Literature DB >> 29616345

Accuracy and trending ability of the fourth-generation FloTrac/Vigileo System™ in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

Takuma Maeda1,2, Kohshi Hattori3, Miho Sumiyoshi4, Hiroko Kanazawa4, Yoshihiko Ohnishi4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The fourth-generation FloTrac/Vigileo™ improved its algorithm to follow changes in systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI). This revision may improve the accuracy and trending ability of CI even in patients who undergo abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery which cause drastic change of SVRI by aortic clamping. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the accuracy and trending ability of the fourth-generation FloTrac/Vigileo™ in patients with AAA surgery by comparing the FloTrac/Vigileo™-derived CI (CIFT) with that measured by three-dimensional echocardiography (CI3D).
METHODS: Twenty-six patients undergoing elective AAA surgery were included in this study. CIFT and CI3D were determined simultaneously in eight points including before and after aortic clamp. We used CI3D as the reference method.
RESULTS: In the Bland-Altman analysis, CIFT had a wide limit of agreement with CI3D showing a percentage error of 46.7%. Subgroup analysis showed that the percentage error between CO3D and COFT was 56.3% in patients with cardiac index < 2.5 L/min/m2 and 28.4% in patients with cardiac index ≥ 2.5 L/min/m2. SVRI was significantly higher in patients with cardiac index < 2.5 L/min/m2 (1703 ± 330 vs. 2757 ± 798; p < 0.001). The tracking ability of fourth generation of FloTrac/Vigileo™ after aortic clamp was not clinically acceptable (26.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: The degree of accuracy of the fourth-generation FloTrac/Vigileo™ in patients with AAA surgery was not acceptable. The tracking ability of the fourth-generation FloTrac/Vigileo™ after aortic clamp was below the acceptable limit.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Blood pressure monitors; Cardiac output; Echocardiography; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29616345     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-018-2491-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  22 in total

Review 1.  A critical review of the ability of continuous cardiac output monitors to measure trends in cardiac output.

Authors:  Lester A Critchley; Anna Lee; Anthony M-H Ho
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular volumes: multicenter study for validation with magnetic resonance imaging and investigation of sources of error.

Authors:  Victor Mor-Avi; Carly Jenkins; Harald P Kühl; Hans-Joachim Nesser; Thomas Marwick; Andreas Franke; Christian Ebner; Benjamin H Freed; Regina Steringer-Mascherbauer; Heidi Pollard; Lynn Weinert; Johannes Niel; Lissa Sugeng; Roberto M Lang
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-07

3.  Assessment of trending ability of cardiac output monitors by polar plot methodology.

Authors:  Lester A Critchley; Xiao X Yang; Anna Lee
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 4.  Real time three-dimensional echocardiography for quantification of ventricular volumes, mass, and function in children with congenital and acquired heart diseases.

Authors:  Rula Balluz; Liwen Liu; Xiaodong Zhou; Shuping Ge
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.724

5.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Clinical comparison of an echocardiograph-derived versus pulse counter-derived cardiac output measurement in abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

Authors:  Yusuke Kusaka; Kenji Yoshitani; Tomoya Irie; Yuzuru Inatomi; Masahide Shinzawa; Yoshihiko Ohnishi
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 2.628

7.  Comparison of left ventricular stroke volume assessment by two- and three-dimensional echocardiography in a swine model of acute myocardial infarction validated by thermodilution method.

Authors:  Yuichi J Shimada; Kiyotake Ishikawa; Yoshiaki Kawase; Dennis Ladage; Lisa Tilemann; Takahiro Shiota; Roger J Hajjar
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 1.724

8.  Reproducibility and accuracy of echocardiographic measurements of left ventricular parameters using real-time three-dimensional echocardiography.

Authors:  Carly Jenkins; Kristen Bricknell; Lizelle Hanekom; Thomas H Marwick
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2004-08-18       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Accuracy and Trending Ability of the Fourth-Generation FloTrac/Vigileo System in Patients With Low Cardiac Index.

Authors:  Kohshi Hattori; Takuma Maeda; Tetsuhito Masubuchi; Atsushi Yoshikawa; Keigo Ebuchi; Kuniko Morishima; Masataka Kamei; Kenji Yoshitani; Yoshihiko Ohnishi
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 2.628

10.  Understanding cardiac output.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Vincent
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 9.097

View more
  7 in total

1.  Accuracy and precision of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring by electrical cardiometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  M Sanders; S Servaas; C Slagt
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Accuracy of the ClearSight™ system in patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm surgery.

Authors:  Miho Sumiyoshi; Takuma Maeda; Erika Miyazaki; Naoshi Hotta; Hitoshi Sato; Eisuke Hamaguchi; Hiroko Kanazawa; Yoshihiko Ohnishi; Masataka Kamei
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  The accuracy and trending ability of cardiac index measured by the fourth-generation FloTrac/Vigileo system™ and the Fick method in cardiac surgery patients.

Authors:  Takuma Maeda; Eisuke Hamaguchi; Naoko Kubo; Akira Shimokawa; Hiroko Kanazawa; Yoshihiko Ohnishi
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Update on the assessment of fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  Koichi Suehiro
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 5.  Accuracy of non-invasive and minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring: where do we stand?

Authors:  Issa Pour-Ghaz; Theodore Manolukas; Nathalie Foray; Joel Raja; Aranyak Rawal; Uzoma N Ibebuogu; Rami N Khouzam
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-09

6.  Disagreement in cardiac output measurements between fourth-generation FloTrac and critical care ultrasonography in patients with circulatory shock: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Thomas Kaufmann; Ramon P Clement; Bart Hiemstra; Jaap Jan Vos; Thomas W L Scheeren; Frederik Keus; Iwan C C van der Horst
Journal:  J Intensive Care       Date:  2019-04-11

7.  The value of a superior vena cava collapsibility index measured with a miniaturized transoesophageal monoplane continuous echocardiography probe to predict fluid responsiveness compared to stroke volume variations in open major vascular surgery: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Şerban-Ion Bubenek-Turconi; Adham Hendy; Sorin Băilă; Anca Drăgan; Ovidiu Chioncel; Liana Văleanu; Bianca Moroșanu; Vlad-Anton Iliescu
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-07-05       Impact factor: 2.502

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.