Literature DB >> 34474100

GalNAc-siRNA conjugates: Prospective tools on the frontier of anti-viral therapeutics.

Lokesh Thangamani1, Balamuralikrishnan Balasubramanian2, Murugesh Easwaran3, Jeyakumar Natarajan4, Karthika Pushparaj5, Arun Meyyazhagan6, Shanmughavel Piramanayagam7.   

Abstract

The growing use of short-interfering RNA (siRNA)-based therapeutics for viral diseases reflects the most recent innovations in anti-viral vaccines and drugs. These drugs play crucial roles in the fight against many hitherto incurable diseases, the causes, pathophysiologies, and molecular processes of which remain unknown. Targeted liver drug delivery systems are in clinical trials. The receptor-mediated endocytosis approach involving the abundant asialoglycoprotein receptors (ASGPRs) on the surfaces of liver cells show great promise. We here review N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc)-siRNA conjugates that treat viral diseases such as hepatitis B infection, but we also mention that novel, native conjugate-based, targeted siRNA anti-viral drugs may also cure several life-threatening diseases such as hemorrhagic cystitis, multifocal leukoencephalopathy, and severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by coronaviruses and human herpes virus.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GalNac conjugate; Hepatitis B; Hepatocytes; SiRNA; Virus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34474100      PMCID: PMC8405237          DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2021.105864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacol Res        ISSN: 1043-6618            Impact factor:   7.658


Introduction

RNA molecular biology has become a prominent feature of medical research in recent years. Genome functional analysis, RNA processing and stability screening, transcriptional assays, and translational biology, virology, and cancer approaches exploit small (15–20 nucleotide) non-coding RNAs that regulate the expression of entire genomes [1]. These RNAs are subdivided by their biological roles or origins; short interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) play unique and important roles in RNA interference mechanism (RNAi) pathways [2], [3], [4], activated when cells encounter a double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) that is often a sign of (possibly fatal) infection [5]. We evaluate the anti-viral efficacies reported in clinical trials of N-acetylgalactosamine (GalNAc)-based siRNA treatments for several viral diseases including Hepatitis B. It is hoped that several targeting drug delivery systems will become available in the next few years.

RNAi mechanism

The RNAi mechanism was initially discovered as a form of miRNA-mediated silencing of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome [6]. A trigger RNA termed a long dsRNA or an miRNA primary transcript is cleaved and processed (by the RNase III enzymes Dicer and Drosha) into siRNAs with two-to-four-nucleotide overhangs on the 3′-ends of each strand [7], [8] ( Fig. 1). Then, the siRNAs are embedded in an effector complex termed the RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) within which the siRNAs are matched via their stable 5′-ends, and then hybridize with the target mRNA sequence guided by the catalytic RISC protein, a member of the argonaut family (Ago2); ATP-dependent mRNA cleavage follows [9], [10], [11], [12].
Fig. 1

RNA interference mechanism via siRNA pathway – Diagrammatic representation of the RNAi mechanism within the host cell, via externally delivered siRNA complexes designed in order to knock-down the target gene, thereby leading to gene silencing.

RNA interference mechanism via siRNA pathway – Diagrammatic representation of the RNAi mechanism within the host cell, via externally delivered siRNA complexes designed in order to knock-down the target gene, thereby leading to gene silencing. Each siRNA is associated with an Ago2-family protein to form a sequence- specific gene-silencing ribonucleoprotein exhibiting specific base-pairing between the small (guide) RNA and its target mRNA sequence [13]. Recent studies on the molecular impacts of endogenous RNAi mechanisms have paved the way for use of siRNAs as nucleic acid medicines for several incurable diseases [14], [15], [16], [17]. Gene-targeting studies involving novel siRNAs have reduced immune activity after organ transfer and off-target serum stability and increased siRNA potency [18], [19]; it is possible to selectively control certain genes expressed in patients with serious genetic or viral diseases [20]. However, effective delivery of therapeutic siRNAs to target tissues remains challenging. Systemically injected nucleic acids must resist nuclease degradation in extracellular spaces, bypass renal clearance, evade sequestration by plasma proteins, avoid removal by the reticuloendothelial system, cross the capillary endothelium of the desired target cells via a paracellular or transcellular route, traverse the plasma membrane, escape the endolysosomal system prior to lysosomal degradation or re-export via exocytosis, and attain the required intracellular site of action. To date, most oligonucleotide therapeutics have focused on either local or liver delivery [21], [22], [23], [24].

