| Literature DB >> 32316511 |
Luwei Nie1,2, Daniel Berckmans3, Chaoyuan Wang1,2, Baoming Li1,2.
Abstract
For all homoeothermic living organisms, heart rate (HR) is a core variable to control the metabolic energy production in the body, which is crucial to realize essential bodily functions. Consequently, HR monitoring is becoming increasingly important in research of farm animals, not only for production efficiency, but also for animal welfare. Real-time HR monitoring for humans has become feasible though there are still shortcomings for continuously accurate measuring. This paper is an effort to estimate whether it is realistic to get a continuous HR sensor for livestock that can be used for long term monitoring. The review provides the reported techniques to monitor HR of living organisms by emphasizing their principles, advantages, and drawbacks. Various properties and capabilities of these techniques are compared to check the potential to transfer the mostly adequate sensor technology of humans to livestock in term of application. Based upon this review, we conclude that the photoplethysmographic (PPG) technique seems feasible for implementation in livestock. Therefore, we present the contributions to overcome challenges to evolve to better solutions. Our study indicates that it is realistic today to develop a PPG sensor able to be integrated into an ear tag for mid-sized and larger farm animals for continuously and accurately monitoring their HRs.Entities:
Keywords: electrocardiography (ECG); heart rate monitoring; livestock; photoplethysmographic imaging (PPGI); photoplethysmography (PPG); precision livestock farming (PLF)
Year: 2020 PMID: 32316511 PMCID: PMC7219037 DOI: 10.3390/s20082291
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Overview of physiological effects and respective techniques for heart rate (HR) measurement.
Summary of electrocardiography (ECG)-based techniques for HR monitoring.
| Citation | Technique | Implementation | Movement | Power Consumption | Quantitative Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wu and Zhang [ | CCECG | Integrated into a bedsheet | Sleep | NA | Root mean square error (RMSE): 0.66 ± 0.57 bpm |
| Gargiulo et al. [ | Dry electrodes | Integrated into a chest strap | Exercise | 33 mA (including transmission) | Correlation: larger than 0.96 |
| Nemati et al. [ | CCECG | Integrated into a stretchable cloth | Motionless | less than 25 mA | NA |
| Chen et al. [ | Flexible dry electrodes | Integrated into a wrist band | NA | 84.83 mW | NA |
| Rawstorn et al. [ | CCECG | Integrated into a harness (chest strap) | Exercise | NA | Mean bias: |
| Dai et al. [ | Flexible dry electrodes | Integrated into a garment | Sitting | 29.74 mW | Accuracy: 98.55% |
| Dionisi et al. [ | CCECG | Integrated into a T-shirt | Walking | 17 mW (flexible solar panel) | Mean bias: 0.38 bpm |
| Zheng et al. [ | CCECG | Integrated into chest strap | Exercise | 2.1 mA | Mean bias: 0.60 ± 1.48 bpm |
| Li and Kim [ | Dry electrodes | Integrated into a patch | Exercise | NA | Error rate: within 2% |
NA: not available. Movement: movement status of the subjects when HR measuring.
Summary of finger-type photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors for HR monitoring.
| Citation | Mode | Light Wavelength | Movement | Power Consumption | Quantitative Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rhee et al. [ | Reflection | Red and Infrared | Shaking finger | Total current consumption: 0.491 mA; | RMSE: 1.23 bpm |
| Maria Lopez-Silva et al. [ | Transmission | Near infrared (850 nm) | Exercise | NA | |
| Park et al. [ | Reflection | Red and Infrared | Motionless | Transmit mode: 31 mA; Receiving mode: 26 mA | NA |
| Yousefi et al. [ | Transmission | Red (660 nm) and Infrared (895 nm) | Exercise | NA |
NA: not available. Movement: movement status of the subjects when HR measuring.
Summary of ear-worn and patch PPG sensors for HR monitoring.
| Citation | Sensor | Mode | Light Wavelength | Movement | Quantitative Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wang and Zheng [ | Ear-worn | Reflection | Infrared | Motionless | RMSE: 1.3 bpm |
| Shin et al. [ | Transmission | Infrared (940 nm) | Exercise | Error rates: | |
| Poh et al. [ | Reflection | Infrared (940 nm) | Exercise | Stand: | |
| Poh et al. [ | Reflection | Infrared | Exercise | Stand: | |
| Leboeuf et al. [ | Reflection | Infrared | Exercise | ||
| Alzahrani et al. [ | Patch | Reflection | Green (525 nm) | Exercise |
NA: not available. Movement: movement status of the subjects when HR measuring.
