| Literature DB >> 30744615 |
Magdalena Rakicka1, Jakub Wolniak2, Zbigniew Lazar2, Waldemar Rymowicz2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Citric acid is considered as the most economically feasible product of microbiological production, therefore studies on cheap and renewable raw materials for its production are highly desirable. In this study citric acid was synthesized by genetically engineered strains of Yarrowia lipolytica from widely available, renewable polysaccharide - inulin. Hydrolysis of inulin by the Y. lipolytica strains was established by expressing the inulinase gene (INU1 gene; GenBank: X57202.1) with its native secretion signal sequence was amplified from genomic DNA from Kluyveromyces marxianus CBS6432. To ensure the maximum citric acid titer, the optimal cultivation strategy-repeated-batch culture was applied.Entities:
Keywords: Citric acid; Inulin; Repeated-batch culture; Yarrowia lipolytica
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30744615 PMCID: PMC6371587 DOI: 10.1186/s12896-019-0503-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Biotechnol ISSN: 1472-6750 Impact factor: 2.563
Fig. 1Growth curves of various Y. lipolytica strains growing on glycose (a), fructose (b) and inulin (c): AWG7 (blue line), AWG7 INU 1 (dark blue line), AWG7 INU 2 (red line), AWG7 INU 3 (yellow line), AWG7 INU 5 (grey line), AWG7 INU 6 (orange line), AWG7 INU 8 (black line), AWG7 INU I (green line). The strains were grown on an YNB/glucose, fructose or inulin medium. Quintuple experiments were performed at 28 °C under constant agitation using Bioscreen C (Oy Growth Curves Ab Ltd.)
Parameters of citric acid synthesis by various Y. lipolytica strains in batch culture
| Strain |
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Substrat | Biomass | Citric acid | Isocitric acid | Mannitol | QCA | YCA | |
| g dm− 3 | g dm− 3 h− 1 | g g− 1 | |||||
| AWG7 Control 1 | Fructose | 12.0 ± 0.8 | 48.7 ± 2.0 | 2.0 ± 0.4 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 0.42 ± 0.7 | 0.49 ± 0.01 |
| AWG7 Control 2 | Glucose | 13.8 ± 1.0 | 72.9 ± 0.8 | 2.5 ± 0.9 | 0.0 | 0.83 ± 0.5 | 0.73 ± 0.01 |
| AWG7 INU 1 | Inulin | 9.0 ± 2.0 | 64.6 ± 1.6 | 1.4 ± 0.2 | 6.6 ± 1.1 | 0.72 ± 0.9 | 0.64 ± 0.02 |
| AWG7 INU 2 | Inulin | 10.5 ± 0.8 | 71.6 ± 0.9 | 1.4 ± 0.5 | 5.3 ± 1.0 | 0.79 ± 0.4 | 0.72 ± 0.02 |
| AWGZ INU 3 | Inulin | 12.0 ± 0.6 | 69.2 ± 1.4 | 1.4 ± 0.7 | 4.1 ± 0.4 | 0.72 ± 0.5 | 0.70 ± 0.01 |
| AWG7 INU I | Inulin | 11.0 ± 1.1 | 58.0 ± 4.1 | 1.4 ± 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.50 ± 0.7 | 0.60 ± 0.02 |
| AWG7 INU 5 | Inulin | 13.0 ± 0.9 | 65.6 ± 1.8 | 1.4 ± 0.5 | 3.7 ± 0.4 | 0.93 ± 0.3 | 0.66 ± 0.01 |
| AWG7 INU 6 | Inulin | 16.5 ± 1.2 | 64.6 ± 2.8 | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 6.1 ± 1.3 | 0.88 ± 0.5 | 0.65 ± 0.02 |
| AWG 7 INU 8 | Inulin | 15.8 ± 0.9 | 75.5 ± 1.5 | 1.5 ± 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.80 ± 0.7 | 0.76 ± 0.02 |
Q productivity of citric acid, Y yield of citric acid
Fig. 2Time courses of biomass production (Δ), citric acid (■) and isociric (♦) acids titer and fructose consumption (●) during repeated batch culture of AWG7 INU 8 (a) and AWG7 INU 5 (b) strains of Y. lipolytica. 40% of medium was replacement for four times. Each variant of RBC was repeated two times
Fig. 3The scheme of increasing product titer during the repeated-batch culture used in this study
Citric acid productivity and yield from inulin for Y. lipolytica strains expressing inulinase gene in repeated batch culture
| Strain | Qov | QH | Yov | YH |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| (g dm− 3 h− 1) | (g g− 1) | |||
| AWG7 INU8 | 0.34 ± 0.02 | 0.51 ± 0.04 | 0.51 ± 0.02 | 0.85 ± 0.03 |
| AWG7 INU5 | 0.37 ± 0.08 | 0.49 ± 0.07 | 0.42 ± 0.01 | 0.61 ± 0.01 |
Q overall productivity of citric acid production, Y overall yield of citric acid production during RBC, Q the highest productivity noticed during the process, Y the highest yield noticed during the process
Fig. 4Time course of inulinase production by Y. lipolytica AWG7 INU 8 (a) and AWG7 INU5 (b) transformants during repated-batch culture on inulin
Citric acid production by various strains of Yarrowia lipolytica
| Strain | System | Substrate | Citric acid (g dm−3) | Q (g dm− 3 h− 1) | Y (g g− 1) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W29 | batch | glucose | 18 | 0.13 | 0.62 | [ |
| N15 | batch | sunflower oil | 150 | 1.32 | 1.56 | [ |
| NG40/UV7 | batch | glycerol | 115 | 0.6 | 0.64 | [ |
| 187/1 | batch | rapeseed oil | 135 | 0.94 | 1.55 | [ |
| H222-S4(p67ICL1)T5 | fed-batch | sucrose | 140 | 0.73 | 0.82 | [ |
| A 101–1.31 | fed-batch | glycerol | 155 | 1.05 | 0.6 | [ |
| AWG7 | repeated-batch | glycerol | 154 | 0.94 | 0.6 | [ |
| AWG7 | repeated-batch | glycerol | 154 | 1.05 | 0.78 | [ |
| A101–1.22 | repeated-batch | glycerol | 124 | 0.85 | 0.6 | [ |
| SWJ-1b | batch | inulin | 68.9 | 0.22 | 0,68 | [ |
| SWJ-1b 30 | batch | inulin | 84 | 0.39 | 0.84 | [ |
| AWG7 | continuous | glycerol | 97.8 | 0.49 | 0.98 | [ |
| AWG7 INU 5 | repeated-batch | inulin | 170 | 0.49a | 0.61b | This study |
| AWG7 INU 8 | repeated-batch | inulin | 203 | 0.51a | 0.85b | This study |
a the highest productivity noticed during the process, b the highest yield noticed during the process
Q – productivity of citric acid, Y – yield of citric acid production