Viruses

The virosphere is continuing to expand rapidly; new viruses are identified every year [25], [26]. The genetic-based classification of human virions is shown in Table 1. Although viral protein structures and associations are rather well-known, the effects of the environment and host replicative properties on viral infections remain poorly understood, as do the maintenance of protein structure and function over the course of evolution [28], [29], [30], [31], [32]. This convergent evolution of gene transfer has played key roles in distributing certain protein folding patterns throughout the orders of the phylogenetic tree, establishing pathologically distinct viruses. Viral pathogens have caused successive pandemics ( Table 2) [29], [33], [34], SARS CoV-2 is an excellent example [46]. The RNAi mechanism giving rise to antiviral siRNAs was first discovered using the single-stranded negative-sense RNA respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), a human pneumovirus causing respiratory tract infections [47]. Great efforts were then made to develop siRNA-based viral vaccines against DNA and RNA viruses [48], [49], [50], [51].
Table 1

Classification of virus based on their genetic integrity for human specific virions [27].

TypeOrder/class/familyFamily/subfamilyGeneraSpeciesProminently disease-causing genusViral sp.DiseaseHost
ssDNA
1.ParvoviridaeDensovirinae817Insects, shrimps and chordates
Hamaparvovirinae513
Parvovirinae10> 50ErythroparvivirusErythrovirus B19Erythema infectiosumPrimates
DependoparvovirusAdeno-associated dependoparvovirus A 2 (AAV2)Defective virusesAffects humans and other primates with the help of a helper virus
2.Circoviridae2> 50CircovirusPorcine circovirusPost weaning multi systemic wasting syndromePigs
CyclovirusHuman associated cyclovirusRespiratory and neurological infections in humansMammals, birds and insects
3.Anelloviridae14> 50Alpha, Beta, Gamma and the tatorquevirusTorquevirusMay be associated with hepatitis, pulmonary diseases, hematologic disorders, myopathy and lupusHumans and other primates



dsDNA
4.PapovaviricetesPapillomaviridae52> 50First papillomavirinae> 100 sp.HPV – 1Humans
Second papillomavirinae
Polyomaviridae4> 50Alpha, beta, delta and gamma polyomavirusesBK, JC and SV40 virusesHemorrhagic cystitis, multifocal leukoencephalopathyAves, humans and other primates
5.RowaviralesAdenoviridae5> 50Mastadeno virusHuman adenovirus SerotypesMild respiratory, gastrointestinal and eye infectionsHumans, mammals
6.HerpesviralesAlloHerpesviridae413
Herpesviridae13> 50BetaherpesvirinaeCytomegalovirus,Roseolo virusHHV5,HHV6Human, monkeys
MalacoHerpesviridae22
7.PoxviridaeChordopoxvirinae18> 50OrthopoxvirusVaccinia virus,Variola virusSmallpox, Respiratory diseases and Skin lesionsHuman, mammals
Eentamopoxvirinae4> 50Insects