Summary of wrist-type PPG techniques for HR monitoring, part 1.
| Method and | Signal Processing Techniques | Error 1 (Mean ± SD) (bpm) | Error 2 | Bland-Altman Analysis | Pearson Correlation Coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPECTRAP | Spectrum subtraction based on asymmetric least squares | 1.50 ± 1.95 | 1.12 ± 1.47 | LOA: | 0.995 |
| TROIKA | Sparse signal reconstruction: single measurement vector (SMV) | 2.34 ± 0.82 | 1.80 | 0.992 | |
| JOSS | Joint sparse spectrum reconstruction: multiple measurement vector (MMV) | 1.28 ± 2.61 | 1.01 ± 2.29 | LOA: [−5.94, 5.41] | 0.993 |
| MICROST | Wavelet and time-domain methods | 2.58 ± 2.70 | 1.85 | 0.988 | |
| SpaMA | Time-varying spectral filtering algorithm | 0.89 ± 0.6 | 0.65 ± 0.4 | NA | 0.98 |
| IMAT | Sparse reconstruction: iterative method with adaptive thresholding | 1.25 | NA | NA | NA |
NA: not available.
Summary of wrist-type PPG techniques for HR monitoring, part 2.
| Method and Citation | Signal Processing Techniques | Error 1 (Mean ± SD) (bpm) | Error 2 | Bland-Altman Analysis | Pearson Correlation Coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FEEMD | Fast ensemble empirical mode decomposition (FEEMD) and spectrum subtraction | 1.83 ± 1.21 | 1.4 | 0.989 | |
| MC-SMD | Multi-channel spectral matrix decomposition (MC-SMD) model | 1.11 | 0.80 | 0.9968 | |
| EEMD | Ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) | 1.02 ± 1.79 | 0.79 | LOA: [−4.10, 3.98] | 0.996 |
| Mix-SVM | Principle component analysis (PCA) and adaptive filter | 1.01 | 0.72 | LOA: [−3.46, 3.83] | 0.9972 |
| WFPV | Wiener filter and phase vocoder | 1.02 | 0.81 | NA | 0.997 |
| MURAD | Multiple reference RLS adaptive noise cancellation | 0.9726 ± 1.831 | 0.76 ± 1.5 | LOA: [−3.5665, 3.6112] | 0.9972 |
NA: not available.
Summary of photoplethysmographic imaging (PPGI) techniques for HR monitoring, part 1.
| Citation | Sensor | Illumination | Distance (m) | Movement | Signal Processing Technique | RMSE (bpm) | Bland-Altman Analysis (bpm) | Pearson Correlation Coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poh et al. [ | Webcam | Ambient light | 0.5 | Slight motion (sitting) | Independent component analysis (ICA) | Sitting still: 2.29 | Sitting sill: | Sitting still: 0.98 |
| Poh et al. [ | Webcam | Ambient light | 0.5 | Motionless | ICA | 1.24 | NA | 1 |
| Sun et al. [ | Monochrome CMOS camera | IR (870 nm) | 0.4 | Motionless | Planar motion compensation and blind source separation | NA | μ: 0.33 | |
| de Haan and Jeanne [ | CCD camera | Ambient light | NA | Cycling | Chrominance-based methods | 0.4 | NA | 1 |
| Holton et al. [ | Webcam | Ambient light | 0.6 | Motionless | ICA | 6.92 | Standard error: 6.51 bpm | 0.89 |
NA: not available. Movement: movement status of the subjects when HR measuring.
Summary of PPGI techniques for HR monitoring, part 2.
| Citation | Sensor | Illumination | Distance (m) | Movement | Signal Processing Technique | RMSE (bpm) | Bland-Altman Analysis (bpm) | Pearson Correlation Coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bousefsaf et al. [ | Webcam | Ambient light | 1 | Head movements | Continuous wavelet filtering | 2.33 ± 0.73 | μ: 0.02 | 0.853 ± 0.056 |
| Monkaresi et al. [ | Webcam | Ambient light | NA | Cycling | Machine learning approach | 4.33 | μ: −0.28 | 0.97 |
| Veeraraghavan et al. [ | Camera | Ambient light | 0.5 | Facial movements | Combining skin-color change signals from different facial regions using a weighted average | NA | μ: 0.48 | NA |
| Yu et al. [ | Camera | Ambient light | 0.6 | Cycling | ICA | 1.97 | NA | 0.99 |
| Amelard et al. [ | Monochrome camera | NIR | 1.5 | Supine position | Spectral-spatial fusion model | NA | µ: −1.0 | 0.9952 |
NA: not available. Movement: movement status of the subjects when HR measuring.
