Literature DB >> 24743110

Earbud-based sensor for the assessment of energy expenditure, HR, and VO2max.

Steven Francis Leboeuf1, Michael E Aumer, William E Kraus, Johanna L Johnson, Brian Duscha.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION/
PURPOSE: The goal of this program was to determine the feasibility of a novel noninvasive, highly miniaturized optomechanical earbud sensor for accurately estimating total energy expenditure (TEE) and maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max). The optomechanical sensor module, small enough to fit inside commercial audio earbuds, was previously developed to provide a seamless way to measure blood flow information during daily life activities. The sensor module was configured to continuously measure physiological information via photoplethysmography and physical activity information via accelerometry. This information was digitized and sent to a microprocessor where digital signal-processing algorithms extract physiological metrics in real time. These metrics were streamed wirelessly from the earbud to a computer.
METHODS: In this study, 23 subjects of multiple physical habitus were divided into a training group of 14 subjects and a validation group of 9 subjects. Each subject underwent the same exercise measurement protocol consisting of treadmill-based cardiopulmonary exercise testing to reach VO2max. Benchmark sensors included a 12-lead ECG sensor for measuring HR, a calibrated treadmill for measuring distance and speed, and a gas-exchange analysis instrument for measuring TEE and VO2max. The earbud sensor was the device under test. Benchmark and device under test data collected from the 14-person training data set study were integrated into a preconceived statistical model for correlating benchmark data with earbud sensor data. Coefficients were optimized, and the optimized model was validated in the 9-person validation data set.
RESULTS: It was observed that the earbud sensor estimated TEE and VO2max with mean ± SD percent estimation errors of -0.7 ± 7.4% and -3.2 ± 7.3%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The earbud sensor can accurately estimate TEE and VO2max during cardiopulmonary exercise testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24743110      PMCID: PMC3996514          DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000183

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  16 in total

1.  The relationship between modifiable health risks and group-level health care expenditures. Health Enhancement Research Organization (HERO) Research Committee.

Authors:  D R Anderson; R W Whitmer; R Z Goetzel; R J Ozminkowski; R L Dunn; J Wasserman; S Serxner
Journal:  Am J Health Promot       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

Review 2.  Mobile monitoring with wearable photoplethysmographic biosensors.

Authors:  H Harry Asada; Phillip Shaltis; Andrew Reisner; Sokwoo Rhee; Reginald C Hutchinson
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  2003 May-Jun

3.  Active noise cancellation using MEMS accelerometers for motion-tolerant wearable bio-sensors.

Authors:  H Harry Asada; Hong-Hui Jiang; Peter Gibbs
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2004

Review 4.  Medicare's search for effective obesity treatments: diets are not the answer.

Authors:  Traci Mann; A Janet Tomiyama; Erika Westling; Ann-Marie Lew; Barbra Samuels; Jason Chatman
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2007-04

5.  Evaluation of the Omron HJ-720ITC pedometer under free-living conditions.

Authors:  Nathan A Silcott; David R Bassett; Dixie L Thompson; Eugene C Fitzhugh; Jeremy A Steeves
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  An equation for prediction of energy expenditure of walking and running.

Authors:  W H van der Walt; C H Wyndham
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 3.531

Review 7.  A physiologist's view of running economy.

Authors:  J T Daniels
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  %VO2max versus %HRmax regressions for six modes of exercise.

Authors:  B R Londeree; T R Thomas; G Ziogas; T D Smith; Q Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Hierarchy of individual calibration levels for heart rate and accelerometry to measure physical activity.

Authors:  Søren Brage; Ulf Ekelund; Niels Brage; Mark A Hennings; Karsten Froberg; Paul W Franks; Nicholas J Wareham
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2007-04-26
View more
  7 in total

1.  Estimating Heart Rate, Energy Expenditure, and Physical Performance With a Wrist Photoplethysmographic Device During Running.

Authors:  Jakub Parak; Maria Uuskoski; Jan Machek; Ilkka Korhonen
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2017-07-25       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 2.  Is Continuous Heart Rate Monitoring of Livestock a Dream or Is It Realistic? A Review.

Authors:  Luwei Nie; Daniel Berckmans; Chaoyuan Wang; Baoming Li
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.576

3.  Validity of Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers for Estimating VO2max and Energy Expenditure.

Authors:  Stefanie Passler; Julian Bohrer; Lukas Blöchinger; Veit Senner
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  In-Ear Pulse Rate Measurement: A Valid Alternative to Heart Rate Derived from Electrocardiography?

Authors:  Stefanie Passler; Niklas Müller; Veit Senner
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-08-21       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  Validity and Reliability of Three Commercially Available Smart Sports Bras during Treadmill Walking and Running.

Authors:  James W Navalta; Gabriela Guzman Ramirez; Crystal Maxwell; Kara N Radzak; Graham R McGinnis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Hearables: New Perspectives and Pitfalls of In-Ear Devices for Physiological Monitoring. A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Michela Masè; Alessandro Micarelli; Giacomo Strapazzon
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  The Accuracy and Validity of iOS-Based Heart Rate Apps During Moderate to High Intensity Exercise.

Authors:  Alexa M Bouts; Lauren Brackman; Elizabeth Martin; Adam M Subasic; Edward S Potkanowicz
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2018-01-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.