RT Viruses
8.Hepadnaviridae518OrthohepadnavirusHepatitis B virusHepatitis, Hepatocellular carcinomaHuman, Mammals
9.RetroviridaeOrthoretroviridae649Lentivirus, aplpharetrovirus, deltaretrovirusHuman immunodeficiency virus 1 and 2, Avian leukosis virus,Bovine leukemia virusAIDS, Malignancies,Vertebrates
Spumaretrovirinae519SimiispumavirusSimian foamy virusLife-long persistent infectionsHumans and mammals



dsRNA
10.ReoviridaeSpinareovirinae9> 50OrthoreovirusMammalian orthoreovirusRespiratory tract disease, gastroenteritis, biliary atresiaMammals



ssRNA
11.CoronaviridaeLetovirinae11
Orthocoronavirinae4> 50Alphacoronavirus, BetacoronavirusGammacoronavirus, DeltacoronavirusCoV StrainsMainly respiratory diseases (pneumonia) and gastroenteritisVertebrates
12.PicornaviralesPicornaviridae63> 50EnterovirusesPoliovirusParalysis (non-polio, polio-type)Human and Mammals
AphthovirusesFoot-and-mouth disease virusHand-foot-and-mouth diseaseMammals
13.ArticulaviralesOrthomyxoviridae79Influenza A virusH1N1Acute febrile respiratory tract infectionAquatic birds, Human, Pig, Horse, Seals
14.BunyaviralesHantaviridae745HantaanorthohantavirusHantavirushemorrhagic fever, renal syndrome,pulmonary syndromeHumans and rodents
15.MononegaviralesParamyxoviridae14> 50RubulavirusMeasles morbillivirus,Mumps rubulavirusMeasles and mumpsHumans, Apes, Pigs, Dogs
Rhabdoviridae30> 50LyssavirusRabies lyssavirusFatal encephalitisHumans and mammals
Pneumoviridae25Metapneumovirus,OrthopneumovirusHuman respiratory syncytial virusRespiratory tract diseasesHuman, cattle, rodents, birds
Filoviridae611EbolavirusZaire ebolavirusHemorragic feverBats, Humans, primates
16.UnassignedDeltavirus11Hepatitis delta virusHDVHepatitisHuman, snakes, Birds
Table 2

The major virus-based flu pandemics and their impact on history.

Name of the pandemicYearDeathsFirst outbreakVirus or SerotypeRefs.
Spanish Flu1918–192020–50 millionUnited States in 1918Influenza[35]
Asian Flu1957–19582 millionChina in 1956H2N2 subtype of the Influenza A virus[36]
Hon-Kong Flu1968–19691 millionHong Kong in 1968H3N2 strain of the Influenza A virus[37]
Russian Flu1977–19781.5 millionNorthern China in 1977Influenza A virus - H1N1 strain[38]
Asiatic flu1989–19921 millionBukhara of the Russian Empire in 1989H3N8 strain of the Influenza A virus subtype H2N2[39]
SARS CoV2002–2004> 1000Guangdong province of southern China in 2002SARS coronavirus of the CoV Strains[40]
HIV/AIDS Pandemic2001–201236 millionDemocratic Republic of the Congo in 1976HIV[41]
Swine Flu2009–201012,469United States in 2009H1N1 influenza virus[42]
Ebola outbreak2018–2020> 29,000North Kivu ProvinceZaire ebolavirus[43]
SARS CoV 2/nCoV2019847,986Wuhan, Hubei Province, China in 2020Respiratory Syncytial Virus- Coronavirus[44]
Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus outbreak20202562 with 881 associatedSaudi Arabia in 2020MERS CoV of the CoV Strains[45]
Classification of virus based on their genetic integrity for human specific virions [27]. The major virus-based flu pandemics and their impact on history.

