Literature DB >> 25585399

Correction for frequency-dependent hydrophone response to nonlinear pressure waves using complex deconvolution and rarefactional filtering: application with fiber optic hydrophones.

Keith Wear, Yunbo Liu, Paul M Gammell, Subha Maruvada, Gerald R Harris.   

Abstract

Nonlinear acoustic signals contain significant energy at many harmonic frequencies. For many applications, the sensitivity (frequency response) of a hydrophone will not be uniform over such a broad spectrum. In a continuation of a previous investigation involving deconvolution methodology, deconvolution (implemented in the frequency domain as an inverse filter computed from frequency-dependent hydrophone sensitivity) was investigated for improvement of accuracy and precision of nonlinear acoustic output measurements. Timedelay spectrometry was used to measure complex sensitivities for 6 fiber-optic hydrophones. The hydrophones were then used to measure a pressure wave with rich harmonic content. Spectral asymmetry between compressional and rarefactional segments was exploited to design filters used in conjunction with deconvolution. Complex deconvolution reduced mean bias (for 6 fiber-optic hydrophones) from 163% to 24% for peak compressional pressure (p+), from 113% to 15% for peak rarefactional pressure (p-), and from 126% to 29% for pulse intensity integral (PII). Complex deconvolution reduced mean coefficient of variation (COV) (for 6 fiber optic hydrophones) from 18% to 11% (p+), 53% to 11% (p-), and 20% to 16% (PII). Deconvolution based on sensitivity magnitude or the minimum phase model also resulted in significant reductions in mean bias and COV of acoustic output parameters but was less effective than direct complex deconvolution for p+ and p-. Therefore, deconvolution with appropriate filtering facilitates reliable nonlinear acoustic output measurements using hydrophones with frequency-dependent sensitivity.

Year:  2015        PMID: 25585399      PMCID: PMC6936620          DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2014.006578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  15 in total

1.  Frequency response of fiber-optic multilayer hydrophones: experimental investigation and finite element simulation.

Authors:  Wieland Weise; Volker Wilken; Christian Koch
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Amplitude and phase calibration of hydrophones by heterodyne and time-gated time-delay spectrometry.

Authors:  Christian Koch
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  A comparative evaluation of three hydrophones and a numerical model in high intensity focused ultrasound fields.

Authors:  Julian Haller; Klaus-Vitold Jenderka; Gianni Durando; Adam Shaw
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 4.  Progress in medical ultrasound exposimetry.

Authors:  Gerald R Harris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  A model of the effects of hydrophone and amplifier frequency response on ultrasound exposure measurements.

Authors:  G R Harris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  A Fabry-Perot fiber-optic ultrasonic hydrophone for the simultaneous measurement of temperature and acoustic pressure.

Authors:  Paul Morris; Andrew Hurrell; Adam Shaw; Edward Zhang; Paul Beard
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Are current hydrophone low frequency response standards acceptable for measuring mechanical/cavitation indices?

Authors:  G R Harris
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 2.890

8.  Shock-wave measurement using a calibrated interferometric fiber-tip sensor.

Authors:  C Koch; W Molkenstruck; R Reibold
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.998

9.  Time-delay spectrometry measurement of magnitude and phase of hydrophone response.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Paul M Gammell; Subha Maruvada; Yunbo Liu; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Acoustic characterization of high intensity focused ultrasound fields: a combined measurement and modeling approach.

Authors:  Michael S Canney; Michael R Bailey; Lawrence A Crum; Vera A Khokhlova; Oleg A Sapozhnikov
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.482

View more
  16 in total

1.  Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part I: Spatiotemporal Transfer Function and Graphical Guide.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Considerations for Choosing Sensitive Element Size for Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones-Part II: Experimental Validation of Spatial Averaging Model.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Yunbo Liu
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 2.725

3.  Variation of High-Intensity Therapeutic Ultrasound (HITU) Pressure Field Characterization: Effects of Hydrophone Choice, Nonlinearity, Spatial Averaging and Complex Deconvolution.

Authors:  Yunbo Liu; Keith A Wear; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of Membrane Hydrophones: Theory Versus Experiment.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Christian Baker; Piero Miloro
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.725

5.  Correction for Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Artifacts for Circular Sources.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.725

6.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part II: Validation for ARFI and Pulsed Doppler Waveforms.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Anant Shah; Aoife M Ivory; Christian Baker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Hydrophone Spatial Averaging Correction for Acoustic Exposure Measurements From Arrays-Part I: Theory and Impact on Diagnostic Safety Indexes.

Authors:  Keith A Wear
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.725

8.  Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of a Reflectance-Based Fiber-Optic Hydrophone: Predictions From Theoretical Models Compared With Measurements.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Samuel M Howard
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 2.725

9.  Pressure Pulse Distortion by Needle and Fiber-Optic Hydrophones due to Nonuniform Sensitivity.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Yunbo Liu; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.725

10.  Directivity and Frequency-Dependent Effective Sensitive Element Size of Needle Hydrophones: Predictions From Four Theoretical Forms Compared With Measurements.

Authors:  Keith A Wear; Christian Baker; Piero Miloro
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.