| Literature DB >> 31546907 |
Abstract
It is widely recognized that nanoscience and nanotechnology and their subfields, such as nanophotonics, nanoelectronics, and nanomechanics, have had a tremendous impact on recent advances in sensing, imaging, and communication, with notable developments, including novel transistors and processor architectures. For example, in addition to being supremely fast, optical and photonic components and devices are capable of operating across multiple orders of magnitude length, power, and spectral scales, encompassing the range from macroscopic device sizes and kW energies to atomic domains and single-photon energies. The extreme versatility of the associated electromagnetic phenomena and applications, both classical and quantum, are therefore highly appealing to the rapidly evolving computing and communication realms, where innovations in both hardware and software are necessary to meet the growing speed and memory requirements. Development of all-optical components, photonic chips, interconnects, and processors will bring the speed of light, photon coherence properties, field confinement and enhancement, information-carrying capacity, and the broad spectrum of light into the high-performance computing, the internet of things, and industries related to cloud, fog, and recently edge computing. Conversely, owing to their extraordinary properties, 0D, 1D, and 2D materials are being explored as a physical basis for the next generation of logic components and processors. Carbon nanotubes, for example, have been recently used to create a new processor beyond proof of principle. These developments, in conjunction with neuromorphic and quantum computing, are envisioned to maintain the growth of computing power beyond the projected plateau for silicon technology. We survey the qualitative figures of merit of technologies of current interest for the next generation computing with an emphasis on edge computing.Entities:
Keywords: carbon nanotubes; edge computing; information technology; nanoscience; neuromorphic computing; photonics; plasmonics; processors; quantum computing; the internet-of-things
Year: 2019 PMID: 31546907 PMCID: PMC6767340 DOI: 10.3390/s19184048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Article statistics showing the histogram of edge computing over publication years, a compilation from [54]. Inset: distribution by discipline [54]. Notable are the intensified research, the multidisciplinary character of the field, and the largest contributing disciplines. The number of other contributing disciplines (not shown) is also increasing rapidly.
Figure 2Some basic elements of a device in the edge computing paradigm. The edge device does not necessarily require a connection with a centralized cloud. Many challenges lie ahead regarding energy efficiency, data quality and reliability, data and device security, computing performance level, etc., stimulating exploration for novel nanosystems and processor architectures, rapid communication, and related components.
Figure 3Multi-tier computing networks. The integration of various technologies to achieve intelligent applications and services.
Figure 4Example of a current paradigm based on cloud computing. Sensors generate raw signals, which are submitted to the cloud directly (route II) or are acquired and observed and then either communicated to the cloud or are evaluated and submitted to the cloud.
Figure 5A simplified edge computing approach. A sensor generates raw data, which is locally processed and evaluated. If the outcome meets certain criteria, the data is then communicated to the cloud for further processing/computing and storage.
Figure 6Envisioning a potential variation of the interconnectivity of edge sensors. The nested growth of edge devices may form a system of a coupled dynamical system with fractal self-similarity. The sensor output S can be processed to H and communicated as N with a final output of f for node i located at R relative to data center O.
Figure 7Comparison of the number of RISC chips (ARM, ARC, Tensilica, or MIPS ISAs) versus CISC architecture (Intel’s 80 × 86). RISC, reduced instruction set computer; CISC, complex instruction set computer; ISA, instruction set architecture; ARM, advanced RISC machine.
Figure 8The process loop for the development of new processors. Examples of computational approaches including DFT (density functional theory), finite elements (FE), finite difference time domain (FDTD), and direct simulation Monte Carlo (DSMC) are given only generically.
Novel nanomaterials and nanostructures of importance in the research and development of the next-generation computing systems.
| Nanosystem | Typical Excitation | Application | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon nanotubes | Electron-hole transport | Transistor channel, cooling, vias, connectors | [ |
| Nanowires and nanoantenna | Plasmons | Interconnect, connector, qubit | [ |
| Quantum dots (doped, undoped Si, GaAs, etc.) | Excitons | Qubit | [ |
| Silicon photonics components | Donor, electron, hole charge and spin states | Transistor material, qubits, quantum computing | [ |
| Nanophotonics components | Photons, polaritons, plasmons | Transistor material, qubits, quantum computing | [ |
| Organic compounds | Charge | Transistor material | [ |
| Nitrogen vacancy | Spin states | Qubits, quantum computing | [ |
| Trapped ions | Qubits, quantum computing | [ | |
| Nano- and micro-electromechanical systems (NEMS and MEMS) | Phonons | Readout | [ |
| Superconductors | Electron | Qubits, quantum computing | [ |
| Metamaterials and metasurfaces | Photons, phonons, plasmons | Transistor material, frequency conversion | [ |
| Topological materials | Photons, phonons, plasmons, electrons | Interconnect, connector, qubit, transistor material | [ |
| Metal-oxide-semiconductor and -metal tunnel junctions | Electron, plasmon, photon | Transistor material | [ |
| Multilayers | Bloch surface waves | Interconnect | [ |