Role of siRNAs in viral disease

siRNAs can be delivered to cells by viral and non-viral vectors. Synthetic siRNAs against the Influenza-A virus, incorporated in a lentiviral vector and driven by the polymerase U6 promotor, exhibited preventive and therapeutic effects when given intranasally to mice [52], [53], [54]. A synthetic siRNA against the coxsackievirus delivered to HeLA cells via oligofectamine-mediated transfection reduced viral replication [55], [56]. siRNAs developed against CoV-SARS (pSUPER and pSilent1-U6) transfected to cells with the aid of lipofectamine inhibited N gene expression; similarly, siRNA Pbs/U6 given intratracheally to mice reduced viral replication [57], [58]. A synthetic siRNA against the same RNA virus given intranasally to monkeys reduced infection and symptoms [59], [60]. Similarly, a Pcdna3/U6 siRNA against the food-and-mouth-disease virus (FMDV) transfected into BHK21 cells using lipofectamine inhibited viral protein 1 expression and reduced viral replication [61], [62]. In terms of DNA viruses, synthetic siRNAs against human papilloma virus (HPV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) reduced viral numbers and inhibited S protein production in several in vitro studies using differentiating keratinocytes. Fugene compounds in HPV were targeting lipofectamine-transfected at short time intervals into Hep-G2 cells and ameliorated the effects of viral infection [63], [64], [65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70], [71]. Chemically modified siRNAs targeting the Zaire ebolavirus (ZEBOV) prevented the synthesis of the viral polymerase, and proteins 24 and 35, in rhesus macaques [49]. TKM-100201 and TKM-130803 siRNAs against ZEBOV target the mRNAs encoding the polymerase-L membrane-associated viral protein 24 and the polymerase cofactor of viral protein 35 specific to the West African Makona strains when delivered via nanoparticles. However, the Phase II clinical trial results were poor, and the trial was terminated early [72], [73]. The FDA-approved (in 2028 and 2019) nucleic acid therapeutics based on antisense oligonucleotides include pegaptanib, mipomersen, eteplirsen, defibrotide, nusinersen, inotersen, patisiran, and givosiran [35], [72].

GalNAc-siRNA conjugates: a leading way for siRNA based antiviral therapeutics

siRNA-based treatments may be very valuable, but delivery remains problematic. Injected siRNAs may be degraded by nucleases in plasma, immune cells, and the kidney [74], [75], [76], [77], [78], greatly reducing the half-lives. Free siRNA does not readily cross cell membranes, given its negative charge and high molecular weight [79]. Occasionally, siRNAs may trigger non-specific side-effects. Nano-carriers and endosome-based delivery systems have been developed. Also, siRNAs have been modified via addition or removal of sugars, bases, or overhangs, and substitution of uridine residues [80], [81], [82]. GalNAc-siRNA conjugate is a trimer that binds firmly to a major hepatocellular protein, the asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR) [83]. Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry was used to assess the chemical integrities of GalNAc-siRNA conjugates. In preclinical studies, these conjugates successfully entered the livers of both rodents and nonhuman primates and are now the subjects of several clinical trials ( Table 3) [84]. Effects are evident when the trimer level exceeds 6 μg/mg ASGPR.
Table 3

GalNAc–siRNA conjugate based clinical studies, their targets, action and other details.