Summary of PPGI techniques for HR monitoring, part 3.
| Citation | Sensor | Illumination | Distance (m) | Movement | Signal Processing Technique | RMSE (bpm) | Bland-Altman Analysis | Pearson Correlation Coefficient |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cheng et al. [ | Webcam | Ambient light | 0.5 | Motionless | Joint blind source separation and ensemble empirical mode decomposition (JBSS–EEMD) | NA | μ: 1.15 | 0.53 |
| Qi et al. [ | Webcam | Ambient light | NA | Motionless | Joint blind source separation | 5.0017 | NA | 0.7423 |
| Bousefsaf et al. [ | Webcam | Ambient light | 1 | Motionless | Segmentation based on lightness criteria | 4.81 | μ: 0.16 | 0.78 |
| Tayibnapis et al. [ | Webcam | Ambient light | 0.3–1.1 | Motionless | singular value Decomposition and Burg algorithm | 3.34 | μ: 2.15 | 0.73 |
| Ling et al. [ | Camera | Ambient light | 0.6 | Cycling | Canonical component analysis | Experiment 1: 3.70 | NA | Experiment 1: 0.97 |
NA: not available. Movement: movement status of the subjects when HR measuring.
Summary of Ballistocardiography (BCG) and Seismocardiography (SCG) measurements for HR monitoring.
| Citation | Sensor | Movement | Quantitative Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wang et al. [ | Pressure sensor | NA | Accuracy: 98.22% |
| Aubert and Brauers [ | Electromechanical film sensors | Supine | Error: 1.25 bpm |
| Paalasmaa et al. [ | Flexible piezoelectric film | Sleep | Mean absolute error: 0.78 bpm |
| Park et al. [ | Piezoelectric film | Motionless | Standard deviation: 1.82 bpm |
| Bruser et al. [ | Strain gauge | NA | Mean error: 0.39 bpm |
| Bruser et al. [ | Strain gauge | Supine | Mean error: 0.46 bpm (10 s); 0.5 bpm (30 s) |
| Hernandez et al. [ | Accelerometer, gyroscope, camera | Motionless | (gyroscope) Mean absolute error: 0.83 bpm |
| Tadi et al. [ | Accelerometer | Supine | Average RMSE error: 0.33 bpm (supine); 0.62 bpm (right lateral); 0.45 bpm (left lateral) |
NA: not available. Movement: movement status of the subjects when HR measuring.
Summary of Doppler radar and laser measurements for HR monitoring.
| Method | Device/Sensor | Distance (m) | Movement | Quantitative Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xiao et al. [ | Ka-band Doppler radar | 2 | Motionless | Accuracy: 0.5 m, 100%; 1 m, 96%; 1.5 m, 89.3%; 2 m, 81.5%; 2.5 m, 64.6% |
| Xiao et al. [ | 2.8 | Motionless | Accuracy: 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.8 m: 98.82%, 91.71%, 92.40%, 85.78%, 81.35% | |
| Li et al. [ | 0.5–2.5 | Motionless | Accuracy: 0.5 m, 1 m, 1.5 m, 2 m, 2.5 m: 99.1%, 89.8%, 98.9%, 85.2%, 83.3% (front); 96.3%, 89.8%, 89%, 80.5%, 85.7% (left); 100%, 93.2%, 93.8%, 97.4%, 85.1% (right); 97.6%, 100%, 94.3%, 93.6%, 85.5% (back) | |
| Tavakolian et al. [ | Doppler radar | 0.1 | Motionless | Accuracy: 92.9% |
| Obeid et al. [ | NA | Motionless | Relative error: 0.5–1.5% | |
| Morbiducci et al. [ | Laser Doppler vibrometer | 1.5 | Motionless | Bias: 0.006 bpm (male);0.015 bpm (female) |
| Scalise and Morbiducci [ | 1.5 | Motionless | Mean bias: 0.026 bpm |
NA: not available. Movement: movement status of the subjects when HR measuring.
Comparison of different HR monitoring techniques.
| Technique | Measuring Sensor | Distance | Movement | Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PPG | Phototransistor | mm | Exercise | low |
| PPGI | Camera/webcam | m | Motionless | low |
| Thermal imaging | Thermal imaging camera | m | Motionless | highest |
| BCG/SCG | Pressure sensor, strain gauge, optical sensor, etc. | mm | Motionless | low |
| Video-based motion | Camera/webcam | m | Motionless | low |
| Radar | Microwave sensor | m | Motionless | medium |
| Laser | Laser | m | Motionless | high |
| Wet ECG | Wet electrodes | 0 | Subtle Motion | medium |
| Dry ECG | Dry electrodes | 0 | Exercise | medium |
| CCECG | Capacitively coupled electrodes | mm | Exercise | medium |
| Impedance | Coils/electrodes | cm | Motionless | medium |