Literature DB >> 30281445

Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of a Reflectance-Based Fiber-Optic Hydrophone: Predictions From Theoretical Models Compared With Measurements.

Keith A Wear, Samuel M Howard.   

Abstract

The goal of this work was to measure the directivity of a reflectance-based fiber-optic hydrophone at multiple frequencies and to compare it to four theoretical models: rigid baffle (RB), rigid piston (RP), unbaffled (UB), and soft baffle (SB). The fiber had a nominal 105- [Formula: see text] diameter core and a 125- [Formula: see text] overall diameter (core + cladding). Directivity measurements were performed at 2.25, 3.5, 5, 7.5, 10, and 15 MHz from ±90° in two orthogonal planes. Effective hydrophone sensitive element radius was estimated by least-squares fitting the four models to the directivity measurements using the sensitive element radius as an adjustable parameter. Over the range from 2.25 to 15 MHz, the average magnitudes of differences between the effective and nominal sensitive element radii were 59% ± 49% (RB), 10% ± 5% (RP), 46% ± 38% (UB), and 71% ± 19% (SB). Therefore, the directivity of a reflectance-based fiber-optic hydrophone may be best estimated by the RP model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30281445      PMCID: PMC6935507          DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2018.2872840

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  31 in total

1.  Hydrophones' effective diameter measurements as a quasi-continuous function of frequency.

Authors:  E G Radulescu; P A Lewin; A Nowicki; W A Berger
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  Cavitation clouds created by shock scattering from bubbles during histotripsy.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Tzu-Yin Wang; Charles A Cain; J Brian Fowlkes; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Michael R Bailey; Zhen Xu
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Acousto-optic, point receiver hydrophone probe for operation up to 100 MHz.

Authors:  P A Lewin; C Mu; S Umchid; A Daryoush; M El-Sherif
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2005-07-05       Impact factor: 2.890

4.  Characterization of a polymer film optical fiber hydrophone for use in the range 1 to 20 MHz: a comparison with PVDF needle and membrane hydrophones.

Authors:  P C Beard; A M Hurrell; T N Mills
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  A Fabry-Perot fiber-optic ultrasonic hydrophone for the simultaneous measurement of temperature and acoustic pressure.

Authors:  Paul Morris; Andrew Hurrell; Adam Shaw; Edward Zhang; Paul Beard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Correction for frequency-dependent hydrophone response to nonlinear pressure waves using complex deconvolution and rarefactional filtering: application with fiber optic hydrophones.

Authors:  Keith Wear; Yunbo Liu; Paul M Gammell; Subha Maruvada; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  A Method for Measuring the Directional Response of Ultrasound Receivers in the Range 0.3-80 MHz Using a Laser-Generated Ultrasound Source.

Authors:  James A Guggenheim; Edward Z Zhang; Paul C Beard
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Cost-effective assembly of a basic fiber-optic hydrophone for measurement of high-amplitude therapeutic ultrasound fields.

Authors:  Jessica E Parsons; Charles A Cain; J Brian Fowlkes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Frequency response of PVDF needle-type hydrophones.

Authors:  B Fay; G Ludwig; C Lankjaer; P A Lewin
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Characterization of a multi-element clinical HIFU system using acoustic holography and nonlinear modeling.

Authors:  Wayne Kreider; Petr V Yuldashev; Oleg A Sapozhnikov; Navid Farr; Ari Partanen; Michael R Bailey; Vera A Khokhlova
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.725

View more
  10 in total

1.  Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part I: Spatiotemporal Transfer Function and Graphical Guide.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part II: Experimental Validation of Spatial Averaging Model.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Yunbo Liu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of Membrane Hydrophones: Theory Versus Experiment.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Christian Baker; Piero Miloro
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.725

4.  Correction for Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circular Sources.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part II: Validation for ARFI and Pulsed Doppler Waveforms.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Aoife M Ivory; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part I: Theory and Impact on Diagnostic Safety Indexes.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Correction for Spatial Averaging Artifacts in Hydrophone Measurements of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound: An Inverse Filter Approach.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Samuel M Howard
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for ARFI Beams from Array Transducers.

Authors:  Keith Wear; Anant Shah; Aoife M Ivory; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Int Ultrason Symp       Date:  2020

9.  Correction for Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circularly-Symmetric Pressure Beams Measured with Membrane Hydrophones.

Authors:  Keith Wear; Anant Shah; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Int Ultrason Symp       Date:  2020

10.  Spatiotemporal Deconvolution of Hydrophone Response for Linear and Nonlinear Beams-Part I: Theory, Spatial-Averaging Correction Formulas, and Criteria for Sensitive Element Size.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.267

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.