DrugConditionTargetDelivery/ModePhaseStatusSponsorsPatents IDRefs.
ARC-520Chronic HBV infectionSurface proteinsIntravenous injectionsIITerminatedArrowhead PharmaceuticalsNCT02452528NCT01872065NCT02604212[85]
HBV infectionSurface proteinssubcutaneouslyIITerminatedArrowhead PharmaceuticalsNCT02577029NCT02065336 NCT02604199[85]
ARC-521HBV infectionViral DNAsubcutaneouslyITerminatedAlnylam PharmaceuticalsNCT02797522[85]
DCR-HBVSHepatitis BHBV geneGalNAc–siRNA conjugateI/IIDicerna PharmaceuticalsNCT03772249[85]
ALN-HBV02 (VIR-2218)Hepatitis BHBV geneGalNAc–siRNAconjugateI/IIAlnylam PharmaceuticalsNCT03672188NCT02826018[85]
AB-729Hepatitis BHBV geneGalNAc–siRNA conjugatePreclinicalArbutus BiopharmaCorporation[86]
RBD1016Hepatitis BHBV geneGalNAc–siRNA conjugatePreclinicalSuzhou Ribo Life ScienceCo., Ltd[86]
JNJ-3989(ARO-HBV)Hepatitis BHNV viral proteinsGalNAc–siRNA conjugateIICompleted/ TerminatedArrowhead/JNJNCT03365947 NCT03982186 NCT04129554[85]
ARB-1467Hepatitis BHBV geneLNPIIaCompletedArbutus BiopharmaCorporationNCT02631096[85]
TKM-130803Ebola virus diseaseViral proteinsIntravenous infusionIITerminatedArbutus BiopharmaPACTR201501000997429[73]
TKM-100201(TKM-EBOV-001)Ebola virus diseaseViral proteinsIntravenous infusionITerminatedArbutus Biopharma CorporationNCT01518881[85]
GalNAc–siRNA conjugate based clinical studies, their targets, action and other details. The liver constitutes one-third of the total reticuloendothelial mass of the human body, playing major roles in defense against a wide range of microorganisms [87]. Liver integrity is compromised by microbial pathogens that cause acute liver failure, hepatic fibrosis, and cirrhosis [88]. Hepatitis B is one such pathogen [89], [90]. It was earlier considered that the infection was incurable, but it can now be eradicated using nuclear-based anti‐viral drugs (NUCs) including lamivudine, telbivudine, adefovir, entecavir (ETV), tenofovirdisoproxil (TDF), and tenofoviralafenamide (TAF) [91], [92], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97]. RNAi-based drugs may treat several severe viral infections (including EBOLA infections) for which effective drugs and vaccines are lacking. GalNAc-siRNA conjugates bind to the approximately 106 ASGPR molecules on the sinusoidal cellular membrane of a hepatocyte. The conjugates are then endocytosed and accumulate in clathrin-coated pits [98]. When the pH falls, the conjugates are released into the cellular lumen and return to the cell surface [84]. Soon thereafter, the sialyl-GalNAc linkers are removed from siRNA, triggering transactivation of the RNA-binding protein and RNAi activity within cells ( Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

GalNac-siRNA conjugate mediated gene silencing 1. The GalNac-siRNA binds to the ASGPR receptor molecule seen on the surface of the hepatocyte cellular membrane region firmly and enters the hepatocyte via the 2. endosome transfer by a process known as the endocytosis 3. The sialyl-GalNAc linkers are degraded from the siRNA molecule and are transferred into the nucleus thereby provoking desired alterations in the target gene site. 4. The altered gene expression is then processed through the process of translation and the 5. target protein is achieved successfully. 6. The free ASGPR receptor molecules are then recycled back to their original form and replaced in the 7. Cellular membrane surface for further functions to be carried out.

