolysates from chicken by-products | 54% | [ | |
|
| Spruce-derived sugars and protein hydrolysates from chicken by-products | 50% | [ |
|
| Spoiled date palm fruit | 49% | [ |
|
| Crude glycerol | 30% | [ |
| Rye and oat agricultural wastes | 30–44.5% | [ | |
| Biofuel waste | 40–50% | [ | |
| Pure glycerol, raw glycerol | 45% | [ | |
| Industrial glycerol obtained in the production of biofuel from rapeseed | 46% | [ |
Average amounts of protein production of several protein sources (% dry weight) [9,12].
| Organisms | Average Amounts of Protein (% Dry Weight) |
|---|---|
| Bacteria | 50–65% |
| Yeast | 29–65% |
| Algae | 40–60% |
| Fungi | 30–45% |
| Meat | 45% |
| Soybean | 35% |
| Milk | 25% |
Average contents of essential amino acids in protein compared to several protein sources (milligrams of amino acids per 1 g of protein).
| Amino Acids |
|
|
| Wheat | Egg | Cow Milk | FAO Amino Acid Requirements for Adults |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| mg/g Protein (Mean) | |||||||
| Arginine | 46.5 | 48 | 32 | 48 | 11.5 | 33 | - |
| Histidine | 23.5 | 26 | 16 | 16 | 4 | 37 | 15 |
| Isoleucine | 37 | 44 | 48 | 33 | 68 | 40 | 30 |
| Leucine | 63 | 68 | 71 | 67 | 90 | 88 | 59 |
| Lysine | 65 | 70 | 51 | 28 | 63 | 78 | 45 |
| Cysteine | 9 | 11 | 24 | 25 | 24 | 9 | |
| Methionine | 14 | 12 | 15.5 | 15 | 32 | 29 | |
| SAA | 23 | 23 | 39.5 | 40 | 56 | 38 | 22 |
| Phenylalanine | 33 | 40 | 41 | 45 | 63 | 47 | |
| Tryptophan | 9 | 47 | 39 | 11 | 16 | Nd | |
| Tyrosine | 26 | 66 | 20 | 36 | 19,5 | 16 | |
| AAA | 68 | 153 | 100 | 92 | 98.5 | 63 | 38 |
| Threonine | 48 | 48 | 41 | 29 | 50 | 48.7 | 23 |
| Valine | 53 | 53 | 55 | 44 | 74 | 47.9 | 39 |
AAA—Aromatic amino acids: tyrosine, phenylalanine, and tryptophan; FAO—Food and Agricultural Organization; Nd—not determined; SAA—Sulfur amino acids: methionine and cysteine.