GalNac-siRNA conjugate mediated gene silencing 1. The GalNac-siRNA binds to the ASGPR receptor molecule seen on the surface of the hepatocyte cellular membrane region firmly and enters the hepatocyte via the 2. endosome transfer by a process known as the endocytosis 3. The sialyl-GalNAc linkers are degraded from the siRNA molecule and are transferred into the nucleus thereby provoking desired alterations in the target gene site. 4. The altered gene expression is then processed through the process of translation and the 5. target protein is achieved successfully. 6. The free ASGPR receptor molecules are then recycled back to their original form and replaced in the 7. Cellular membrane surface for further functions to be carried out. The first-generation drugs (the two synthetic siRNAs of ARC-520) [99] were delivered as GalNAc conjugates to patients with chronic HBV infection; the preclinical study of Arrowhead Pharmaceuticals is now entering the clinical phase. ARC-520 was well-tolerated in healthy volunteers (trials NCT02452528, NCT01872065, and NCT02604212) [100]. The drug targets the common regions at the 3′ UTR ends of HBV transcripts from episomal DNA; the drug is linked to a dynamic poly-conjugate (DPC) that facilitates cellular uptake by protecting it from degradation when given intravenously [101], [102]. The phase II trials (nos. NCT02577029, NCT02065336, and NCT02604199) revealed reduced HBsAg expression in patients taking nucleotide analogs [103], [104]. The second-generation ARC-521 reduced the expression of HBsAg and viral DNA in a phase I trial (NCT02797522) [105]. Unfortunately, the trial was discontinued after lethal toxicity developed in non-human primates. Further studies showed that a GalNac-conjugated siRNA targeting all HBV transcripts (JNJ-3989, formerly ARO-HBV) after subcutaneous administration exhibited fewer side-effects (trials NCT03982186, NCT04129554, and NCT03365947) [106], [107]. The next-generation hepatitis B treatment uses a mouse adeno-associated virus (AAV)- LNA ASO-GalNAc conjugate; this reduces the level of membrane surface HBsAg to the lowest value found to date [108]. GalNAc-conjugated siRNAs targeting Epstein-Barr virus, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus, parvovirus, adenovirus, and SARS-associated coronaviruses have been reported, but have not yet been tested in the SARS CoV-2 context [109], [110], [111]. GalNAc-siRNA conjugates are simpler, smaller, and more defined than the LNP formulations. GalNAc-siRNA is synthesized using a solid-state method and chemically defined via MS [112]. Initially a neoglycopeptide (ah-GalNAc)3 was used to target a ligand composed of short, neutral, methyl phosphonate 8-mer oligonucleotides [113]. The linker length and sugar were then optimized, and a refined tris-galactoside structure used to deliver lipids and ASOs [114]. Recently, sequential conjugation of GalNAc residues via nucleosidic linkages has increased drug potencies [115], enhancing hepatocyte oligonucleotide delivery to ∼ 10-fold that of free systems in preclinical models [116]. Recent clinical trials using GalNAc-siRNA conjugates have been performed by Alnylam, Arrowhead, and Dicerna Pharmaceuticals. Alnylam is evaluating six GalNAc-siRNA conjugates in three phase III trials that widely target liver diseases. The first clinical trial evaluated revusiran (ALN-TTRsc) that targets the transthyretin (TTR) protein in an effort to treat TTR-mediated amyloidosis (trial nos. D2, D1–64, D1–65).

Conclusion

siRNAs that target key signaling genes may not only improve drug efficiencies but also enhance drug uptake and distribution by the native receptors based therapeutic approaches at cellular levels influencing chemical modifications in delivery mechanisms. We have reviewed the role played by GalNAc conjugates in oligonucleotide-based therapeutic approaches that exhibit great potential in targeted drug delivery system. Recently, ASO conjugated to 5′ nucleic acids has been shown to be maximally amenable to solid-phase synthesis, and to target hepatocytes more effectively, being tested against various disease conditions and more novel drugs based on native cell and tissue specific conjugates are yet to come in the future. These challenges serve to be the major achievements of pharmaceutical industries in the upcoming era.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Arun Meyyazhaganf: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Coordinated the working group. Shanmughavel Piramanayagama: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing. Balamuralikrishnan Balasubramanianb: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Selected bibliographic sources, Coordinated the working group, Writing – review & editing. Lokesh Thangamania: Writing – original draft. Karthika Pushparaje: Selected bibliographic sources, Figures. Murugesh Easwaranc: Selected bibliographic sources, Writing – review & editing. Jeyakumar Natarajand: Selected bibliographic sources, Writing – review & editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
  3 in total

Review 1.  RNA Therapeutic Options to Manage Aberrant Signaling Pathways in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Dream or Reality?

Authors:  Kurt Sartorius; Samuel O Antwi; Anil Chuturgoon; Lewis R Roberts; Anna Kramvis
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 2.  Chemistries and applications of DNA-natural product conjugate.

Authors:  Yuanyuan Chen; Wenting Li; Hang Xing
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 5.545

Review 3.  Noncoding RNAs Emerging as Drugs or Drug Targets: Their Chemical Modification, Bio-Conjugation and Intracellular Regulation.

Authors:  Jin Wang; Tian Tian; Xin Li; Yan Zhang
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-10-09       Impact factor: 4.927

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.